Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"02.13 Wissenschaftspraxis"
  1. Kling, R.; Rosenbaum, H.; Sawyer, S.: Understanding and communicating social informatics : a framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies (2005) 0.03
    0.025185222 = product of:
      0.050370444 = sum of:
        0.0101292925 = weight(_text_:science in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0101292925 = score(doc=3312,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.08231623 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
        0.040241152 = sum of:
          0.022339288 = weight(_text_:history in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022339288 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0467152 = queryNorm
              0.10279526 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
          0.017901864 = weight(_text_:22 in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017901864 = score(doc=3312,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0467152 = queryNorm
              0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Classification
    303.48/33 22
    DDC
    303.48/33 22
    Footnote
    The opening chapter provides a 10-page introduction to social informatics and identifies three high-level subdomains of the field: the normative, analytical, and critical orientations. Chapter 2 then narrows the focus to the social, technical, and institutional nature and consequences of ICTs, and provides a well-chosen review and analysis of social informatics research, mostly case studies of system implementations gone wrong. The recurring finding in these cases is that the social and institutional context of the system implementation was not sufficiently accounted for. In light of these concrete examples, the value and applicability of a social informatics perspective becomes clear. The chapters are organized exceptionally well, with bullet points and tables summarizing core ideas. One particularly good example of the organization of ideas is a table comparing designer-centric and social design views on the task of designing ICTs for workplaces (p. 42). Included are the different views of work, intended goals, design assumptions, and technological choices inherent in each design philosophy. Readers can immediately grasp how a social informatics perspective, as opposed to the more traditional designer-centric perspective, would result in significant differences in the design of workplace ICTs. The chapter titled, "Social Informatics for Designers, Developers, and Implementers of ICT Based Systems," provides an extremely focused introduction to the importance of social informatics for system builders, with more examples of large-scale system breakdowns resulting from failure to account for context, such as the 1988 destruction of a civilian passenger jet in the Persian Gulf by the USS Vincennes. However, many of the chapter subheadings have promising titles such as "ICTs Rarely Cause Social Transformations" (p. 28), and though the findings of several studies that reach this conclusion are reviewed, this section is but a page in length and no dissenting findings are mentioned; this seems insufficient support for such a substantial claim. Throughout the book, conclusions from different studies are effectively juxtaposed and summarized to create a sense of a cohesive body of social informatics research findings, which are expressed in a very accessible manner. At the same time, the findings are discussed in relation to their applicability to diverse audiences outside the social informatics field: system designers and developers, ICT policy analysts, teachers of technical curricula, and ICT professionals. Anticipating and addressing the concerns of such a diverse group of audiences outside the field of social informatics is an admirable but overly ambitious goal to achieve in a 153-page book (not counting the excellent glossary, references, and appendices). For example, the chapter on social informatics for ICT policy analysts includes approximately twenty pages of ICT policy history in the U.S. and Europe, which seems a luxury in such a small volume. Though it is unquestionably relevant material, it does not fit well with the rest of the book and might be more effective as a stand-alone chapter for an information policy course, perhaps used in tandem with the introduction.
    In the authors' view, the primary means to more widespread acceptance of social informatics is to integrate it with the more traditionally technical curricula of ICT oriented students in computer science and related fields, and this is the focus of Chapter 5. Here the book delivers on its promise of providing a clear framework for both understanding and teaching social informatics. The goal is not simply to learn how to build systems, but to learn how to build systems that account for the context in which they are used. The authors prescribe field experience problem-driven learning techniques embedded in the needs of particular organizations, and a critical, reflexive orientation toward ICT design and construction. In a chapter endnote, the authors mention that a socia informatics perspective would also be useful to students in other fields such as communication and education, but that space limitations required a focus on computer science. Though an understandable choice, if the goal is to convince those outside the field of the value of a social informatics perspective, it would seem natural to include management or economics curricula as fertile ground to analyze some of the tangible effects of a failure to account for the social context of system implementations. Chapter 6 is something of an outreach manifesto, a treatise on communicating social informatics research to professional and research communities, and an explicit call for social informatics researchers "to shoulder the responsibility for communicating the core of social informatics . . . to ICT professionals and other research communities" (pp. 106-107). The authors are not shy about framing social informatics less as a research field and more as an up-and-coming competitor in the marketplace of ICT-oriented ideas; achieving more widespread acceptance of social informatics is presented almost as a sales and marketing challenge, the goal being "getting to yes" in the minds of ICT professionals. It is an effective presentation strategy, but one that comes with a cost.
  2. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.02
    0.022345083 = product of:
      0.044690166 = sum of:
        0.032031637 = weight(_text_:science in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032031637 = score(doc=3769,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.26030678 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
