-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.06
0.06324046 = product of:
0.12648092 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.104993455 = sum of:
0.06701787 = weight(_text_:history in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06701787 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.872-882
-
Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016)
0.04
0.03764977 = product of:
0.07529954 = sum of:
0.04737543 = weight(_text_:science in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04737543 = score(doc=731,freq=14.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38499892 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.027924111 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055848222 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book offers a comprehensive guide to the world of metadata, from its origins in the ancient cities of the Middle East, to the Semantic Web of today. The author takes us on a journey through the centuries-old history of metadata up to the modern world of crowdsourcing and Google, showing how metadata works and what it is made of. The author explores how it has been used ideologically and how it can never be objective. He argues how central it is to human cultures and the way they develop. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web is for all readers with an interest in how we humans organize our knowledge and why this is important. It is suitable for those new to the subject as well as those know its basics. It also makes an excellent introduction for students of information science and librarianship.
- LCSH
- Computer science
Library science
Popular computer science
- Subject
- Computer science
Library science
Popular computer science
-
Lazinger, S.S.: Digital preservation and metadata : history, theory, practice (2002)
0.04
0.03666427 = product of:
0.07332854 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 1262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=1262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1262)
0.044678576 = product of:
0.08935715 = sum of:
0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 1262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08935715 = score(doc=1262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 1262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Long-needed guide for anyone involved in the preservation of digital information and a "must for librarians, archiving professionals, faculty and students of library science, administrators and corporate leaders". Comprehensive literature review. The author has clearly been extremely thorough in tracking down an exhaustive record of the literature. This is then paraphrased and synthesized, but not critically
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.03
0.034997817 = product of:
0.13999127 = sum of:
0.13999127 = sum of:
0.08935715 = weight(_text_:history in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08935715 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.03
0.03372939 = product of:
0.06745878 = sum of:
0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035812456 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.031646326 = product of:
0.06329265 = sum of:
0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06329265 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019)
0.03
0.03318829 = product of:
0.13275316 = sum of:
0.13275316 = sum of:
0.09477758 = weight(_text_:history in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09477758 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.43612334 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article presents examples of metadata collaborations between the Swiss National Library (NL) and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography. The NL publishes the Bibliography on Swiss History (BSH). In order to meet the demands of its research community, the NL has improved the accessibility and interoperability of the BSH database. Moreover, the BSH takes part in metadata projects such as Metagrid, a web service linking different historical databases. Other metadata collaborations with partners in the historical field such as the Law Sources Foundation (LSF) will position the BSH as an indispensable literature hub for publications on Swiss history.
- Date
- 30. 5.2019 19:22:49
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.03
0.03062309 = product of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.12249236 = sum of:
0.07818751 = weight(_text_:history in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818751 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05)
0.03
0.028802473 = product of:
0.057604946 = sum of:
0.035452522 = weight(_text_:science in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035452522 = score(doc=637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:35:22
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
-
Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016)
0.02
0.023610573 = product of:
0.047221147 = sum of:
0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025068719 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.022152426 = product of:
0.04430485 = sum of:
0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430485 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
-
Koho, M.; Burrows, T.; Hyvönen, E.; Ikkala, E.; Page, K.; Ransom, L.; Tuominen, J.; Emery, D.; Fraas, M.; Heller, B.; Lewis, D.; Morrison, A.; Porte, G.; Thomson, E.; Velios, A.; Wijsman, H.: Harmonizing and publishing heterogeneous premodern manuscript metadata as Linked Open Data (2022)
0.02
0.02291517 = product of:
0.04583034 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
0.027924111 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055848222 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Manuscripts are a crucial form of evidence for research into all aspects of premodern European history and culture, and there are numerous databases devoted to describing them in detail. This descriptive information, however, is typically available only in separate data silos based on incompatible data models and user interfaces. As a result, it has been difficult to study manuscripts comprehensively across these various platforms. To address this challenge, a team of manuscript scholars and computer scientists worked to create "Mapping Manuscript Migrations" (MMM), a semantic portal, and a Linked Open Data service. MMM stands as a successful proof of concept for integrating distinct manuscript datasets into a shared platform for research and discovery with the potential for future expansion. This paper will discuss the major products of the MMM project: a unified data model, a repeatable data transformation pipeline, a Linked Open Data knowledge graph, and a Semantic Web portal. It will also examine the crucial importance of an iterative process of multidisciplinary collaboration embedded throughout the project, enabling humanities researchers to shape the development of a digital platform and tools, while also enabling the same researchers to ask more sophisticated and comprehensive research questions of the aggregated data.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.2, S.240-257
-
Heidorn, P.B.; Wei, Q.: Automatic metadata extraction from museum specimen labels (2008)
0.02
0.021873638 = product of:
0.08749455 = sum of:
0.08749455 = sum of:
0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055848222 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the information properties of museum specimen labels and machine learning tools to automatically extract Darwin Core (DwC) and other metadata from these labels processed through Optical Character Recognition (OCR). The DwC is a metadata profile describing the core set of access points for search and retrieval of natural history collections and observation databases. Using the HERBIS Learning System (HLS) we extract 74 independent elements from these labels. The automated text extraction tools are provided as a web service so that users can reference digital images of specimens and receive back an extended Darwin Core XML representation of the content of the label. This automated extraction task is made more difficult by the high variability of museum label formats, OCR errors and the open class nature of some elements. In this paper we introduce our overall system architecture, and variability robust solutions including, the application of Hidden Markov and Naïve Bayes machine learning models, data cleaning, use of field element identifiers, and specialist learning models. The techniques developed here could be adapted to any metadata extraction situation with noisy text and weakly ordered elements.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018)
0.02
0.020573197 = product of:
0.041146394 = sum of:
0.02532323 = weight(_text_:science in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02532323 = score(doc=4550,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In 2016, the University of Waterloo began offering a mediated copyright review and deposit service to support the growth of our institutional repository UWSpace. This resulted in the need to batch import large lists of published works into the institutional repository quickly and accurately. A range of methods have been proposed for harvesting publications metadata en masse, but many technological solutions can easily become detached from a workflow that is both reproducible for support staff and applicable to a range of situations. Many repositories offer the capacity for batch upload via CSV, so our method provides a template Python script that leverages the Habanero library for populating CSV files with existing metadata retrieved from the CrossRef API. In our case, we have combined this with useful metadata contained in a TSV file downloaded from Web of Science in order to enrich our metadata as well. The appeal of this 'low-maintenance' method is that it provides more robust options for gathering metadata semi-automatically, and only requires the user's ability to access Web of Science and the Python program, while still remaining flexible enough for local customizations.
- Date
- 10.11.2018 16:27:22
-
Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003)
0.02
0.020237632 = product of:
0.040475264 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
- Date
- 30.12.2008 18:22:46
-
Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008)
0.02
0.020237632 = product of:
0.040475264 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes metadata development of an application profile for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Achievement Standards Network (ASN) in the United States. The ASN is a national repository of machine-readable achievement standards modeled in RDF that shape teaching and learning in the various states. We describe the nature of the ASN metadata and the various uses to which that metadata is applied including the alignment of the standards of one state to those of another and the correlation of those standards to educational resources in support of resource discovery and retrieval.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.830-844
