Search (229 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Chaudhry, A.A.: Adapting CDS/ISIS to index hyphenated and numeric words and incorporating case sensitive storage and retrieval (1990) 0.19
    0.1945354 = product of:
      0.45391595 = sum of:
        0.23168428 = weight(_text_:storage in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23168428 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
        0.07140262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07140262 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
        0.15082905 = weight(_text_:case in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15082905 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19407132 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.7771836 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
  2. Sugano, I.: ¬The study of criteria for evaluating OPACs as information retrieval systems (1996) 0.18
    0.18194489 = product of:
      0.31840354 = sum of:
        0.16382553 = weight(_text_:storage in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16382553 = score(doc=1626,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.68110555 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.07140262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07140262 = score(doc=1626,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.052113127 = weight(_text_:systems in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052113127 = score(doc=1626,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.031062277 = product of:
          0.062124554 = sum of:
            0.062124554 = weight(_text_:studies in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062124554 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044143092 = queryNorm
                0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Most of the criteria proposed to date for the evaluation of OPACs focus on evaluation of their retrieval function. Argues that the storage function is more important because the quality of information retrieval systems is dependent on the quality of stored information as well as the description and depth of indexing of stored information. States that OPACs should therefore be evaluated from the perspectives of both storage and retrieval functions. Examines 4 studies on criteria for evaluating OPACs and suggests a new evaluation framework based on the work of C.R. Hildreth
  3. Borko, H.: Determining user requirements for an information storage and retrieval system : a systems approach (1962) 0.17
    0.17456278 = product of:
      0.40731317 = sum of:
        0.23168428 = weight(_text_:storage in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23168428 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
        0.07140262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07140262 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
        0.104226254 = weight(_text_:systems in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104226254 = score(doc=4980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.76829356 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Information systems workshop
  4. Goffman, W.; Newill, V.A.: ¬A methodology for test and evaluation of information retrieval systems (1966/67) 0.17
    0.1741551 = product of:
      0.4063619 = sum of:
        0.23168428 = weight(_text_:storage in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23168428 = score(doc=1310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
        0.10097854 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10097854 = score(doc=1310,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
        0.07369909 = weight(_text_:systems in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07369909 = score(doc=1310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1966/67), S.19-26
  5. Chen, Z.: ¬A conceptual model for storage and retrieval of short scientific texts (1993) 0.17
    0.17194663 = product of:
      0.4012088 = sum of:
        0.2047819 = weight(_text_:storage in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2047819 = score(doc=2715,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.85138196 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
        0.06311159 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06311159 = score(doc=2715,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
        0.1333153 = weight(_text_:case in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1333153 = score(doc=2715,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19407132 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.6869397 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    A conceptual model for integrating short scientific texts is described, which extends classical text storage and retrieval. A brief comparison with related approaches (such as case-based reasoning and classification-based reasoning) is also provided
    Theme
    Case Based Reasoning
  6. Devadason, F.J.; Kumbhar, M.R.: Language and indexing language : Nalimor and Gardin revised (1988) 0.17
    0.1673166 = product of:
      0.29280403 = sum of:
        0.14480267 = weight(_text_:storage in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14480267 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.60201794 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
        0.06311159 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06311159 = score(doc=2852,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
        0.04606193 = weight(_text_:systems in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04606193 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.339541 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
        0.038827848 = product of:
          0.077655695 = sum of:
            0.077655695 = weight(_text_:studies in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077655695 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044143092 = queryNorm
                0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Studies the salient features of ordinary language as a means of designing languages for information storage and retrieval systems. Pays particular attention to the POPSI (Postulate-based Permuted Subject Indexing) language.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Azubuike, A.A.; Umoh, J.S.: Computerized information storage and retrieval systems (1988) 0.16
    0.16147971 = product of:
      0.376786 = sum of:
        0.23168428 = weight(_text_:storage in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23168428 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
        0.07140262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07140262 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
        0.07369909 = weight(_text_:systems in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07369909 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
  8. Fugmann, R.: On the role of subjectivity in establishing, using, operating and evaluating information retrieval systems : treatise 2 on information retrieval theory (1973) 0.16
    0.16089612 = product of:
      0.3754243 = sum of:
        0.20272374 = weight(_text_:storage in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20272374 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.8428251 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.108213834 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108213834 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.064486705 = weight(_text_:systems in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064486705 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.353-372
  9. Buckland, M.; Plaunt, C.: On the construction of selection systems (1994) 0.16
    0.15895332 = product of:
      0.3708911 = sum of:
        0.2047819 = weight(_text_:storage in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2047819 = score(doc=2221,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.85138196 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
        0.06311159 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06311159 = score(doc=2221,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
        0.10299761 = weight(_text_:systems in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10299761 = score(doc=2221,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.75923675 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the structure and components of information storage and retrieval systems and information searching and filtering systems and analyzes the tasks performed in these systems. Argues that all information storage and retrieval systems can be represented by combinations of these components
  10. Kemp, D.A.: Relevance, pertinence and information system development (1974) 0.16
    0.15675376 = product of:
      0.27431908 = sum of:
        0.14480267 = weight(_text_:storage in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14480267 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.60201794 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
        0.044626635 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044626635 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
        0.04606193 = weight(_text_:systems in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04606193 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.339541 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
        0.038827848 = product of:
          0.077655695 = sum of:
            0.077655695 = weight(_text_:studies in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077655695 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044143092 = queryNorm
                0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The difference between pertinence and relevance is discussed. Other pairs of terms and the differences between their members are examined, and the suggestion is made that such studies could increase our understanding of the theory of information systems, and thence lead to practical improvements.
