Search (229 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Borko, H.: Determining user requirements for an information storage and retrieval system : a systems approach (1962) 0.20
    0.19784787 = product of:
      0.39569575 = sum of:
        0.22507617 = weight(_text_:storage in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22507617 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
        0.06936607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936607 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
        0.10125351 = weight(_text_:systems in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10125351 = score(doc=4980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.76829356 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Information systems workshop
  2. Goffman, W.; Newill, V.A.: ¬A methodology for test and evaluation of information retrieval systems (1966/67) 0.20
    0.19738582 = product of:
      0.39477164 = sum of:
        0.22507617 = weight(_text_:storage in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22507617 = score(doc=1310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
        0.098098435 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098098435 = score(doc=1310,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
        0.07159704 = weight(_text_:systems in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07159704 = score(doc=1310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1966/67), S.19-26
  3. Azubuike, A.A.; Umoh, J.S.: Computerized information storage and retrieval systems (1988) 0.18
    0.18301964 = product of:
      0.36603928 = sum of:
        0.22507617 = weight(_text_:storage in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22507617 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.9632287 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
        0.06936607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936607 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
        0.07159704 = weight(_text_:systems in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07159704 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
  4. Fugmann, R.: On the role of subjectivity in establishing, using, operating and evaluating information retrieval systems : treatise 2 on information retrieval theory (1973) 0.18
    0.1823582 = product of:
      0.3647164 = sum of:
        0.19694164 = weight(_text_:storage in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19694164 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.8428251 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.105127364 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105127364 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.06264741 = weight(_text_:systems in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06264741 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.353-372
  5. Buckland, M.; Plaunt, C.: On the construction of selection systems (1994) 0.18
    0.18015626 = product of:
      0.36031252 = sum of:
        0.19894111 = weight(_text_:storage in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19894111 = score(doc=2221,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.85138196 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
        0.06131152 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06131152 = score(doc=2221,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
        0.10005991 = weight(_text_:systems in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10005991 = score(doc=2221,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.75923675 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the structure and components of information storage and retrieval systems and information searching and filtering systems and analyzes the tasks performed in these systems. Argues that all information storage and retrieval systems can be represented by combinations of these components
  6. Gibb, F.; Smart, G.: Expert systems and information storage and retrieval (1991) 0.17
    0.1727126 = product of:
      0.3454252 = sum of:
        0.19694164 = weight(_text_:storage in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19694164 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.8428251 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
        0.08583613 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08583613 = score(doc=4425,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
        0.06264741 = weight(_text_:systems in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06264741 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Online information retrieval today and tomorrow. Ed.: C. Armstrong et al
  7. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.17
    0.16865776 = product of:
      0.33731553 = sum of:
        0.19894111 = weight(_text_:storage in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19894111 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.85138196 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.075090975 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075090975 = score(doc=4931,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.06328344 = weight(_text_:systems in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06328344 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
  8. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Haak, P.H.; Nieuwenhuysen, P.; Scheepsma, G.M.A.; Veeger, L.; Vis, G.C.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : Pt. 2: Classical retrieval systems (1991) 0.15
    0.14803937 = product of:
      0.29607874 = sum of:
        0.16880713 = weight(_text_:storage in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16880713 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.7224215 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.07357383 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07357383 = score(doc=5047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.053697783 = weight(_text_:systems in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053697783 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
  9. Sieverts, E.G.; Zwart, B.D.: ¬A picture of retrieval software for systems with images (1994) 0.14
    0.14135715 = product of:
      0.2827143 = sum of:
        0.17055647 = weight(_text_:storage in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17055647 = score(doc=1960,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.729908 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
        0.06785942 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06785942 = score(doc=1960,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
        0.04429841 = weight(_text_:systems in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04429841 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The many techniques developed for the storage and retrieval of textual information have also become available for the storage and retrieval of graphics and images in various kinds of database systems. Of the many existing software packages for information storage and retrieval, a fast growing number offer the possibility of storing images. As part of a software evaluation project, criteria for the evaluation of image capabiblities of retrieval software packages are listed and these criteria are used to report on the graphical capabilities of the following software packages: Advision, askSam, Cardbox for Windows, FolioViews, IdeaList, Inmagic-Image, KAware, Personal Librarian and ZyImage
