-
Midorikawa, N.: ¬A discussion of the concepts of facets from the viewpoint of the structures of classification systems (1997)
0.02
0.02161014 = product of:
0.04322028 = sum of:
0.04322028 = product of:
0.08644056 = sum of:
0.08644056 = weight(_text_:systems in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08644056 = score(doc=1806,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.5390046 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 2 concepts of facets have been used in studies of classification systems: one for systems which take hierarchical structure and the other for systems which take multidimensional structure. Both correspond to 'principles of division'. The concepts of facets in multidimensional structure systems is used for addressing a subject from many aspects so should equate to the broadest principle of division in order to grasp a multiplicity of aspects. The concept of facets used in hierarchical systems addresses only the significance of a coherent set of items. This concept is not distinguished from the principle of division and there is no purpose in introducing a concept of facets into hierarchical systems in addition to the principle of division
-
Mirorikawa, N.: Structures of classification systems : hierarchical and multidimensional (1996)
0.02
0.019058352 = product of:
0.038116705 = sum of:
0.038116705 = product of:
0.07623341 = sum of:
0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07623341 = score(doc=6583,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers classification systems from a structural point of view. Distinguishes between 2 kinds of methods of categorization of classification systems: the first categorized by structure, either hierarchical or multidimensional; and the second by style of expression, either enumerative or sythetic. Identifies 4 leading classification systems according to their structures: DDC, LCC, UDC and Colon Classification. Focuses on DDC referring to 2 interpretatives of its structure, one of which is hierarchical and the other is partially multidimensional. Also relates this to the matter of interpretation of the notation '0', interpreted in one instance as 'generalities', and in another as 'coordination sign'
-
Suzuki, Y.: Partial information and its information structure (1995)
0.02
0.015401474 = product of:
0.030802948 = sum of:
0.030802948 = product of:
0.061605897 = sum of:
0.061605897 = weight(_text_:systems in 6584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061605897 = score(doc=6584,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 6584, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Almost all information systems have their own logic. Differentiates between classical and non classical logic, the main example of which is intuitionistic logic which was created to treat partial information. Explains this, discusses the information structure based on intuitionalistic logic, and introduces an intuitionistic information retrieval system. This work represents an introduction to the development of the general theory of partial information and the theory of information retrieval systems which can treat partial information
-
Sugano, I.: ¬The study of criteria for evaluating OPACs as information retrieval systems (1996)
0.02
0.015401474 = product of:
0.030802948 = sum of:
0.030802948 = product of:
0.061605897 = sum of:
0.061605897 = weight(_text_:systems in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061605897 = score(doc=1626,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Most of the criteria proposed to date for the evaluation of OPACs focus on evaluation of their retrieval function. Argues that the storage function is more important because the quality of information retrieval systems is dependent on the quality of stored information as well as the description and depth of indexing of stored information. States that OPACs should therefore be evaluated from the perspectives of both storage and retrieval functions. Examines 4 studies on criteria for evaluating OPACs and suggests a new evaluation framework based on the work of C.R. Hildreth
-
Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994)
0.01
0.014140441 = product of:
0.028280882 = sum of:
0.028280882 = product of:
0.056561764 = sum of:
0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056561764 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
-
Takano, M.: OPACs in university libraries (1994)
0.01
0.013613109 = product of:
0.027226217 = sum of:
0.027226217 = product of:
0.054452434 = sum of:
0.054452434 = weight(_text_:systems in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054452434 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 1991 60,4% of Japanese university libraries had introduced computerized systems and 57,5% of these had computerized catalogues. In this context, discusses the following: subject searching in computerized catalogues; standardisation of OPACs, particularly as these are now available to a wide range of external users; and access to journal articles, especially in view of increasing journal purchase relative to books
-
Kim, P.K.: ¬An automatic indexing of compound words based on mutual information for Korean text retrieval (1995)
0.01
0.010890487 = product of:
0.021780973 = sum of:
0.021780973 = product of:
0.043561947 = sum of:
0.043561947 = weight(_text_:systems in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043561947 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents an automatic indexing technique for compound words suitable for an agglutinative language, specifically Korean. Discusses some construction conditions for compound words and the rules for decomposing compound words to enhance the exhaustivity of indexing, demonstrating that this system, mutual information, enhances both the exhaustivity of indexing and the specifity of terms. Suggests that the construction conditions and rules for decomposition presented may be used in multilingual information retrieval systems to translate the indexing terms of the specific language into those of the language required