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 10(1974), S.37-47
  11. Gibb, F.; Smart, G.: Expert systems and information storage and retrieval (1991) 0.15
    0.15238573 = product of:
      0.35556668 = sum of:
        0.20272374 = weight(_text_:storage in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20272374 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.8428251 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
        0.08835622 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08835622 = score(doc=4425,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
        0.064486705 = weight(_text_:systems in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064486705 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Online information retrieval today and tomorrow. Ed.: C. Armstrong et al
  12. Wijnhoven. F.; Wognum, P.M.; Weg, R.L.W. van de: Knowledge ontology development (1996) 0.15
    0.14921069 = product of:
      0.20889495 = sum of:
        0.07240134 = weight(_text_:storage in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07240134 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.30100897 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.022313317 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022313317 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.032570705 = weight(_text_:systems in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032570705 = score(doc=907,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.06665765 = weight(_text_:case in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06665765 = score(doc=907,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19407132 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.34346986 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.01495195 = product of:
          0.0299039 = sum of:
            0.0299039 = weight(_text_:22 in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0299039 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15458159 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044143092 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge-containing documents and data about knowledge have been handled in stable environments by bureaucratic systems using very stable knowledge ontologies. These systems, though not always very effective in such environments, will become highly ineffective in environments where knowledge has to be updated and replaced frequently. Moreover, organizations in such dynamic environments also use knowledge from extemal resources extensively. This makes the development of a stable ontology for knowledge storage and retrieval particularly complicated. This paper describes eight context classes of knowledge ontology development and explores elements of a method for ontology development. These classes are based an the differences in contexts defined along three dimensions: knowledge dynamics, complexity and social dispersion. Ontology development matches these contexts and ontology needs defined by (logical and social) structure and ontology maturity. The classification framework and methodology are applied to two cases. The first case illustrates a descriptive use of our framework to characterize ontology development in an academic environment. The second case illustrates a normative use of our framework. The method proposed seemed to be empirically valid and rich and be useful for detecting options for ontology improvement.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  13. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.15
    0.1488081 = product of:
      0.3472189 = sum of:
        0.2047819 = weight(_text_:storage in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2047819 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.85138196 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.0772956 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0772956 = score(doc=4931,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.06514141 = weight(_text_:systems in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06514141 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
  14. Shaw, R.R.: Mechanical storage, handling, retrieval and supply of information (1958) 0.15
    0.14754653 = product of:
      0.25820643 = sum of:
        0.14334734 = weight(_text_:storage in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14334734 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.59596735 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
        0.04417811 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04417811 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
        0.032243352 = weight(_text_:systems in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032243352 = score(doc=697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
        0.03843761 = product of:
          0.07687522 = sum of:
            0.07687522 = weight(_text_:studies in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07687522 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17614305 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044143092 = queryNorm
                0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The technical and administrative problems involved in the storage, handling, and retrieval of library information are emphasized throughout this detailed account of the present equipment used. Reference is made to previous studies and suggestions given for future research. Particular attention is paid to the need for fundamental systems studies and for full investigation of the requirements of the scholar. The author concludes that the problem was proceeded in a piecemeal and 'gadget' fashion and stresses the need for more detailed analysis of the usefulness and economic justification of each separate piece of machinery, without, however, losing sight of the problem in its entirely. By way of practical illustration a method for making the recources of Harvard University's Lamont Library available to all colleges is suggested at the end.
