-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.05
0.04551447 = product of:
0.13654341 = sum of:
0.047110755 = weight(_text_:services in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047110755 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.08943266 = sum of:
0.046572514 = weight(_text_:resources in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046572514 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.04286014 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04286014 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 45(2001) no.3, S.115-122
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.03
0.026110789 = product of:
0.078332365 = sum of:
0.05384086 = weight(_text_:services in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05384086 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.024491508 = product of:
0.048983015 = sum of:
0.048983015 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048983015 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.02
0.021606531 = product of:
0.06481959 = sum of:
0.049512394 = weight(_text_:network in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049512394 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2012564 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.015307193 = product of:
0.030614385 = sum of:
0.030614385 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030614385 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The structure of a classification system contributes in a variety of ways to representing semantic relationships between its topics in the context of subject authority control. We explore this claim using the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as a case study. The DDC links its classes into a notational hierarchy, supplemented by a network of relationships between topics, expressed in class descriptions and in the Relative Index (RI). Topics/subjects are expressed both by the natural language text of the caption and notes (including Manual notes) in a class description and by the controlled vocabulary of the RI's alphabetic index, which shows where topics are treated in the classificatory structure. The expression of relationships between topics depends on paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships between natural language terms in captions, notes, and RI terms; on the meaning of specific note types; and on references recorded between RI terms. The specific means used in the DDC for capturing hierarchical (including disciplinary), equivalence and associative relationships are surveyed.
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.02
0.019583093 = product of:
0.058749277 = sum of:
0.040380646 = weight(_text_:services in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040380646 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.018368632 = product of:
0.036737263 = sum of:
0.036737263 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036737263 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986)
0.02
0.016761195 = product of:
0.05028358 = sum of:
0.03365054 = weight(_text_:services in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03365054 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.016633041 = product of:
0.033266082 = sum of:
0.033266082 = weight(_text_:resources in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033266082 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 30(1986), S.109-125
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.02
0.016656032 = product of:
0.049968094 = sum of:
0.03772234 = weight(_text_:computer in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03772234 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.22840683 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.012245754 = product of:
0.024491508 = sum of:
0.024491508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024491508 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.014905443 = product of:
0.08943266 = sum of:
0.08943266 = sum of:
0.046572514 = weight(_text_:resources in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046572514 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.04286014 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04286014 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Bowker, G.C.; Star, S.L.: Sorting things out : classification and its consequences (1999)
0.01
0.013408954 = product of:
0.04022686 = sum of:
0.02692043 = weight(_text_:services in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02692043 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.013306432 = product of:
0.026612865 = sum of:
0.026612865 = weight(_text_:resources in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026612865 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.16132367 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, H.175-177 (B. Kwasnik); College and research libraries 61(2000) no.4, S.380-381 (J. Williams); Library resources and technical services 44(2000) no.4, S.107-108 (H.A. Olson); JASIST 51(2000) no.12, S.1149-1150 (T.A. Brooks)
-
Hurt, C.D.: Classification and subject analysis : looking to the future at a distance (1997)
0.01
0.013203304 = product of:
0.079219826 = sum of:
0.079219826 = weight(_text_:network in 6929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079219826 = score(doc=6929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2012564 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 6929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6929)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Classic classification schemes are uni-dimensional, with few exceptions. One of the challenges of distance education and new learning strategies is that the proliferation of course work defies the traditional categorization. The rigidity of most present classification schemes does not mesh well with the burgeoning fluidity of the academic environment. One solution is a return to a largely forgotten area of study - classification theory. Some suggestions for exploration are nonmonotonic logic systems, neural network models, and non-library models.
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.01
0.012397225 = product of:
0.037191674 = sum of:
0.028875154 = weight(_text_:computer in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028875154 = score(doc=3262,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.17483756 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.008316521 = product of:
0.016633041 = sum of:
0.016633041 = weight(_text_:resources in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016633041 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.10082729 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.1, S.62-63 (K. La Barre): "This special issue of Axiomathes presents an ambitious dual agenda. It attempts to highlight aspects of facet analysis (as used in LIS) that are shared by cognate approaches in philosophy, psychology, linguistics and computer science. Secondarily, the issue aims to attract others to the study and use of facet analysis. The authors represent a blend of lifetime involvement with facet analysis, such as Vickery, Broughton, Beghtol, and Dahlberg; those with well developed research agendas such as Tudhope, and Priss; and relative newcomers such as Gnoli, Cheti and Paradisi, and Slavic. Omissions are inescapable, but a more balanced issue would have resulted from inclusion of at least one researcher from the Indian school of facet theory. Another valuable addition might have been a reaction to the issue by one of the chief critics of facet analysis. Potentially useful, but absent, is a comprehensive bibliography of resources for those wishing to engage in further study, that now lie scattered throughout the issue. Several of the papers assume relative familiarity with facet analytical concepts and definitions, some of which are contested even within LIS. Gnoli's introduction (p. 127-130) traces the trajectory, extensions and new developments of this analytico- synthetic approach to subject access, while providing a laundry list of cognate approaches that are similar to facet analysis. This brief essay and the article by Priss (p. 243-255) directly addresses this first part of Gnoli's agenda. Priss provides detailed discussion of facet-like structures in computer science (p. 245- 246), and outlines the similarity between Formal Concept Analysis and facets. This comparison is equally fruitful for researchers in computer science and library and information science. By bridging into a discussion of visualization challenges for facet display, further research is also invited. Many of the remaining papers comprehensively detail the intellectual heritage of facet analysis (Beghtol; Broughton, p. 195-198; Dahlberg; Tudhope and Binding, p. 213-215; Vickery). Beghtol's (p. 131-144) examination of the origins of facet theory through the lens of the textbooks written by Ranganathan's mentor W.C.B. Sayers (1881-1960), Manual of Classification (1926, 1944, 1955) and a textbook written by Mills A Modern Outline of Classification (1964), serves to reveal the deep intellectual heritage of the changes in classification theory over time, as well as Ranganathan's own influence on and debt to Sayers.
