Search (182 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001) 0.05
    0.04830965 = product of:
      0.0966193 = sum of:
        0.0966193 = sum of:
          0.054294627 = weight(_text_:society in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054294627 = score(doc=5589,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.31267303 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042324673 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der vollständige Projektname von Renardus lautet "Academic Subject Gateway Service Europe". Renardus wird von der Europäischen Union im 5. Rahmenprogramm mit dem Schwerpunktthema "Information Society Technologies" im zweiten Thematischen Programm "Benutzerfreundliche Informationsgesellschaft" ('Promoting a User-friendly Information Society') gefördert. Die Projektlaufzeit ist von Januar 2000 bis Juni 2002. Insgesamt zwölf Partner (Principal und Assistant Contractors) aus Finnland, Dänemark, Schweden, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden, Frankreich und Deutschland beteiligen sich an diesem Projekt. Die Europäische Union unterstützt das Projekt mit 1,7 Mio. EURO, die Gesamtkosten belaufen sich inklusive der Eigenbeteiligungen der Partner auf 2,3 Mio. EURO. Das Ziel des Projektes Renardus ist es, über eine Schnittstelle Zugriff auf verteilte Sammlungen von "High Quality" Internet Ressourcen in Europa zu ermöglichen. Diese Schnittstelle wird über den Renardus Broker realisiert, der das "Cross-Searchen" und "Cross-Browsen" über verteilte "Quality-Controlled Subject Gateways" ermöglicht. Ein weiteres Ziel von Renardus ist es, Möglichkeiten von "metadata sharing" zu evaluieren und in kleinen Experimenten zwischen z. B. Subject Gateways und Nationalbibliothek zu testen bzw. zu realisieren
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:32:15
  2. Cho, H.; Chen, M.-H.; Chung, S.: Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia (2010) 0.04
    0.040358387 = product of:
      0.080716774 = sum of:
        0.080716774 = sum of:
          0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038392097 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
          0.042324673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042324673 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 10:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1198-1212
  3. Hill, L.L.; Zheng, Q.: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library : Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers (1999) 0.04
    0.040258043 = product of:
      0.080516085 = sum of:
        0.080516085 = sum of:
          0.04524552 = weight(_text_:society in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04524552 = score(doc=6543,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.26056084 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
          0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03527056 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:22:45
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  4. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.03
    0.034916077 = product of:
      0.06983215 = sum of:
        0.06983215 = product of:
          0.1396643 = sum of:
            0.1396643 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1396643 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
  5. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03
    0.03445554 = product of:
      0.06891108 = sum of:
        0.06891108 = product of:
          0.20673324 = sum of:
            0.20673324 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20673324 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4414091 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  6. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.033631988 = product of:
      0.067263976 = sum of:
        0.067263976 = sum of:
          0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031993415 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03527056 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
  7. Chylkowska, E.: Implementation of information exchange : online dictionaries (2005) 0.03
    0.033631988 = product of:
      0.067263976 = sum of:
        0.067263976 = sum of:
          0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031993415 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
          0.03527056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03527056 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We are living in a society in which using Internet is a part of everyday life. People use Internet at schools, universities, at work in small and big companies. The Web gives huge number of information from every possible field of knowledge, and one of the problems that one can face by searching through the web is the fact that this information may be written in many different languages that one does not understand. That is why web site designers came up with an idea to create on-line dictionaries to make surfing on the Web easier. The most popular are bilingual dictionaries (in Poland the most known are: LING.pl, LEKSYKA.pl, and Dict.pl), but one can find also multilingual ones (Logos.com, Lexicool.com). Nowadays, when using Internet in education becomes more and more popular, on-line dictionaries are the best supplement for a good quality work. The purpose of this paper is to present, compare and recommend the best (from the author's point of view) multilingual dictionaries that can be found on the Internet and that can serve educational purposes well.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:05:56
  8. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.03
    0.02821645 = product of:
      0.0564329 = sum of:
        0.0564329 = product of:
          0.1128658 = sum of:
            0.1128658 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1128658 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
  9. Fallis, D.: Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia (2008) 0.03
    0.02690559 = product of:
      0.05381118 = sum of:
        0.05381118 = sum of:
          0.025594732 = weight(_text_:society in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025594732 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.14739548 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
          0.02821645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02821645 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05206517 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia (the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this article argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., Web sites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This article suggests that to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does. Somebody who reads Wikipedia is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom, says Mr. McHenry, Britannica's former editor. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him. One wonders whether people like Mr. McHenry would prefer there to be no public lavatories at all. The Economist (Vol. 379, April 22, 2006, pp. 14-15)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.10, S.1662-1674
  10. Rowley, J.: Current awareness in an electronic age (1998) 0.02
    0.024940053 = product of:
      0.049880106 = sum of:
        0.049880106 = product of:
          0.09976021 = sum of:
            0.09976021 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09976021 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 17:50:37
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279
  11. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024940053 = product of:
      0.049880106 = sum of:
        0.049880106 = product of:
          0.09976021 = sum of:
            0.09976021 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09976021 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  12. Grobe, K.: Da wird die Goldprägung blaß : Lehrt die Konkurrenz das Fürchten: Die Encarta-Enzyklopädie von Microsoft (1998) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 7133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=7133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7133)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  13. Wollschläger, H.: Welt-Archiv der Vergangenheit (1994) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 8997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=8997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Süddeutsche Zeitung. Nr.xx vom 21./22./23.5.1994, S
  14. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  15. Schult, T.J.: World Book 1999 (1999) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1999 12:36:22
  16. Oehlen, M.: Unser Wissen im Strudel der Zeit : 20. Auflage des 'Brockhaus' in neuer Rechtschreibung (1997) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 1.1997 12:15:22
  17. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54
  18. Gersmann, G.; Dörr, M.: ¬Der Server Frühe Neuzeit als Baustein für eine Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Geschichte (2001) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2001 11:57:52
  19. Subject gateways (2000) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  20. Schininà, A.: Literatur im Internet (2001) 0.02
    0.024689393 = product of:
      0.049378786 = sum of:
        0.049378786 = product of:
          0.09875757 = sum of:
            0.09875757 = weight(_text_:22 in 6879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09875757 = score(doc=6879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05206517 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2001, Nr.70, S.22-36 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 54(2001) H.2/3]

Years

Languages

  • d 101
  • e 80

Types

  • a 160
  • i 14
  • el 12
  • m 8
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications