-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.04
0.04093676 = product of:
0.08187352 = sum of:
0.08187352 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.049880106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049880106 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.434-442
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.04
0.040358387 = product of:
0.080716774 = sum of:
0.080716774 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042324673 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.406-418
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.04
0.040358387 = product of:
0.080716774 = sum of:
0.080716774 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042324673 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a new source of evidence of the value of medical-related research: citations from clinical guidelines. These give evidence that research findings have been used to inform the day-to-day practice of medical staff. To identify whether citations from guidelines can give different information from that of traditional citation counts, this article assesses the extent to which references in clinical guidelines tend to be highly cited in the academic literature and highly read in Mendeley. Using evidence from the United Kingdom, references associated with the UK's National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines tended to be substantially more cited than comparable articles, unless they had been published in the most recent 3 years. Citation counts also seemed to be stronger indicators than Mendeley readership altmetrics. Hence, although presence in guidelines may be particularly useful to highlight the contributions of recently published articles, for older articles citation counts may already be sufficient to recognize their contributions to health in society.
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.04
0.040258043 = product of:
0.080516085 = sum of:
0.080516085 = sum of:
0.04524552 = weight(_text_:society in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04524552 = score(doc=4200,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.26056084 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03527056 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch das Erratum in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.419
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2544-2558
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.03
0.033631988 = product of:
0.067263976 = sum of:
0.067263976 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03527056 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1631-1644
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.03
0.033631988 = product of:
0.067263976 = sum of:
0.067263976 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03527056 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.805-816
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.014108225 = product of:
0.02821645 = sum of:
0.02821645 = product of:
0.0564329 = sum of:
0.0564329 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564329 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Thelwall, M.: Homophily in MySpace (2009)
0.01
0.013573657 = product of:
0.027147314 = sum of:
0.027147314 = product of:
0.054294627 = sum of:
0.054294627 = weight(_text_:society in 2706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054294627 = score(doc=2706,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.31267303 = fieldWeight in 2706, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2706)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Social network sites like MySpace are increasingly important environments for expressing and maintaining interpersonal connections, but does online communication exacerbate or ameliorate the known tendency for offline friendships to form between similar people (homophily)? This article reports an exploratory study of the similarity between the reported attributes of pairs of active MySpace Friends based upon a systematic sample of 2,567 members joining on June 18, 2007 and Friends who commented on their profile. The results showed no evidence of gender homophily but significant evidence of homophily for ethnicity, religion, age, country, marital status, attitude towards children, sexual orientation, and reason for joining MySpace. There were also some imbalances: women and the young were disproportionately commenters, and commenters tended to have more Friends than commentees. Overall, it seems that although traditional sources of homophily are thriving in MySpace networks of active public connections, gender homophily has completely disappeared. Finally, the method used has wide potential for investigating and partially tracking homophily in society, providing early warning of socially divisive trends.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.2, S.219-231
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: Webometrics : an introduction to the special issue (2004)
0.01
0.012797366 = product of:
0.025594732 = sum of:
0.025594732 = product of:
0.051189464 = sum of:
0.051189464 = weight(_text_:society in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189464 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.29479095 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1213-1215
-
Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.594-602
-
Price, L.; Thelwall, M.: ¬The clustering power of low frequency words in academic webs (2005)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.883-888
-
Thelwall, M.; Stuart, D.: Web crawling ethics revisited : cost, privacy, and denial of service (2006)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 6098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=6098,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 6098, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6098)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1771-1779
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: ¬A modelling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns : the case of Canadian universities (2005)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 1014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=1014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 1014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1014)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hyperlink patterns between Canadian university Web sites were analyzed by a mathematical modeling approach. A multiple regression model was developed which shows that faculty quality and the language of the university are important predictors for links to a university Web site. Higher faculty quality means more links. French universities received lower numbers of links to their Web sites than comparable English universities. Analysis of interlinking between pairs of universities also showed that English universities are advantaged. Universities are more likely to link to each other when the geographical distance between them is less than 3000 km, possibly reflecting the east vs. west divide that exists in Canadian society.
-
Thelwall, M.; Wouters, P.; Fry, J.: Information-centered research for large-scale analyses of new information sources (2008)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1523-1527
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.010581168 = product of:
0.021162337 = sum of:
0.021162337 = product of:
0.042324673 = sum of:
0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042324673 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.010581168 = product of:
0.021162337 = sum of:
0.021162337 = product of:
0.042324673 = sum of:
0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042324673 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.: Graph structure in three national academic Webs : power laws with anomalies (2003)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 1681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=1681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 1681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.706-712
-
Thelwall, M.: Text characteristics of English language university Web sites (2005)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 3463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=3463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 3463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.6, S.609-619
-
Thelwall, M.: Interpreting social science link analysis research : a theoretical framework (2006)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 4908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=4908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 4908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4908)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.1, S.60-68
-
Thelwall, M.; Price, L.: Language evolution and the spread of ideas on the Web : a procedure for identifying emergent hybrid word (2006)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=5896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1326-1337
