-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.04
0.040358387 = product of:
0.080716774 = sum of:
0.080716774 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042324673 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.587-595
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.03
0.033631988 = product of:
0.067263976 = sum of:
0.067263976 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03527056 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.217-229
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.021162337 = product of:
0.042324673 = sum of:
0.042324673 = product of:
0.08464935 = sum of:
0.08464935 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08464935 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Statistical tests and research assessments : a comment on Schneider (2012) (2013)
0.02
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = product of:
0.07678419 = sum of:
0.07678419 = weight(_text_:society in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07678419 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.44218642 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1306-1308
-
Bornmann, L.: What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? : a literature survey (2013)
0.02
0.016624266 = product of:
0.033248533 = sum of:
0.033248533 = product of:
0.066497065 = sum of:
0.066497065 = weight(_text_:society in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066497065 = score(doc=606,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.3829447 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Since the 1990s, the scope of research evaluations becomes broader as the societal products (outputs), societal use (societal references), and societal benefits (changes in society) of research come into scope. Society can reap the benefits of successful research studies only if the results are converted into marketable and consumable products (e.g., medicaments, diagnostic tools, machines, and devices) or services. A series of different names have been introduced which refer to the societal impact of research: third stream activities, societal benefits, societal quality, usefulness, public values, knowledge transfer, and societal relevance. What most of these names are concerned with is the assessment of social, cultural, environmental, and economic returns (impact and effects) from results (research output) or products (research outcome) of publicly funded research. This review intends to present existing research on and practices employed in the assessment of societal impact in the form of a literature survey. The objective is for this review to serve as a basis for the development of robust and reliable methods of societal impact measurement.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.217-233
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.014108225 = product of:
0.02821645 = sum of:
0.02821645 = product of:
0.0564329 = sum of:
0.0564329 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564329 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
0.01
0.01131138 = product of:
0.02262276 = sum of:
0.02262276 = product of:
0.04524552 = sum of:
0.04524552 = weight(_text_:society in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04524552 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.26056084 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In bibliometrics, the association of "impact" with central-tendency statistics is mistaken. Impacts add up, and citation curves therefore should be integrated instead of averaged. For example, the journals MIS Quarterly and Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology differ by a factor of 2 in terms of their respective impact factors (IF), but the journal with the lower IF has the higher impact. Using percentile ranks (e.g., top-1%, top-10%, etc.), an Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) can be based on integration of the citation curves, but after normalization of the citation curves to the same scale. The results across document sets can be compared as percentages of the total impact of a reference set. Total number of citations, however, should not be used instead because the shape of the citation curves is then not appreciated. I3 can be applied to any document set and any citation window. The results of the integration (summation) are fully decomposable in terms of journals or institutional units such as nations, universities, and so on because percentile ranks are determined at the paper level. In this study, we first compare I3 with IFs for the journals in two Institute for Scientific Information subject categories ("Information Science & Library Science" and "Multidisciplinary Sciences"). The library and information science set is additionally decomposed in terms of nations. Policy implications of this possible paradigm shift in citation impact analysis are specified.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2133-2146
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1381-1385
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.010581168 = product of:
0.021162337 = sum of:
0.021162337 = product of:
0.042324673 = sum of:
0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042324673 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Opthof, T.: Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time : principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1370-1381
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=4767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1954-1962
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps (2012)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1442-1458
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2299-2309
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2310-2316
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
0.01
0.0090491045 = product of:
0.018098209 = sum of:
0.018098209 = product of:
0.036196418 = sum of:
0.036196418 = weight(_text_:society in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036196418 = score(doc=2381,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.20844868 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: Erratum Re: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Agewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(2008) no.12, S.2037-2038.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1841-1852
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1100-1107
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? : a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.830-837
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1286-1289
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1664-1670
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2061-20690
