-
Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998)
0.08
0.078972444 = product of:
0.15794489 = sum of:
0.035452522 = weight(_text_:science in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035452522 = score(doc=2346,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Getty has a lenghty history in the research and development of thesauri and other structured vocabulary tools to make the use and exchange of electronic information easier
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.04
0.040475264 = product of:
0.08095053 = sum of:
0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042974945 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.037975587 = product of:
0.075951174 = sum of:
0.075951174 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075951174 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
- Source
- Journal of information science. 25(1999) no.2, S.113-131
-
Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006)
0.03
0.026248364 = product of:
0.104993455 = sum of:
0.104993455 = sum of:
0.06701787 = weight(_text_:history in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06701787 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The need for Persian thesauri became apparent during the late 1960s with the advent of documentation centres in Iran. The first Persian controlled vocabulary was published by IRANDOC in 1977. Other centres worked on translations of existing thesauri, but it was soon realised that these efforts did not meet the needs of the centres. After the Islamic revolution in 1979, the foundation of new centres intensified the need for Persian thesauri, especially in the fields of history and government documents. Also, during the Iran-Iraq war, Iranian research centres produced reports in scientific and technical fields, both to support military requirements and to meet society's needs. In order to provide a comprehensive thesaurus, the Council of Scientific Research of Iran approved a project for the compilation of such a work. Nowadays, 12 Persian thesauri are available and others are being prepared, based on the literary corpus and conformity with characteristics of Iranian culture.
- Source
- Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
-
Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988)
0.02
0.023610573 = product of:
0.047221147 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:52:34
- Source
- ASIS'88. Information technology: planning for the next fifty years. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Americal Society for Information Science, Atlanta, Georgia, 23.-27.10.1988. Vol.25. Ed. by C.L. Borgman and E.Y.H. Pai
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.02
0.023610573 = product of:
0.047221147 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
-
Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998)
0.02
0.020573197 = product of:
0.041146394 = sum of:
0.02532323 = weight(_text_:science in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02532323 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Foskett, D.J.: Thesaurus (1980)
0.01
0.014324983 = product of:
0.05729993 = sum of:
0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05729993 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.30
-
¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004)
0.01
0.013749102 = product of:
0.027498204 = sum of:
0.010743736 = weight(_text_:science in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010743736 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.08730954 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.016754467 = product of:
0.033508934 = sum of:
0.033508934 = weight(_text_:history in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033508934 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1541929 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.95-97 (A. Gilchrist):"It might be thought unfortunate that the word thesaurus is assonant with prehistoric beasts but as this book clearly demonstrates, the thesaurus is undergoing a notable revival, and we can remind ourselves that the word comes from the Greek thesaurus, meaning a treasury. This is a useful and timely source book, bringing together ten chapters, following an Editorial introduction and culminating in an interview with a member of the team responsible for revising the NISO Standard Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual thesauri; formal proof of the thesaural renaissance. Though predominantly an American publication, it is good to see four English authors as well as one from Canada and one from Denmark; and with a good balance of academics and practitioners. This has helped to widen the net in the citing of useful references. While the techniques of thesaurus construction are still basically sound, the Editors, in their introduction, point out that the thesaurus, in its sense of an information retrieval tool is almost exactly 50 years old, and that the information environment of today is radically different. They claim three purposes for the compilation: "to acquaint or remind the Library and Information Science community of the history of the development of the thesaurus and standards for thesaurus construction. to provide bibliographies and tutorials from which any reader can become more grounded in her or his understanding of thesaurus construction, use and evaluation. to address topics related to thesauri but that are unique to the current digital environment, or network of networks." This last purpose, understandably, tends to be the slightly more tentative part of the book, but as Rosenfeld and Morville said in their book Information architecture for the World Wide Web "thesauri [will] become a key tool for dealing with the growing size and importance of web sites and intranets". The evidence supporting their belief has been growing steadily in the seven years since the first edition was published.
