Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Salton, G."
  1. Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969) 0.05
    0.054619618 = product of:
      0.14565231 = sum of:
        0.07865016 = weight(_text_:storage in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07865016 = score(doc=4151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1866346 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034252144 = queryNorm
            0.42141256 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
        0.041983422 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041983422 = score(doc=4151,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10360982 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034252144 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
        0.025018727 = weight(_text_:systems in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025018727 = score(doc=4151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10526281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034252144 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Two widerly used criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems are, respectively, the recall and the precision. Since the determiniation of these measures is dependent on a distinction between documents which are relevant to a given query and documents which are not relevant to that query, it has sometimes been claimed that an accurate, generally valid evaluation cannot be based on recall and precision measure. A study was made to determine the effect of variations in relevance assesments do not produce significant variations in average recall and precision. It thus appears that properly computed recall and precision data may represent effectiveness indicators which are gemerally valid for many distinct user classes.
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 4(1969), S.343-359
  2. Salton, G.: Thoughts about modern retrieval technologies (1988) 0.03
    0.025722325 = product of:
      0.1028893 = sum of:
        0.07865016 = weight(_text_:storage in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07865016 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1866346 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034252144 = queryNorm
            0.42141256 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
        0.024239138 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024239138 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10360982 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034252144 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the National Federation of Astracting and Information Services, Philadelphia, 28 Feb-2 Mar 88. In recent years, the amount and the variety of available machine-readable data, new technologies have been introduced, such as high density storage devices, and fancy graphic displays useful for information transformation and access. New approaches have also been considered for processing the stored data based on the construction of knowledge bases representing the contents and structure of the information, and the use of expert system techniques to control the user-system interactions. Provides a brief evaluation of the new information processing technologies, and of the software methods proposed for information manipulation.