-
Maul, S.A.: Outstanding reference sources : the 1997 selection of recent titles (1997)
0.04
0.03666427 = product of:
0.07332854 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
0.044678576 = product of:
0.08935715 = sum of:
0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08935715 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents the 1997 annual recommendations of distinguished reference works selected by the ALA / Reference and User Services Association's Reference Source Committee. The 30 titles are presented and described under the following subject headings: the arts, law and order, science, the environment and health, culture and diversity, language and literature, and history
-
Lawrence, J.R.M.: Outstanding reference sources : the 1997 selection of new titles (1998)
0.04
0.03666427 = product of:
0.07332854 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
0.044678576 = product of:
0.08935715 = sum of:
0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08935715 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents an annotated guide to what are considered the most outstanding new reference works published in 1997. Titles are arranged by broad subject area, for example science and nature, religion, social issues, civilization and history. Also includes a discussion of the relative merits of print versus electronic resources
-
Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000)
0.03
0.034997817 = product of:
0.13999127 = sum of:
0.13999127 = sum of:
0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08935715 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Charts the history and development of the UK's Resource Discovery Network, which brings together under a common business, technical and service framework a range of subject gateways and other services for the academic and research community. Considers its future relationship to other services, and position within the information ecology
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:36:13
-
Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Intellectual structure of information science 2011-2020 : an author co-citation analysis (2022)
0.03
0.034746435 = product of:
0.06949287 = sum of:
0.037900344 = weight(_text_:science in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037900344 = score(doc=610,freq=14.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30799913 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
0.031592526 = product of:
0.06318505 = sum of:
0.06318505 = weight(_text_:history in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06318505 = score(doc=610,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2907489 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose This study continues a long history of author co-citation analysis of the intellectual structure of information science into the time period of 2011-2020. It also examines changes in this structure from 2006-2010 through 2011-2015 to 2016-2020. Results will contribute to a better understanding of the information science research field. Design/methodology/approach The well-established procedures and techniques for author co-citation analysis were followed. Full records of research articles in core information science journals published during 2011-2020 were retrieved and downloaded from the Web of Science database. About 150 most highly cited authors in each of the two five-year time periods were selected from this dataset to represent this field, and their co-citation counts were calculated. Each co-citation matrix was input into SPSS for factor analysis, and results were visualized in Pajek. Factors were interpreted as specialties and labeled upon an examination of articles written by authors who load primarily on each factor. Findings The two-camp structure of information science continued to be present clearly. Bibliometric indicators for research evaluation dominated the Knowledge Domain Analysis camp during both fivr-year time periods, whereas interactive information retrieval (IR) dominated the IR camp during 2011-2015 but shared dominance with information behavior during 2016-2020. Bridging between the two camps became increasingly weaker and was only provided by the scholarly communication specialty during 2016-2020. The IR systems specialty drifted further away from the IR camp. The information behavior specialty experienced a deep slump during 2011-2020 in its evolution process. Altmetrics grew to dominate the Webometrics specialty and brought it to a sharp increase during 2016-2020. Originality/value Author co-citation analysis (ACA) is effective in revealing intellectual structures of research fields. Most related studies used term-based methods to identify individual research topics but did not examine the interrelationships between these topics or the overall structure of the field. The few studies that did discuss the overall structure paid little attention to the effect of changes to the source journals on the results. The present study does not have these problems and continues the long history of benchmark contributions to a better understanding of the information science field using ACA.
