Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.10125626 = product of:
  0.20251252 = sum of:
    0.13925877 = weight(_text_:storage in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13925877 = score(doc=870,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.59596735 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
    0.042918064 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042918064 = score(doc=870,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
    0.020335684 = product of:
      0.040671367 = sum of:
        0.040671367 = weight(_text_:22 in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040671367 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1501726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Content

Bezugnahme auf Brunt, R.: Information storage and retrieval in the professional curriculum, Spring, 1980 [Wiederabdruck]: in: Library review. 56(2007) no.7, S.552-556.

Date

23.12.2007 18:40:22

0.09869291 = product of:
  0.19738582 = sum of:
    0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112538084 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
    0.049049217 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049049217 = score(doc=538,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
    0.03579852 = weight(_text_:systems in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03579852 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract

Subject access to information is recognized as one of the most important features of information storage and retrieval systems. It is a feature which requires information professionals to have expertise in retrieval, subject cataloging, classification, indexing and system design. This essay examines the knowledge base needed for professional careers in the subject control of information. It identifies some of the problems involved in education and training graduates for working in this area and attempts to pose some solutions to these problems

0.06072561 = product of:
  0.18217683 = sum of:
    0.13925877 = weight(_text_:storage in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13925877 = score(doc=866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.59596735 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
    0.042918064 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042918064 = score(doc=866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Purpose - To reflect on the importance of information storage and retrieval in the library curriculum in the 1980s. Design/methodology/approach - The article provides a reflective viewpoint. Findings - That cataloguing and classification was a vital skill for librarians to have, and that any moves to reduce it from the library school curriculum should be avoided. Practical implications - Should be of interest to anyone interested in the historical competencies of librarianship and how they have been debated. Originality/value - Offers an interesting insight into historical discussions relating to an aspect of library education.

0.049073707 = product of:
  0.14722112 = sum of:
    0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112538084 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
    0.034683034 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034683034 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

traditionally, librarianship, archives management, and records management have functioned largely as autonomous disciplines. However, economic, technological and higher education trends conspire against continued, possibly self defeating, claims to uniqueness. Areas of convergence include the information life cycle concept, gatekeepers, information storage and retrieval, information representation, assistive and instructional roles, ethics, and custodial and preservation concerns. Suggests implications for education and research in an emerging field of 'information management' or information studies