-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.03
0.034997817 = product of:
0.13999127 = sum of:
0.13999127 = sum of:
0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08935715 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.03
0.03062309 = product of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009)
0.03
0.03062309 = product of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:53
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.03
0.028198492 = product of:
0.056396984 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.031328265 = product of:
0.06265653 = sum of:
0.06265653 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06265653 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000)
0.02
0.024687836 = product of:
0.049375672 = sum of:
0.030387878 = weight(_text_:science in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030387878 = score(doc=1183,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The following discussion is in appreciation of the invaluable inspirations Pauline Cochrane, by her acumen and perspicacity, has implanted into my thinking regarding various applications of library and information science, especially those involving machine-readable records and subject categorization. It is indeed an honor for me at my age to be offered to contribute to Pauline's Festschrift when instead I should be concerned about my forthcoming obituary. In the following, I must give some Background to what formed my thinking before my involvement in the field and thus before I encountered Pauline.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994)
0.02
0.023610573 = product of:
0.047221147 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
-
Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004)
0.02
0.023610573 = product of:
0.047221147 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper will describe the way in which the USMARC cataloging schema is used at the Eisenhower National Clearing-house (ENC). Discussion will include how ENC MARC extensions were developed for cataloging mathematics and science curriculum resources, and how the ENC workflow is integrated into the cataloging interface. The discussion will conclude with a historical look at the in-house data transfer from ENC MARC to the current production of IEEE LOM XML encoding for record sharing and OAI compliance, required under the NSDL project guidelines.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.02
0.023610573 = product of:
0.047221147 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.02
0.02291517 = product of:
0.04583034 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.027924111 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055848222 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Weiss, P.J.: Everything you always wanted to know about format integration, but were afraid to ask (1994)
0.02
0.016754467 = product of:
0.06701787 = sum of:
0.06701787 = product of:
0.13403574 = sum of:
0.13403574 = weight(_text_:history in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13403574 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.6167716 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Examines the impetus, history, effects and implementation of format integration of the USMARC bibliographic formats
-
Duchemin, P.-Y.: BN OPALINE : the map database in the Department des Cartes et Plans de la Bibliothèque Nationale: history (1993)
0.02
0.015796263 = product of:
0.06318505 = sum of:
0.06318505 = product of:
0.1263701 = sum of:
0.1263701 = weight(_text_:history in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1263701 = score(doc=916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Provides a brief history of the Department des Cartes et Plans de la Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris before going on to discuss the computerization of its collections. Describes the computer format for cartographic documents which the Department has developed, INTERMARC(C), which is an extension of INTERMARC, the French version of MARC. Then discusses BN-OPALINE, the Department's computerized system for cartographic materials, and its functionality. Finally looks to the future and the Department's hope to create a national union catalogue of cartographic documents
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine-readable cataloging (MARC) (1988)
0.01
0.014324983 = product of:
0.05729993 = sum of:
0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05729993 = score(doc=1277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.43, [=Suppl.8]
-
Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.K.: Format integration and spatial data : a preliminary view (1993)
0.01
0.013962056 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = product of:
0.111696444 = sum of:
0.111696444 = weight(_text_:history in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111696444 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Provides a brief history and explains the principle of format integration. Gives 2 examples of monographic map records taken from the OCLC database. Explains significant or substantial differences between the present fixed fields and the projected fields for both these examples
-
Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or vivent les differences? (1996)
0.01
0.013962056 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = product of:
0.111696444 = sum of:
0.111696444 = weight(_text_:history in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111696444 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Investigates the history of the machine readable catalogue (MARC). Compares US and UK attitudes to MARC and raises the fact that US and UK standards are incompatible. Suggests that the 2 should be able to integrate and gives reasons for this
-
Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or 'vivent les differences'? (1996)
0.01
0.013962056 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = product of:
0.111696444 = sum of:
0.111696444 = weight(_text_:history in 6727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111696444 = score(doc=6727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 6727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6727)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Investigates the history of the machine readable catalogue and the role of the MARC format. Compares US and UK attitiudes to MARC and raises the issue of the incompatibility of the US and British standards. Suggests that they should be able to integrate, giving reasons for this
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.013426399 = product of:
0.053705595 = sum of:
0.053705595 = product of:
0.10741119 = sum of:
0.10741119 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10741119 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.01265853 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = product of:
0.10126824 = sum of:
0.10126824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10126824 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
