-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008)
0.04
0.0367373 = product of:
0.1102119 = sum of:
0.03365054 = weight(_text_:services in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03365054 = score(doc=2553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.07656136 = sum of:
0.033266082 = weight(_text_:resources in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033266082 = score(doc=2553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.04329528 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04329528 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:18
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.2, S.29-43
-
Holley, R.P.: Are technical services topics underrepresented in the contributed papers at the ACRL national conferences? (2007)
0.04
0.03522133 = product of:
0.10566399 = sum of:
0.08903095 = weight(_text_:services in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08903095 = score(doc=265,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.536602 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
0.016633041 = product of:
0.033266082 = sum of:
0.033266082 = weight(_text_:resources in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033266082 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This study tests the hypothesis that the contributed papers at the 12 ACRL national conferences do not cover topics of interest to technical services librarians in proportion to their membership in ACRL. The analysis showed that 14.66% of contributed papers dealt with subjects that were part of the charge of ALCTS, the technical services division in ALA, and its five sections. This percentage dropped to 7.52% with the removal of collection development papers that are also of high interest to many public services librarians. Current overlap statistics indicate that 18.83% of ACRL members also belong to ALCTS-an indication of potential ACRL member interest in technical services topics. An unexpected discovery was that the contributed papers became much more holistic with the arrival of the Internet and electronic resources in academic libraries and, starting with the 1999 Detroit national conference, were much more difficult to categorize into specialized niches. The author speculates that the attendance at the national conferences by a high proportion of librarians from small to mid-size academic libraries discourages papers on technical services topics since technical services librarians are more likely to work in large ARL libraries.
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002)
0.03
0.032510336 = product of:
0.097531006 = sum of:
0.03365054 = weight(_text_:services in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03365054 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.063880466 = sum of:
0.033266082 = weight(_text_:resources in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033266082 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.030614385 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030614385 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 46(2002) no.4, S.138-149
-
Holley, R.P.: Cooperative cataloging outside North America : status report 1993 (1993)
0.02
0.018672295 = product of:
0.11203376 = sum of:
0.11203376 = weight(_text_:network in 7173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203376 = score(doc=7173,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2012564 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.5566718 = fieldWeight in 7173, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7173)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a systematic investigation of cooperative cataloging outside North America. Since cooperative cataloging requires a certain level of telecommunication and computerization, most networks are found in Europe and in the Pacific Rim. With information taken from secondary sources, details relevant to cooperative cataloging are given for each network that provides this service to its members. With increased attention to document delivery and information retrieval, cooperative cataloging is less important in network formation than in the past
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The consequences of new technologies in classification and subject cataloguing in third world countries : the technological gap (1985)
0.01
0.009430585 = product of:
0.056583513 = sum of:
0.056583513 = weight(_text_:computer in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056583513 = score(doc=1733,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.34261024 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Since many nations rely upon subject headings and classification numbers from cataloguing agencies in developed countries, changes requiring computers would hinder subject access in Thrid World areas which lack high technology. New computer-supported systems such as PRECIS will probably take hold only in languages and countries where a subject analysis system does not already exist. For the traditional card catalogue-based subject access system, computer support may lead to more frequent changes in headings, less pre-coordinated structure, and the assignement of more terms per document. Third world countires may have difficulty in adapting to the developments. Classification, especially since it more easily crosses linguistc boundaries, may become to a greater degree the preferred means of subject access in Third World nations. During the transition, IFLA can serve as a forum for developing nations to make their needs known to the providers of bibliographic data
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.01
0.007779836 = product of:
0.046679016 = sum of:
0.046679016 = weight(_text_:computer in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046679016 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
-
Holley, R.P.; Killheffer, R.E.: Is there an answer to the subject access crisis? (1981)
0.01
0.006668431 = product of:
0.040010586 = sum of:
0.040010586 = weight(_text_:computer in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040010586 = score(doc=5531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress subject heading policy has been frequently criticized for using obsolete and biased terminology, for not providing subject analysis in depth, and for being overly research library oriented. While both PRECIS and the Subject Analysis Project offer possible solutions, fiscal considerations make their adoptions unlikely. By using existing computer technology, individual libraries could improve subject access by improved subject searching capabilities and by implementations of subject authority files which could tailor LC subject headings to the individual libraries' needs and provide an individualized cross-reference structure. For its part, the Library of Congress should provide an uptatable machine readable file of its complete cross-reference structure. This file should contain all references used in the Library of Congress Public Catalog since much of LC's subject heading practice is based upon its cross-reference structure. With such improvements, LC subject headings could provide much better subject access at an acceptable cost
-
Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993)
0.00
0.0035716784 = product of:
0.02143007 = sum of:
0.02143007 = product of:
0.04286014 = sum of:
0.04286014 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04286014 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