  15. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Haak, P.H.; Nieuwenhuysen, P.; Scheepsma, G.M.A.; Veeger, L.; Vis, G.C.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : Pt. 2: Classical retrieval systems (1991) 0.13
    0.13061632 = product of:
      0.30477142 = sum of:
        0.17376322 = weight(_text_:storage in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17376322 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.7224215 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.07573391 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07573391 = score(doc=5047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.055274315 = weight(_text_:systems in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055274315 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
  16. Case, D.O.: Conceptual organization and retrieval of text by historians : the role of memory and metaphor (1991) 0.13
    0.1290328 = product of:
      0.30107653 = sum of:
        0.16382553 = weight(_text_:storage in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16382553 = score(doc=3013,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.68110555 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.06183648 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06183648 = score(doc=3013,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.07541452 = weight(_text_:case in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07541452 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19407132 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The article suggests how future models of text storage and retrieval can be informed by research on subject aspects of cognition; future designs may draw upon cognitice theories of categorization and metaphor to understand how users interact with text, both paper and electronic. The results from the study of 20 American historians imply the importance of metaphors for storage and retrieval of documents
  17. Sieverts, E.G.; Zwart, B.D.: ¬A picture of retrieval software for systems with images (1994) 0.12
    0.12472056 = product of:
      0.29101464 = sum of:
        0.17556392 = weight(_text_:storage in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17556392 = score(doc=1960,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.729908 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
        0.069851734 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069851734 = score(doc=1960,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
        0.045598987 = weight(_text_:systems in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045598987 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The many techniques developed for the storage and retrieval of textual information have also become available for the storage and retrieval of graphics and images in various kinds of database systems. Of the many existing software packages for information storage and retrieval, a fast growing number offer the possibility of storing images. As part of a software evaluation project, criteria for the evaluation of image capabiblities of retrieval software packages are listed and these criteria are used to report on the graphical capabilities of the following software packages: Advision, askSam, Cardbox for Windows, FolioViews, IdeaList, Inmagic-Image, KAware, Personal Librarian and ZyImage
  18. Masiero, P.C.: Authoring and searching in dynamically growing hypertext databases (1994) 0.11
    0.11418339 = product of:
      0.2664279 = sum of:
        0.16382553 = weight(_text_:storage in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16382553 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.68110555 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
        0.05048927 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05048927 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
        0.052113127 = weight(_text_:systems in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052113127 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Shows how an application in office information systems can be modelled so that a dynamically growing database of hypertext documents is created and automatically extended, as well as easily searched. Proposes a method for analyzing office applications which relies on a model based on statecharts to record the flow of documents within the system. A prototype implementation is described of a hypertext system to support the creation, storage and retrieval of documents associated with formal face to face meetings. Special features to be incorporated into hypertext systems aimed at supporting the storage and retrieval of office documents are also identified
  19. Hoogeveen, M.J.; Meer, K. van der: Integration of information retrieval and database management in support of multimedia police work (1994) 0.11
    0.11214504 = product of:
      0.26167175 = sum of:
        0.14334734 = weight(_text_:storage in 7149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14334734 = score(doc=7149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.59596735 = fieldWeight in 7149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7149)
        0.062477287 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062477287 = score(doc=7149,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7149, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7149)
        0.055847123 = weight(_text_:systems in 7149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055847123 = score(doc=7149,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 7149, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7149)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Database management systems (DBMSs) are a major component of most information systems (ISs). The relational DBMS is nowadays by the far most widely accepted DBMS, although many large non-relational DBMSs are still in use, and object oriented DBMSs are developing. Besides, more and more DBMSs are supporting basic multimedia storage and retrieval facilieties. Nevertheless, advanced information retrieval facilities, especially for accessing large document and text databases, are still the almost exclusive domain of information storage and retrieval systems (IRSs). A growing need is identified to integrate the facilities of a DBMS and an IRS in order to fully support work with multiple data types, like multimedia police work. For Dutch police departments, a criminal investigation system is developed, fully integrating both types of facilities
  20. Almerri, J.; McGregor, D.R.: Codon signatures : a document retrieval method (1996) 0.11
    0.10990515 = product of:
      0.19233401 = sum of:
        0.08688161 = weight(_text_:storage in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08688161 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24052884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.36121076 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.059872914 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059872914 = score(doc=6970,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1335291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.027637158 = weight(_text_:systems in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027637158 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13565941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044143092 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.01794234 = product of:
          0.03588468 = sum of:
            0.03588468 = weight(_text_:22 in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03588468 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15458159 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044143092 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The performance of an information retrieval system depends on its ability to distinguish between relevant and non relevant documents in response to users' information needs. Proposes a new method called Codon Signatures (CS) that is able to use a relationship between terms and concepts. The Codon Signature is designed to improve retrieval performance (recall and precision) by creating the Codon structure, a representation of semantic meaning in context. It is also designed to reduce the amount of storage space required by the index. Presents a theoretical analysis of CS paprameters and performance. The method was tested against 3 document base collections and gave acceptable results regarding information effectiveness and efficiency, compared to a conventional Signature Files method
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Authors

Languages

Types