Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  1. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.09
    0.08809096 = product of:
      0.17618193 = sum of:
        0.08440357 = weight(_text_:storage in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08440357 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.36121076 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
        0.026012275 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026012275 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
        0.06576608 = weight(_text_:systems in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06576608 = score(doc=2028,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.4990213 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice
  2. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.09
    0.08523095 = product of:
      0.1704619 = sum of:
        0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112538084 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.034683034 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034683034 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.023240782 = product of:
          0.046481565 = sum of:
            0.046481565 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046481565 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1501726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04288404 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  3. Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997) 0.07
    0.07437339 = product of:
      0.22312015 = sum of:
        0.17055647 = weight(_text_:storage in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17055647 = score(doc=5844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.729908 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
        0.052563682 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052563682 = score(doc=5844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The arts, humanities, and social sciences commonly borrow concepts and methods from the sciences, but interdisciplinary borrowing seldom occurs in the opposite direction. Research on narrative discourse is relevant to problems of documentary storage and retrieval, for the arts and humanities in particular, but also for other broad areas of knowledge. This paper views the potential application of narrative discourse analysis to information storage and retrieval problems from 2 perspectives: 1) analysis and comparison of narrative documents in all disciplines may be simplified if fundamental categories that occur in narrative documents can be isolated; and 2) the possibility of subdividing the world of knowledge initially into narrative and non-narrative documents is explored with particular attention to Werlich's work on text types