  10. Sugano, I.: ¬The study of criteria for evaluating OPACs as information retrieval systems (1996) 0.14
    0.13957286 = product of:
      0.27914572 = sum of:
        0.15915288 = weight(_text_:storage in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15915288 = score(doc=1626,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.68110555 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.06936607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936607 = score(doc=1626,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.050626755 = weight(_text_:systems in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050626755 = score(doc=1626,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Most of the criteria proposed to date for the evaluation of OPACs focus on evaluation of their retrieval function. Argues that the storage function is more important because the quality of information retrieval systems is dependent on the quality of stored information as well as the description and depth of indexing of stored information. States that OPACs should therefore be evaluated from the perspectives of both storage and retrieval functions. Examines 4 studies on criteria for evaluating OPACs and suggests a new evaluation framework based on the work of C.R. Hildreth
  11. Masiero, P.C.: Authoring and searching in dynamically growing hypertext databases (1994) 0.13
    0.12941442 = product of:
      0.25882885 = sum of:
        0.15915288 = weight(_text_:storage in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15915288 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.68110555 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
        0.049049217 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049049217 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
        0.050626755 = weight(_text_:systems in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050626755 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Shows how an application in office information systems can be modelled so that a dynamically growing database of hypertext documents is created and automatically extended, as well as easily searched. Proposes a method for analyzing office applications which relies on a model based on statecharts to record the flow of documents within the system. A prototype implementation is described of a hypertext system to support the creation, storage and retrieval of documents associated with formal face to face meetings. Special features to be incorporated into hypertext systems aimed at supporting the storage and retrieval of office documents are also identified
  12. Hoogeveen, M.J.; Meer, K. van der: Integration of information retrieval and database management in support of multimedia police work (1994) 0.13
    0.12710416 = product of:
      0.25420833 = sum of:
        0.13925877 = weight(_text_:storage in 7149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13925877 = score(doc=7149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.59596735 = fieldWeight in 7149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7149)
        0.06069531 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06069531 = score(doc=7149,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7149, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7149)
        0.054254252 = weight(_text_:systems in 7149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054254252 = score(doc=7149,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 7149, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7149)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Database management systems (DBMSs) are a major component of most information systems (ISs). The relational DBMS is nowadays by the far most widely accepted DBMS, although many large non-relational DBMSs are still in use, and object oriented DBMSs are developing. Besides, more and more DBMSs are supporting basic multimedia storage and retrieval facilieties. Nevertheless, advanced information retrieval facilities, especially for accessing large document and text databases, are still the almost exclusive domain of information storage and retrieval systems (IRSs). A growing need is identified to integrate the facilities of a DBMS and an IRS in order to fully support work with multiple data types, like multimedia police work. For Dutch police departments, a criminal investigation system is developed, fully integrating both types of facilities
  13. Almerri, J.; McGregor, D.R.: Codon signatures : a document retrieval method (1996) 0.12
    0.12456551 = product of:
      0.18684827 = sum of:
        0.08440357 = weight(_text_:storage in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08440357 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.36121076 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.05816522 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05816522 = score(doc=6970,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.026848892 = weight(_text_:systems in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026848892 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.017430587 = product of:
          0.034861173 = sum of:
            0.034861173 = weight(_text_:22 in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034861173 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1501726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04288404 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    The performance of an information retrieval system depends on its ability to distinguish between relevant and non relevant documents in response to users' information needs. Proposes a new method called Codon Signatures (CS) that is able to use a relationship between terms and concepts. The Codon Signature is designed to improve retrieval performance (recall and precision) by creating the Codon structure, a representation of semantic meaning in context. It is also designed to reduce the amount of storage space required by the index. Presents a theoretical analysis of CS paprameters and performance. The method was tested against 3 document base collections and gave acceptable results regarding information effectiveness and efficiency, compared to a conventional Signature Files method
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  14. Devadason, F.J.; Kumbhar, M.R.: Language and indexing language : Nalimor and Gardin revised (1988) 0.12
    0.12336615 = product of:
      0.2467323 = sum of:
        0.14067261 = weight(_text_:storage in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14067261 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.60201794 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
        0.06131152 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06131152 = score(doc=2852,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
        0.04474815 = weight(_text_:systems in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04474815 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.339541 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Studies the salient features of ordinary language as a means of designing languages for information storage and retrieval systems. Pays particular attention to the POPSI (Postulate-based Permuted Subject Indexing) language.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Wilson, P.: Situational relevance (1971) 0.12
    0.12268427 = product of:
      0.3680528 = sum of:
        0.28134522 = weight(_text_:storage in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28134522 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            1.2040359 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
        0.086707585 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086707585 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 9(1971), S.457-471
  16. Frakes, W.B.: Introduction to information storage and retrieval systems (1992) 0.12
    0.12081762 = product of:
      0.24163523 = sum of:
        0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 3496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112538084 = score(doc=3496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 3496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3496)
        0.049049217 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049049217 = score(doc=3496,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3496, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3496)
        0.08004793 = weight(_text_:systems in 3496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08004793 = score(doc=3496,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.6073894 = fieldWeight in 3496, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3496)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter introduces and defines basic IR concepts, and presents a domain model of IR systems that describes their similarities and differences. The domain model is used to introduce and relate the chapters that follow. The relationship of IR systems to other information systems is discussed, as is the evaluation of IR systems
    Source
    Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates
  17. Sieverts, E.G.; Lobbestael, G.; Groeniger, B.O.; Provost, F.; Sikovà, ?: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.5: personal information managers, hypertext and relevance ranking programs (1992) 0.12
    0.11809294 = product of:
      0.23618588 = sum of:
        0.14619127 = weight(_text_:storage in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14619127 = score(doc=5049,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.62563545 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.05202455 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05202455 = score(doc=5049,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.037970066 = weight(_text_:systems in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037970066 = score(doc=5049,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the fifth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of seven programs are presented and various properties and qualitites of theses programs are discussed. In this instalment of the series we discuss programs for information storage and retrieval which are primarily characterised by the properties of personal information managers (PIMs), hypertext programs, or best match and ranking retrieval systems. The programs reviewed in this issue are the personal information managers 3by5/RediReference, askSam, Dayflo Tracker, and Ize; Personal Librarian uses best match and ranking; the hypertext programs are Folio Views and the HyperKRS/HyperCard combination (aksSam, Ize and Personal Librarian boast hypertext features as well). HyperKRS/HyperCard is only available for the Apple Macintosh. All other programs run under MS-DOS; versions of Personal Librarian also run under Windows and some other systems. For each of the seven programs about 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually
  18. Tereshchenko, S.S.: Struktury dannykh v avtomatizirrovannykh informatsionnykh sistemakh (1997) 0.12
    0.11745461 = product of:
      0.23490922 = sum of:
        0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112538084 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
        0.034683034 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034683034 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
        0.0876881 = weight(_text_:systems in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0876881 = score(doc=1648,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.6653617 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the structure of data stored in automated systems, from both the formal and semantic viewpoint. The following systems are considered: automated control systems, automated information retrieval systems and automated systems for the storage of scientific and technical information
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Structure of data stored in automated information systems
  19. May, G.: Pictorial history online : a new way to research our past (1989) 0.12
    0.11626545 = product of:
      0.2325309 = sum of:
        0.112538084 = weight(_text_:storage in 3513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112538084 = score(doc=3513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 3513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3513)
        0.06936607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936607 = score(doc=3513,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3513, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3513)
        0.050626755 = weight(_text_:systems in 3513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050626755 = score(doc=3513,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 3513, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3513)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the storage of images (Australian historical photographs) and associated descriptive text, and the simultaneous on-line retrieval of both the images and the text. Describes the process of image retrieval from videodisc linked to data bases focusing on the Bicentennial Archives Project at the New South Wales Government Printing Office. The following aspects are examined: history of the project; systems now operating; hardware; videodisc production; and data base creation and information retrieval. Discusses applications of this system in other Australian institutions and outlines some major advantages of videodisc-based image retrieval systems.
  20. Kemp, D.A.: Relevance, pertinence and information system development (1974) 0.11
    0.114387274 = product of:
      0.22877455 = sum of:
        0.14067261 = weight(_text_:storage in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14067261 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23366846 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.60201794 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
        0.043353792 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043353792 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12972058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
        0.04474815 = weight(_text_:systems in 8918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04474815 = score(doc=8918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179013 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04288404 = queryNorm
            0.339541 = fieldWeight in 8918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8918)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The difference between pertinence and relevance is discussed. Other pairs of terms and the differences between their members are examined, and the suggestion is made that such studies could increase our understanding of the theory of information systems, and thence lead to practical improvements.
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 10(1974), S.37-47

Authors

Languages

Types