Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.09892394 = product of:
  0.19784787 = sum of:
    0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112538084 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
    0.034683034 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034683034 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
    0.050626755 = weight(_text_:systems in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050626755 = score(doc=5059,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract

Thesauri have been used in the library and information science field to provide a standard descriptor language for indexers or searchers to use in an informations storage and retrieval system. One difficulty has been the maintenance and updating of thesauri since terms used to describe concepts change over time and vary between users. This study investigates a mechanism by which thesauri can be updated and maintained using citation, co-citation analysis and citation context analysis.

0.06863237 = product of:
  0.13726474 = sum of:
    0.08440357 = weight(_text_:storage in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08440357 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.36121076 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
    0.026012275 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026012275 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
    0.026848892 = weight(_text_:systems in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026848892 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract

This study employed the Perl program, Excel software, and some bibliometric techniques to investigate growth pattern, journal characteristics, and author productivity of the subject indexing literature from 1977 to 2000, based an the subject search of a descriptor field in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database. The literature growth from 1977 to 2000 in subject indexing could be fitted well by the logistic curve. The Bradford plot of journal literature fits the typical Bradford-Zipf S-shaped curve. Twenty core journals making a significant contribution could be identified from the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Four major research topics in the area of subject indexing were identified as: (1) information organization, (2) information processing, (3) information storage and retrieval, and (4) information systems and services. It was also found that a vast majority of authors (76.7%) contributed only one article, which is a much larger percentage than the 60% of original Lotka's data. The 15 most productive authors and the key concepts of their research were identified.

0.061683074 = product of:
  0.12336615 = sum of:
    0.070336305 = weight(_text_:storage in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070336305 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.30100897 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
    0.03065576 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03065576 = score(doc=294,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
    0.022374075 = weight(_text_:systems in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022374075 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to explore the journal bibliometric characteristics of the Journal of Documentation (JOD) and the subject relationship with other disciplines by citation analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The citation data were drawn from references of each article of JOD during 1998 and 2008. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, Library of Congress Subject Heading, retrieved from the WorldCat and LISA database were used to identify the main class, subclass and subject of cited journals and books. Findings - The results of this study revealed that journal articles are the most cited document, followed by books and book chapters, electronic resources, and conference proceedings, respectively. The three main classes of cited journals in JOD papers are library science, science, and social sciences. The three subclasses of non-LIS journals that were highly cited in JOD papers are Science, "Mathematics. Computer science", and "Industries. Land use. Labor". The three highly cited subjects of library and information science journals encompass searching, information work, and online information retrieval. The most cited main class of books in JOD papers is library and information science, followed by social sciences, science, "Philosophy. Psychology. Religion." The three highly cited subclasses of books in JOD papers are "Books (General). Writing. Paleography. Book industries and trade. Libraries. Bibliography," "Philology and linguistics," and Science, and the most cited subject of books is information storage and retrieval systems. Originality/value - Results for the present research found that information science, as represented by JOD, is a developing discipline with an expanding literature relating to multiple subject areas.

0.061683074 = product of:
  0.12336615 = sum of:
    0.070336305 = weight(_text_:storage in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070336305 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.30100897 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
    0.03065576 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03065576 = score(doc=1309,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
    0.022374075 = weight(_text_:systems in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022374075 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract

This article first analyzes library and information science (LIS) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information-service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information-service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information-service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.

0.030671068 = product of:
  0.0920132 = sum of:
    0.070336305 = weight(_text_:storage in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070336305 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.30100897 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
    0.021676896 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021676896 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04288404 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Purpose This paper analyses the research in Library and Information Science (LIS) and reports on (1) the status of LIS research in 2015 and (2) on the evolution of LIS research longitudinally from 1965 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a quantitative intellectual content analysis of articles published in 30+ scholarly LIS journals, following the design by Tuomaala et al. (2014). In the content analysis, we classify articles along eight dimensions covering topical content and methodology. Findings The topical findings indicate that the earlier strong LIS emphasis on L&I services has declined notably, while scientific and professional communication has become the most popular topic. Information storage and retrieval has given up its earlier strong position towards the end of the years analyzed. Individuals are increasingly the units of observation. End-user's and developer's viewpoints have strengthened at the cost of intermediaries' viewpoint. LIS research is methodologically increasingly scattered since survey, scientometric methods, experiment, case studies and qualitative studies have all gained in popularity. Consequently, LIS may have become more versatile in the analysis of its research objects during the years analyzed. Originality/value Among quantitative intellectual content analyses of LIS research, the study is unique in its scope: length of analysis period (50 years), width (8 dimensions covering topical content and methodology) and depth (the annual batch of 30+ scholarly journals).