        0.01265853 = product of:
          0.02531706 = sum of:
            0.02531706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02531706 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The debate about access to scientific research raises questions about the current effectiveness of scholarly communication processes. This book explores, from an independent point of view, the current state of the STM publishing market, new publishing technologies and business models as well as the information habit of researchers, the politics of research funders, and the demand for scientific research as a public good. The book also investigates the democratisation of science including how the information needs of knowledge workers outside academia can be embraced in future.
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
    LCSH
    Communication in science
    Science publishing
    Subject
    Communication in science
    Science publishing
  3. Zedelmaier, H.: Bibliotheca universalis und bibliotheca selecta : das Problem der Ordnung des gelehrten Wissens in der frühen Neuzeit (1992) 0.01
    0.011169644 = product of:
      0.044678576 = sum of:
        0.044678576 = product of:
          0.08935715 = sum of:
            0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08935715 = score(doc=3932,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Libraries / History / 1400 / 1600
    Classification / Books / History
    Subject
    Libraries / History / 1400 / 1600
    Classification / Books / History
  4. Representation in scientific practice revisited (2014) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=3543,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Representation in Scientific Practice, published by the MIT Press in 1990, helped coalesce a long-standing interest in scientific visualization among historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science and remains a touchstone for current investigations in science and technology studies. This volume revisits the topic, taking into account both the changing conceptual landscape of STS and the emergence of new imaging technologies in scientific practice. It offers cutting-edge research on a broad array of fields that study information as well as short reflections on the evolution of the field by leading scholars, including some of the contributors to the 1990 volume. The essays consider the ways in which viewing experiences are crafted in the digital era; the embodied nature of work with digital technologies; the constitutive role of materials and technologies -- from chalkboards to brain scans -- in the production of new scientific knowledge; the metaphors and images mobilized by communities of practice; and the status and significance of scientific imagery in professional and popular culture. ContributorsMorana Alac, Michael Barany, Anne Beaulieu, Annamaria Carusi, Catelijne Coopmans, Lorraine Daston, Sarah de Rijcke, Joseph Dumit, Emma Frow, Yann Giraud, Aud Sissel Hoel, Martin Kemp, Bruno Latour, John Law, Michael Lynch, Donald MacKenzie, Cyrus Mody, Natasha Myers, Rachel Prentice, Arie Rip, Martin Ruivenkamp, Lucy Suchman, Janet Vertesi, Steve Woolgar
    LCSH
    Science / Methodology
    Subject
    Science / Methodology
  5. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01
    0.006329265 = product of:
      0.02531706 = sum of:
        0.02531706 = product of:
          0.05063412 = sum of:
            0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05063412 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  6. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.01
    0.0062029 = product of:
      0.0248116 = sum of:
        0.0248116 = weight(_text_:science in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0248116 = score(doc=2785,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20163277 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    "Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.
    RSWK
    Forschung / Datenverarbeitung / Informationssystem / Wissenschaft / E-Science
    Subject
    Forschung / Datenverarbeitung / Informationssystem / Wissenschaft / E-Science
  7. Beyond bibliometrics : harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly intent (2014) 0.01
    0.0062029 = product of:
      0.0248116 = sum of:
        0.0248116 = weight(_text_:science in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0248116 = score(doc=3026,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20163277 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Scholars and scripts, spoors and scores / Blaise CroninHistory and evolution of (biblio)metrics / Nicola De Bellis -- The citation : from culture to infrastructure / Paul Wouters -- The data it is me! / Ronald E. Day -- The ethics of evaluative bibliometrics / Jonathan Furner -- Criteria for evaluating indicators / Yves Gingras -- Obliteration by incorporation / Katherine W. McCain -- A network approach to scholarly evaluation / Jevin D. West and Daril A. Vilhena -- Science visualization and discursive knowledge / Loet Leydesdorff -- Measuring interdisciplinarity / Vincent Larivière and Yves Gingras -- Bibliometric standards for evaluating research institutes in the natural sciences / Lutz Bornmann, Benjamin E. Bowman, Jonathan Bauer, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier and Margit Palzenberger -- Identifying and quantifying research strengths using market segmentation / Kevin W. Boyack and Richard Klavans -- Finding and recommending scholarly articles / Michael J. Kurtz and Edwin A. Henneken -- Altmetrics / Jason Priem -- Web impact measures for research assessment / Kayvan Kousha and Mike Thelwall -- Bibliographic references in Web 2.0 / Judit Bar-Illan, Hadas Shema and Mike Thelwall -- Readership metrics / Stefanie Haustein -- Evaluating the work of judges / Peter Hook -- Academic genealogy / Cassidy R. Sugimoto -- A publishing perspective on bibliometrics / Judith Kamalski, Andrew Plume and Mayur Amin -- Science metrics and science policy / Julia Lane, Mark Largent and Rebecca Rosen.
  8. Andretta, S.: Information literacy : a practitioner's guide (2004) 0.00
    0.0031654038 = product of:
      0.012661615 = sum of:
        0.012661615 = weight(_text_:science in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012661615 = score(doc=589,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.10289528 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Information science / Examinations / Study guides
    Subject
    Information science / Examinations / Study guides

Languages

Types

Subjects