Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Thesaurus"
  1. Shiri, A.: Powering search : the role of thesauri in new information environments (2012) 0.02
    0.0182639 = product of:
      0.0365278 = sum of:
        0.0365278 = product of:
          0.0730556 = sum of:
            0.0730556 = weight(_text_:systems in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0730556 = score(doc=1322,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Powering search offers a clear and comprehensive treatment of the role of thesauri in search user interfaces across a range of information search and retrieval systems - from bibliographic and full-text databases to digital libraries, portals, open archives, and content management systems.
    Content
    Thesauri : introduction and recent developments -- Thesauri in interactive information retrieval -- User-centered approach to the evaluation of thesauri : query formulation and expansion -- Thesauri in web-based search systems -- Thesaurus-based search and browsing functionalities in new thesaurus construction standards -- Design of search user interfaces for thesauri -- Design of user interfaces for multilingual and meta-thesauri -- User-centered evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Guidelines for the design of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Current trends and developments.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems
  2. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.01
    0.010605331 = product of:
      0.021210661 = sum of:
        0.021210661 = product of:
          0.042421322 = sum of:
            0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042421322 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  3. ¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004) 0.01
    0.0057755527 = product of:
      0.011551105 = sum of:
        0.011551105 = product of:
          0.02310221 = sum of:
            0.02310221 = weight(_text_:systems in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02310221 = score(doc=3243,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.14405504 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."