-
Williams, M.E.; Burgard, D.E.: New database products : social science, humanities, news and general (issue 11) (1998)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.169-190
-
Williams, M.E.; Novotny, E.: New database products : social science, humanities, news and general (issue 1) (1993)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 17. 1.1999 10:44:22
-
Williams, M.E.; Burgard, D.E.: New database products : social science, humanities, news and general (issue 12) (1998)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.5, S.323-336
-
Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Subject gateways zu den Bereichen: Business economics - The virtual music library - clinical information - food science and food technology - energy technology
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:31
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.03
0.033234812 = product of:
0.066469625 = sum of:
0.05064646 = weight(_text_:science in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05064646 = score(doc=2352,freq=16.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
- Object
- Web of Science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
-
Williams, M.E.; Smith, L.C.: New database products : science, technology and medicine (issue 12) (1998)
0.03
0.032917116 = product of:
0.06583423 = sum of:
0.04051717 = weight(_text_:science in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04051717 = score(doc=3283,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Part 12 of a continuing series of articles reporting new online, CD-ROM and other electronic databases in the fields of science, technology and medicine; summarizing and commenting on the new databases. The databases are taken from newly announced databases in the Gale Directory of Databases
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.263-274
-
Fecko, M.B.: Electronic resources : access and issues (1997)
0.03
0.03208124 = product of:
0.06416248 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
0.039093755 = product of:
0.07818751 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a general introduction to how libraries use electronic resources, ranging from document delivery services and electronic mail to the Internet and WWW. Explores the available resources and examines their impact on libraries, library provision of information and the way that library and information professionals and users respond to them. Specific sections consist of: history and evolution of electronic resources; the Internet and its applications; electronic publishing and document delivery services; interactive multimedia; virtual libraries and digital libraries; bibliography and references
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Managing information 5(1998) no.4, S.42-43 (J.Gilbey); Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.2, S.150-151 (R. Yeates)
-
"Zeitgeschichte-online" - das Fachportal für die zeithistorische Forschung gestartet (2004)
0.03
0.03062309 = product of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 2160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=2160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2160)
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=2160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2160)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Am 26. Januar startet "Zeitgeschichte-online" - ein neues Internetportal mit einem umfangreichen Informationsangebot für die zeithistorische Forschung. Das Portal erschließt zeithistorische Internet-Ressourcen, enthält Tagungsberichte, Rezensionen sowie redaktionell betreute Themenangebote und ermöglicht eine komfortable Katalog- und Datenbanksuche. Teil des Portals ist außerdem die neue Fachzeitschrift "Zeithistorische Forschungen/Studies in Contemporary History". Sie erscheint in zwei Ausgaben: einer Online-Version und einer parallelen Druckausgabe (beim Verlag Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, http://www.v-r.de). Das Fachportal "Zeitgeschichte-online" ist ein gemeinsames Projekt des Zentrums für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam und der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Es ist zugleich als ein Modul des geschichtswissenschaftlichen Portals "Clio-online" konzipiert (http://www.clioonline.de) und kooperiert eng mit dem Informationsdienst "H-Soz-u-Kult" (http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de). Das Projekt wird von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft gefördert. Ausführlichere Projektinformationen gibt es unter http://www.zeitgeschichte-online.de.
