-
Nunes, S.; Ribeiro, C.; David, G.: Term weighting based on document revision history (2011)
0.03
0.02869844 = product of:
0.05739688 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
0.039490655 = product of:
0.07898131 = sum of:
0.07898131 = weight(_text_:history in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07898131 = score(doc=4946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3634361 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In real-world information retrieval systems, the underlying document collection is rarely stable or definitive. This work is focused on the study of signals extracted from the content of documents at different points in time for the purpose of weighting individual terms in a document. The basic idea behind our proposals is that terms that have existed for a longer time in a document should have a greater weight. We propose 4 term weighting functions that use each document's history to estimate a current term score. To evaluate this thesis, we conduct 3 independent experiments using a collection of documents sampled from Wikipedia. In the first experiment, we use data from Wikipedia to judge each set of terms. In a second experiment, we use an external collection of tags from a popular social bookmarking service as a gold standard. In the third experiment, we crowdsource user judgments to collect feedback on term preference. Across all experiments results consistently support our thesis. We show that temporally aware measures, specifically the proposed revision term frequency and revision term frequency span, outperform a term-weighting measure based on raw term frequency alone.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2471-2478
-
Bodoff, D.; Wong, S.P.-S.: Documents and queries as random variables : history and implications (2006)
0.03
0.027498204 = product of:
0.05499641 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.033508934 = product of:
0.06701787 = sum of:
0.06701787 = weight(_text_:history in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06701787 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1138-1154
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.285-301
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.03
0.026983513 = product of:
0.053967025 = sum of:
0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028649965 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.02531706 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063412 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.02
0.02341883 = product of:
0.04683766 = sum of:
0.031014498 = weight(_text_:science in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031014498 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.948-966
-
Langville, A.N.; Meyer, C.D.: Google's PageRank and beyond : the science of search engine rankings (2006)
0.02
0.021151546 = product of:
0.042303093 = sum of:
0.0186087 = weight(_text_:science in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0186087 = score(doc=6,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.15122458 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.023694394 = product of:
0.04738879 = sum of:
0.04738879 = weight(_text_:history in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04738879 = score(doc=6,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.21806167 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Why doesn't your home page appear on the first page of search results, even when you query your own name? How do other Web pages always appear at the top? What creates these powerful rankings? And how? The first book ever about the science of Web page rankings, "Google's PageRank and Beyond" supplies the answers to these and other questions and more. The book serves two very different audiences: the curious science reader and the technical computational reader. The chapters build in mathematical sophistication, so that the first five are accessible to the general academic reader. While other chapters are much more mathematical in nature, each one contains something for both audiences. For example, the authors include entertaining asides such as how search engines make money and how the Great Firewall of China influences research. The book includes an extensive background chapter designed to help readers learn more about the mathematics of search engines, and it contains several MATLAB codes and links to sample Web data sets. The philosophy throughout is to encourage readers to experiment with the ideas and algorithms in the text. Any business seriously interested in improving its rankings in the major search engines can benefit from the clear examples, sample code, and list of resources provided. It includes: many illustrative examples and entertaining asides; MATLAB code; accessible and informal style; and complete and self-contained section for mathematics review.
- Content
- Inhalt: Chapter 1. Introduction to Web Search Engines: 1.1 A Short History of Information Retrieval - 1.2 An Overview of Traditional Information Retrieval - 1.3 Web Information Retrieval Chapter 2. Crawling, Indexing, and Query Processing: 2.1 Crawling - 2.2 The Content Index - 2.3 Query Processing Chapter 3. Ranking Webpages by Popularity: 3.1 The Scene in 1998 - 3.2 Two Theses - 3.3 Query-Independence Chapter 4. The Mathematics of Google's PageRank: 4.1 The Original Summation Formula for PageRank - 4.2 Matrix Representation of the Summation Equations - 4.3 Problems with the Iterative Process - 4.4 A Little Markov Chain Theory - 4.5 Early Adjustments to the Basic Model - 4.6 Computation of the PageRank Vector - 4.7 Theorem and Proof for Spectrum of the Google Matrix Chapter 5. Parameters in the PageRank Model: 5.1 The a Factor - 5.2 The Hyperlink Matrix H - 5.3 The Teleportation Matrix E Chapter 6. The Sensitivity of PageRank; 6.1 Sensitivity with respect to alpha - 6.2 Sensitivity with respect to H - 6.3 Sensitivity with respect to vT - 6.4 Other Analyses of Sensitivity - 6.5 Sensitivity Theorems and Proofs Chapter 7. The PageRank Problem as a Linear System: 7.1 Properties of (I - alphaS) - 7.2 Properties of (I - alphaH) - 7.3 Proof of the PageRank Sparse Linear System Chapter 8. Issues in Large-Scale Implementation of PageRank: 8.1 Storage Issues - 8.2 Convergence Criterion - 8.3 Accuracy - 8.4 Dangling Nodes - 8.5 Back Button Modeling