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.01
0.009902478 = product of:
0.059414867 = sum of:
0.059414867 = weight(_text_:network in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059414867 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2012564 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
-
Denton, W.: Putting facets on the Web : an annotated bibliography (2003)
0.01
0.009477472 = product of:
0.028432414 = sum of:
0.016671078 = weight(_text_:computer in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016671078 = score(doc=2467,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.100942515 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
0.011761337 = product of:
0.023522673 = sum of:
0.023522673 = weight(_text_:resources in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023522673 = score(doc=2467,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.14259133 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Consider movie listings in newspapers. Most Canadian newspapers list movie showtimes in two large blocks, for the two major theatre chains. The listings are ordered by region (in large cities), then theatre, then movie, and finally by showtime. Anyone wondering where and when a particular movie is playing must scan the complete listings. Determining what movies are playing in the next half hour is very difficult. When movie listings went onto the web, most sites used a simple faceted organization, always with movie name and theatre, and perhaps with region or neighbourhood (thankfully, theatre chains were left out). They make it easy to pick a theatre and see what movies are playing there, or to pick a movie and see what theatres are showing it. To complete the system, the sites should allow users to browse by neighbourhood and showtime, and to order the results in any way they desired. Thus could people easily find answers to such questions as, "Where is the new James Bond movie playing?" "What's showing at the Roxy tonight?" "I'm going to be out in in Little Finland this afternoon with three hours to kill starting at 2 ... is anything interesting playing?" A hypertext, faceted classification system makes more useful information more easily available to the user. Reading the books and articles below in chronological order will show a certain progression: suggestions that faceting and hypertext might work well, confidence that facets would work well if only someone would make such a system, and finally the beginning of serious work on actually designing, building, and testing faceted web sites. There is a solid basis of how to make faceted classifications (see Vickery in Recommended), but their application online is just starting. Work on XFML (see Van Dijck's work in Recommended) the Exchangeable Faceted Metadata Language, will make this easier. If it follows previous patterns, parts of the Internet community will embrace the idea and make open source software available for others to reuse. It will be particularly beneficial if professionals in both information studies and computer science can work together to build working systems, standards, and code. Each can benefit from the other's expertise in what can be a very complicated and technical area. One particularly nice thing about this area of research is that people interested in combining facets and the web often have web sites where they post their writings.
This bibliography is not meant to be exhaustive, but unfortunately it is not as complete as I wanted. Some books and articles are not be included, but they may be used in my future work. (These include two books and one article by B.C. Vickery: Faceted Classification Schemes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 1966), Classification and Indexing in Science, 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1975), and "Knowledge Representation: A Brief Review" (Journal of Documentation 42 no. 3 (September 1986): 145-159; and A.C. Foskett's "The Future of Faceted Classification" in The Future of Classification, edited by Rita Marcella and Arthur Maltby (Aldershot, England: Gower, 2000): 69-80). Nevertheless, I hope this bibliography will be useful for those both new to or familiar with faceted hypertext systems. Some very basic resources are listed, as well as some very advanced ones. Some example web sites are mentioned, but there is no detailed technical discussion of any software. The user interface to any web site is extremely important, and this is briefly mentioned in two or three places (for example the discussion of lawforwa.org (see Example Web Sites)). The larger question of how to display information graphically and with hypertext is outside the scope of this bibliography. There are five sections: Recommended, Background, Not Relevant, Example Web Sites, and Mailing Lists. Background material is either introductory, advanced, or of peripheral interest, and can be read after the Recommended resources if the reader wants to know more. The Not Relevant category contains articles that may appear in bibliographies but are not relevant for my purposes.
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.008517396 = product of:
0.051104374 = sum of:
0.051104374 = sum of:
0.026612865 = weight(_text_:resources in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026612865 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.16132367 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.024491508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024491508 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Zackland, M.; Fontaine, D.: Systematic building of conceptual classification systems with C-KAT (1996)
0.01
0.007779836 = product of:
0.046679016 = sum of:
0.046679016 = weight(_text_:computer in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046679016 = score(doc=5145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- International journal of human-computer studies. 44(1996) no.5, S.603-627
-
Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012)
0.01
0.006737536 = product of:
0.040425215 = sum of:
0.040425215 = weight(_text_:computer in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040425215 = score(doc=1782,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.24477258 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
- LCSH
- Computer science
- Subject
- Computer science
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993)
0.01
0.0067301076 = product of:
0.040380646 = sum of:
0.040380646 = weight(_text_:services in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040380646 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
-
Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006)
0.01
0.0067301076 = product of:
0.040380646 = sum of:
0.040380646 = weight(_text_:services in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040380646 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization systems and services"
-
Batty, D.: ¬The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research (1989)
0.01
0.006668431 = product of:
0.040010586 = sum of:
0.040010586 = weight(_text_:computer in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040010586 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16515417 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.0061228774 = product of:
0.036737263 = sum of:
0.036737263 = product of:
0.07347453 = sum of:
0.07347453 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07347453 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.0061228774 = product of:
0.036737263 = sum of:
0.036737263 = product of:
0.07347453 = sum of:
0.07347453 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07347453 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191888 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