- Date
- 22. 3.2004 12:17:05
-
Luyt, B.; Tan, D.: Improving Wikipedia's credibility : references and citations in a sample of history articles (2010)
0.03
0.02869844 = product of:
0.05739688 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.039490655 = product of:
0.07898131 = sum of:
0.07898131 = weight(_text_:history in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07898131 = score(doc=3437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3634361 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study evaluates how well the authors of Wikipedia history articles adhere to the site's policy of assuring verifiability through citations. It does so by examining the references and citations of a subset of country histories. The findings paint a dismal picture. Not only are many claims not verified through citations, those that are suffer from the choice of references used. Many of these are from only a few US government Websites or news media and few are to academic journal material. Given these results, one response would be to declare Wikipedia unsuitable for serious reference work. But another option emerges when we jettison technological determinism and look at Wikipedia as a product of a wider social context. Key to this context is a world in which information is bottled up as commodities requiring payment for access. Equally important is the problematic assumption that texts are undifferentiated bearers of knowledge. Those involved in instructional programs can draw attention to the social nature of texts to counter these assumptions and by so doing create an awareness for a new generation of Wikipedians and Wikipedia users of the need to evaluate texts (and hence citations) in light of the social context of their production and use.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.715-722
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015)
0.03
0.028102597 = product of:
0.056205194 = sum of:
0.0372174 = weight(_text_:science in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372174 = score(doc=2358,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 16:50:22
- Object
- World of Science
-
Luyt, B.: ¬The inclusivity of Wikipedia and the drawing of expert boundaries : an examination of talk pages and reference lists (2012)
0.03
0.027498204 = product of:
0.05499641 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
0.033508934 = product of:
0.06701787 = sum of:
0.06701787 = weight(_text_:history in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06701787 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Wikipedia is frequently viewed as an inclusive medium. But inclusivity within this online encyclopedia is not a simple matter of just allowing anyone to contribute. In its quest for legitimacy as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia relies on outsiders to judge claims championed by rival editors. In choosing these experts, Wikipedians define the boundaries of acceptable comment on any given subject. Inclusivity then becomes a matter of how the boundaries of expertise are drawn. In this article I examine the nature of these boundaries and the implications they have for inclusivity and credibility as revealed through the talk pages produced and sources used by a particular subset of Wikipedia's creators-those involved in writing articles on the topic of Philippine history.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1868-1878
-
Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:07:29
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.419-429
-
Boettcher, J.; Kingma, B.R.: Telephone directories : alternatives to print (1994)
0.03
0.026248364 = product of:
0.104993455 = sum of:
0.104993455 = sum of:
0.06701787 = weight(_text_:history in 1712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06701787 = score(doc=1712,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 1712, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1712)
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=1712,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1712, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1712)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Telephone directories are one of the most used sources of information in a reference collection. As the library literature indicates, they are a stable reference tool with a strong history of use. Further, it has been observed that telephone directories are familiar to most users, and resources such as the community pages and yellow pages are used extensively. However, the emergence of CD-ROM technology and libraries being charged for printed directories has raised questions concerning the future of an all-print telephone directory collection in libraries. Yet, evaluation of acquisitions alternatives for these resources is largely missing in the library literature. In this article, Boettcher and Kingma review the literature regarding the use of telephone directories in academic and public libraries and provide a cost analysis of the four purchasing options regarding telephone directories: printed directories, directory assistance, Phonefiche, and CD-ROMs
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.53-61
-
Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997)
0.03
0.02581781 = product of:
0.05163562 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=228,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.3, A.161-162
-
Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014)
0.02
0.024687836 = product of:
0.049375672 = sum of:
0.030387878 = weight(_text_:science in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030387878 = score(doc=1540,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 18.11.2014 13:22:03
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2381-2403
-
Wang, P.; Li, X.: Assessing the quality of information on Wikipedia : a deep-learning approach (2020)
0.02
0.02291517 = product of:
0.04583034 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=5505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
0.027924111 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055848222 = score(doc=5505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Currently, web document repositories have been collaboratively created and edited. One of these repositories, Wikipedia, is facing an important problem: assessing the quality of Wikipedia. Existing approaches exploit techniques such as statistical models or machine leaning algorithms to assess Wikipedia article quality. However, existing models do not provide satisfactory results. Furthermore, these models fail to adopt a comprehensive feature framework. In this article, we conduct an extensive survey of previous studies and summarize a comprehensive feature framework, including text statistics, writing style, readability, article structure, network, and editing history. Selected state-of-the-art deep-learning models, including the convolutional neural network (CNN), deep neural network (DNN), long short-term memory (LSTMs) network, CNN-LSTMs, bidirectional LSTMs, and stacked LSTMs, are applied to assess the quality of Wikipedia. A detailed comparison of deep-learning models is conducted with regard to different aspects: classification performance and training performance. We include an importance analysis of different features and feature sets to determine which features or feature sets are most effective in distinguishing Wikipedia article quality. This extensive experiment validates the effectiveness of the proposed model.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.16-28