Chapter 9. Accelerating the Computation of PageRank: 9.1 An Adaptive Power Method - 9.2 Extrapolation - 9.3 Aggregation - 9.4 Other Numerical Methods Chapter 10. Updating the PageRank Vector: 10.1 The Two Updating Problems and their History - 10.2 Restarting the Power Method - 10.3 Approximate Updating Using Approximate Aggregation - 10.4 Exact Aggregation - 10.5 Exact vs. Approximate Aggregation - 10.6 Updating with Iterative Aggregation - 10.7 Determining the Partition - 10.8 Conclusions Chapter 11. The HITS Method for Ranking Webpages: 11.1 The HITS Algorithm - 11.2 HITS Implementation - 11.3 HITS Convergence - 11.4 HITS Example - 11.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of HITS - 11.6 HITS's Relationship to Bibliometrics - 11.7 Query-Independent HITS - 11.8 Accelerating HITS - 11.9 HITS Sensitivity Chapter 12. Other Link Methods for Ranking Webpages: 12.1 SALSA - 12.2 Hybrid Ranking Methods - 12.3 Rankings based on Traffic Flow Chapter 13. The Future of Web Information Retrieval: 13.1 Spam - 13.2 Personalization - 13.3 Clustering - 13.4 Intelligent Agents - 13.5 Trends and Time-Sensitive Search - 13.6 Privacy and Censorship - 13.7 Library Classification Schemes - 13.8 Data Fusion Chapter 14. Resources for Web Information Retrieval: 14.1 Resources for Getting Started - 14.2 Resources for Serious Study Chapter 15. The Mathematics Guide: 15.1 Linear Algebra - 15.2 Perron-Frobenius Theory - 15.3 Markov Chains - 15.4 Perron Complementation - 15.5 Stochastic Complementation - 15.6 Censoring - 15.7 Aggregation - 15.8 Disaggregation
-
Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001)
0.02
0.020573197 = product of:
0.041146394 = sum of:
0.02532323 = weight(_text_:science in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02532323 = score(doc=1753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:26:32
- LCSH
- Computer science / Mathematics
- Subject
- Computer science / Mathematics
-
Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003)
0.02
0.020237632 = product of:
0.040475264 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:36
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.281-284
-
Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004)
0.02
0.020237632 = product of:
0.040475264 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 31. 5.2004 19:22:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.7, S.628-636
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.02
0.020237632 = product of:
0.040475264 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.3232
-
Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003)
0.02
0.020237632 = product of:
0.040475264 = sum of:
0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021487473 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.018987793 = product of:
0.037975587 = sum of:
0.037975587 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037975587 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:30:19
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.302-313
-
Burgin, R.: ¬The retrieval effectiveness of 5 clustering algorithms as a function of indexing exhaustivity (1995)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 11:20:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.8, S.562-572
-
Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:35:46
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.321-334
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.462-478
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.02
0.016864695 = product of:
0.03372939 = sum of:
0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017906228 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.015823163 = product of:
0.031646326 = sum of:
0.031646326 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031646326 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.500-515
-
Rada, R.; Bicknell, E.: Ranking documents with a thesaurus (1989)
0.01
0.014324983 = product of:
0.05729993 = sum of:
0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 6908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05729993 = score(doc=6908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6908)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989) no.5, S.304-310
-
Davis, C.H.: Beyond Boole : the next logical step (1995)
0.01
0.014324983 = product of:
0.05729993 = sum of:
0.05729993 = weight(_text_:science in 3550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05729993 = score(doc=3550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3550)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 21(1995), S.17-20
-
Sparck Jones, K.: IDF term weighting and IR research lessons (2004)
0.01
0.013962056 = product of:
0.055848222 = sum of:
0.055848222 = product of:
0.111696444 = sum of:
0.111696444 = weight(_text_:history in 4422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111696444 = score(doc=4422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 4422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Robertson comments on the theoretical status of IDF term weighting. Its history illustrates how ideas develop in a specific research context, in theory/experiment interaction, and in operational practice.
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.01
0.01265853 = product of:
0.05063412 = sum of:
0.05063412 = product of:
0.10126824 = sum of:
0.10126824 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10126824 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Perry, R.; Willett, P.: ¬A revies of the use of inverted files for best match searching in information retrieval systems (1983)
0.01
0.0125343595 = product of:
0.050137438 = sum of:
0.050137438 = weight(_text_:science in 2701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050137438 = score(doc=2701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0467152 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 2701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2701)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 6(1983), S.59-66
