Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.03
    0.028802473 = product of:
      0.057604946 = sum of:
        0.035452522 = weight(_text_:science in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035452522 = score(doc=2342,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
        0.022152426 = product of:
          0.04430485 = sum of:
            0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04430485 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  2. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.03
    0.027190173 = product of:
      0.054380346 = sum of:
        0.0101292925 = weight(_text_:science in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0101292925 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.08231623 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.044251055 = sum of:
          0.031592526 = weight(_text_:history in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031592526 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0467152 = queryNorm
              0.14537445 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.01265853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01265853 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0467152 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library science
  3. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.02
    0.023610573 = product of:
      0.047221147 = sum of:
        0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068719 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.022152426 = product of:
          0.04430485 = sum of:
            0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04430485 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  4. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003) 0.02
    0.02291517 = product of:
      0.04583034 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
        0.027924111 = product of:
          0.055848222 = sum of:
            0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055848222 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
  5. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.02
    0.020237632 = product of:
      0.040475264 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.018987793 = product of:
          0.037975587 = sum of:
            0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037975587 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  6. Tunkelang, D.: Faceted search (2009) 0.02
    0.018332135 = product of:
      0.03666427 = sum of:
        0.014324983 = weight(_text_:science in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014324983 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
        0.022339288 = product of:
          0.044678576 = sum of:
            0.044678576 = weight(_text_:history in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044678576 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.20559052 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We live in an information age that requires us, more than ever, to represent, access, and use information. Over the last several decades, we have developed a modern science and technology for information retrieval, relentlessly pursuing the vision of a "memex" that Vannevar Bush proposed in his seminal article, "As We May Think." Faceted search plays a key role in this program. Faceted search addresses weaknesses of conventional search approaches and has emerged as a foundation for interactive information retrieval. User studies demonstrate that faceted search provides more effective information-seeking support to users than best-first search. Indeed, faceted search has become increasingly prevalent in online information access systems, particularly for e-commerce and site search. In this lecture, we explore the history, theory, and practice of faceted search. Although we cannot hope to be exhaustive, our aim is to provide sufficient depth and breadth to offer a useful resource to both researchers and practitioners. Because faceted search is an area of interest to computer scientists, information scientists, interface designers, and usability researchers, we do not assume that the reader is a specialist in any of these fields. Rather, we offer a self-contained treatment of the topic, with an extensive bibliography for those who would like to pursue particular aspects in more depth.
  7. Place, E.: International collaboration on Internet subject gateways (2000) 0.02
    0.016864695 = product of:
      0.03372939 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
        0.015823163 = product of:
          0.031646326 = sum of:
            0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031646326 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:35
  8. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.01
    0.01265853 = product of:
      0.05063412 = sum of:
        0.05063412 = product of:
          0.10126824 = sum of:
            0.10126824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10126824 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  9. Buxton, A.: Computer searching of UDC numbers (1993) 0.01
    0.0125343595 = product of:
      0.050137438 = sum of:
        0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050137438 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.51, [=Suppl.14]
  10. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.0125343595 = product of:
      0.050137438 = sum of:
        0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050137438 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
  11. Welty, C.A.; Jenkins, J.: Formal ontology for subject (1999) 0.01
    0.011169644 = product of:
      0.044678576 = sum of:
        0.044678576 = product of:
          0.08935715 = sum of:
            0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08935715 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject based classification is an important part of information retrieval, and has a long history in libraries, where a subject taxonomy was used to determine the location of books on the shelves. We have been studying the notion of subject itself, in order to determine a formal ontology of subject for a large scale digital library card catalog system. Deep analysis reveals a lot of ambiguity regarding the usage of subjects in existing systems and terminology, and we attempt to formalize these notions into a single framework for representing it.
  12. Zaytseva, E.: Classification tools for librarians and users : the Russian experience (2008) 0.01
    0.011169644 = product of:
      0.044678576 = sum of:
        0.044678576 = product of:
          0.08935715 = sum of:
            0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08935715 = score(doc=2179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper considers the history of the development of electronic versions of library classifications in Russia. It describes classification tools specially designed for OPAC users and librarians - classifiers and classification editors.
  13. Rolland-Thomas, P.: ¬The role of classification in subject retrieval in the future (1976) 0.01
    0.010743736 = product of:
      0.042974945 = sum of:
        0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 1845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042974945 = score(doc=1845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 1845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1845)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library Science
  14. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01
    0.009493897 = product of:
      0.037975587 = sum of:
        0.037975587 = product of:
          0.075951174 = sum of:
            0.075951174 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075951174 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  15. Frost, C.O.: ¬The University of Michigan School of Information Art Image Browser : designing and testing a model for image retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.0083772335 = product of:
      0.033508934 = sum of:
        0.033508934 = product of:
          0.06701787 = sum of:
            0.06701787 = weight(_text_:history in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06701787 = score(doc=5174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A team at the University of Michigan School of Information designed, implemented and is evaluating a WWW-based experimental system which uses classification to facilitate browsing of art images. The research team built a database of approximately 3.000 digitized images from Art History to determine if classification can be used for retrieving images from a digital database in a networked environment. A key premise in this research is that browsing can serve an important role in retrieving image information. The system was evaluated in controlled tests and through a questionnaire available to WWW users
  16. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.01
    0.007911582 = product of:
      0.031646326 = sum of:
        0.031646326 = product of:
          0.06329265 = sum of:
            0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06329265 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  17. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.01
    0.007911582 = product of:
      0.031646326 = sum of:
        0.031646326 = product of:
          0.06329265 = sum of:
            0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06329265 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  18. Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014) 0.01
    0.0075969696 = product of:
      0.030387878 = sum of:
        0.030387878 = weight(_text_:science in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030387878 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.948-963
  19. Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989) 0.01
    0.0075969696 = product of:
      0.030387878 = sum of:
        0.030387878 = weight(_text_:science in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030387878 = score(doc=2071,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
    Editor
    School of Information Science and Policy
  20. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 7

Types

  • a 53
  • el 5
  • m 4
  • s 4
  • More… Less…