-
Sager, J.C.: Terminological thesaurus : a more appropriate designation or a deprecated synonym? (1982)
0.01
0.0125343595 = product of:
0.050137438 = sum of:
0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 7538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050137438 = score(doc=7538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 7538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7538)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Social science information studies. 2(1982), S.211-214
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990)
0.01
0.0125343595 = product of:
0.050137438 = sum of:
0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050137438 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
-
Miller, U.: Thesaurus construction (2000)
0.01
0.0125343595 = product of:
0.050137438 = sum of:
0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050137438 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.68, [=Suppl.31]
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.01
0.011805287 = product of:
0.023610573 = sum of:
0.0125343595 = weight(_text_:science in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125343595 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.101861134 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.011076213 = product of:
0.022152426 = sum of:
0.022152426 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022152426 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989)
0.01
0.011076213 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = product of:
0.0886097 = sum of:
0.0886097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0886097 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
-
Mandersloot, W.G.B.: Thesaurus control : the selection grouping and cross-referencing of terms for inclusion in a coordinate index world list (1970)
0.01
0.010743736 = product of:
0.042974945 = sum of:
0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042974945 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 21(1970), S.49-57
-
Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, K.N.: Compatibility of the principles for design of thesaurus and classification scheme (1976)
0.01
0.010743736 = product of:
0.042974945 = sum of:
0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042974945 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation. 13(1976) no.2, S.56-66
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.01
0.010743736 = product of:
0.042974945 = sum of:
0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042974945 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.2, S.111-122
-
Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010)
0.01
0.010009887 = product of:
0.040039547 = sum of:
0.040039547 = weight(_text_:science in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040039547 = score(doc=3276,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.32538348 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The originality of this book, which deals with such a new subject matter, lies in the application of methods and concepts never used before - such as Ontologies and Taxonomies, as well as Thesauri - to the ordering of knowledge based on primary information. Chapters in the book also examine the study of Ontologies, Taxonomies and Thesauri from the perspective of Systematics and General Systems Theory. "Ontologies, Taxonomy and Thesauri in Information Organisation and Retrieval" will be extremely useful to those operating within the network of related fields, which includes Documentation and Information Science.
- Content
- Inhalt: 1. From classifications to ontologies Knowledge - A new concept of knowledge - Knowledge and information - Knowledge organisation - Knowledge organisation and representation - Cognitive sciences - Talent management - Learning systematisation - Historical evolution - From classification to knowledge organisation - Why ontologies exist - Ontologies - The structure of ontologies 2. Taxonomies and thesauri From ordering to taxonomy - The origins of taxonomy - Hierarchical and horizontal order - Correlation with classifications - Taxonomy in computer science - Computing taxonomy - Definitions - Virtual taxonomy, cybernetic taxonomy - Taxonomy in Information Science - Similarities between taxonomies and thesauri - ifferences between taxonomies and thesauri 3. Thesauri Terminology in classification systems - Terminological languages - Thesauri - Thesauri definitions - Conditions that a thesaurus must fulfil - Historical evolution - Classes of thesauri 4. Thesauri in (cladist) systematics Systematics - Systematics as a noun - Definitions and historic evolution over time - Differences between taxonomy and systematics - Systematics in thesaurus construction theory - Classic, numerical and cladist systematics - Classic systematics in information science - Numerical systematics in information science - Thesauri in cladist systematics - Systematics in information technology - Some examples 5. Thesauri in systems theory Historical evolution - Approach to systems - Systems theory applied to the construction of thesauri - Components - Classes of system - Peculiarities of these systems - Working methods - Systems theory applied to ontologies and taxonomies
-
Owens, L.A.; Cochrane, P.A.: Thesaurus evaluation (2004)
0.01
0.009773439 = product of:
0.039093755 = sum of:
0.039093755 = product of:
0.07818751 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=4856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The process of thesaurus evaluation can enhance the value of a thesaurus in terms of usability, scope, precision and recall. Structural, formative, observational and comparative evaluation techniques are explained along with specific examples of their use. These methods of evaluation can be applied in the assessment of an existing thesaurus or the construction of a new thesaurus. The history of thesauri since 1960, the development of national and international standards, and sources of evaluative literature are also discussed.
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.009493897 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = product of:
0.075951174 = sum of:
0.075951174 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075951174 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.009493897 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = product of:
0.075951174 = sum of:
0.075951174 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075951174 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
