Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.07
    0.07385479 = product of:
      0.14770958 = sum of:
        0.14770958 = sum of:
          0.07700737 = weight(_text_:systems in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07700737 = score(doc=7750,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
          0.0707022 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0707022 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  2. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.06
    0.05908383 = product of:
      0.11816766 = sum of:
        0.11816766 = sum of:
          0.061605897 = weight(_text_:systems in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061605897 = score(doc=2923,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
          0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056561764 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Analysis and design of electronic document management systems in large enterprises
  3. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.05
    0.051698353 = product of:
      0.10339671 = sum of:
        0.10339671 = sum of:
          0.053905163 = weight(_text_:systems in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053905163 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049491543 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  4. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.05
    0.050061855 = product of:
      0.10012371 = sum of:
        0.10012371 = sum of:
          0.043561947 = weight(_text_:systems in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043561947 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
          0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056561764 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic document management systems are a collection of 3 complementary technologies: the repository, the workflow engine and the searching-and-indexing technology. The document repository stores, controls and manages documents. Workflow can eliminate the dead time a document spends in transition between works and integrates with the repository and electronic mail system. Search and indexing technology enables more efficient searching than standard full text technologies by configuring searches to specific attributes. Discusses how the technologies can be combined to manage a WWW site and offers advice on choosing an appropriate solution
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
  5. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.04
    0.043804124 = product of:
      0.08760825 = sum of:
        0.08760825 = sum of:
          0.038116705 = weight(_text_:systems in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038116705 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049491543 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  6. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04
    0.041441064 = product of:
      0.08288213 = sum of:
        0.08288213 = product of:
          0.24864638 = sum of:
            0.24864638 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24864638 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4424171 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  7. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.04
    0.036927395 = product of:
      0.07385479 = sum of:
        0.07385479 = sum of:
          0.038503684 = weight(_text_:systems in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038503684 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.0353511 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0353511 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Peters, G.; Gaese, V.: ¬Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von G+J (2003) 0.03
    0.025030928 = product of:
      0.050061855 = sum of:
        0.050061855 = sum of:
          0.021780973 = weight(_text_:systems in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021780973 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.028280882 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028280882 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Wir werden einmal die Grundlagen des Text-Mining-Systems bei IBM darstellen, dann werden wir das Projekt etwas umfangreicher und deutlicher darstellen, da kennen wir uns aus. Von daher haben wir zwei Teile, einmal Heidelberg, einmal Hamburg. Noch einmal zur Technologie. Text-Mining ist eine von IBM entwickelte Technologie, die in einer besonderen Ausformung und Programmierung für uns zusammengestellt wurde. Das Projekt hieß bei uns lange Zeit DocText Miner und heißt seit einiger Zeit auf Vorschlag von IBM DocCat, das soll eine Abkürzung für Document-Categoriser sein, sie ist ja auch nett und anschaulich. Wir fangen an mit Text-Mining, das bei IBM in Heidelberg entwickelt wurde. Die verstehen darunter das automatische Indexieren als eine Instanz, also einen Teil von Text-Mining. Probleme werden dabei gezeigt, und das Text-Mining ist eben eine Methode zur Strukturierung von und der Suche in großen Dokumentenmengen, die Extraktion von Informationen und, das ist der hohe Anspruch, von impliziten Zusammenhängen. Das letztere sei dahingestellt. IBM macht das quantitativ, empirisch, approximativ und schnell. das muss man wirklich sagen. Das Ziel, und das ist ganz wichtig für unser Projekt gewesen, ist nicht, den Text zu verstehen, sondern das Ergebnis dieser Verfahren ist, was sie auf Neudeutsch a bundle of words, a bag of words nennen, also eine Menge von bedeutungstragenden Begriffen aus einem Text zu extrahieren, aufgrund von Algorithmen, also im Wesentlichen aufgrund von Rechenoperationen. Es gibt eine ganze Menge von linguistischen Vorstudien, ein wenig Linguistik ist auch dabei, aber nicht die Grundlage der ganzen Geschichte. Was sie für uns gemacht haben, ist also die Annotierung von Pressetexten für unsere Pressedatenbank. Für diejenigen, die es noch nicht kennen: Gruner + Jahr führt eine Textdokumentation, die eine Datenbank führt, seit Anfang der 70er Jahre, da sind z.Z. etwa 6,5 Millionen Dokumente darin, davon etwas über 1 Million Volltexte ab 1993. Das Prinzip war lange Zeit, dass wir die Dokumente, die in der Datenbank gespeichert waren und sind, verschlagworten und dieses Prinzip haben wir auch dann, als der Volltext eingeführt wurde, in abgespeckter Form weitergeführt. Zu diesen 6,5 Millionen Dokumenten gehören dann eben auch ungefähr 10 Millionen Faksimileseiten, weil wir die Faksimiles auch noch standardmäßig aufheben.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:36
  9. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.02
    0.024745772 = product of:
      0.049491543 = sum of:
        0.049491543 = product of:
          0.09898309 = sum of:
            0.09898309 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09898309 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  10. Functional requirements for evidence in recordkeeping (1997) 0.02
    0.023578597 = product of:
      0.047157194 = sum of:
        0.047157194 = product of:
          0.09431439 = sum of:
            0.09431439 = weight(_text_:systems in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09431439 = score(doc=190,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.5881023 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A statement of requirements needed to ensure the preservation of evidence in electronic form and not the application requirements for archival or records management systems. Although specifically related to electronic recordkeeping systems, the requirements are also applicable to manual or hybrid systems
  11. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.02
    0.021307886 = product of:
      0.04261577 = sum of:
        0.04261577 = product of:
          0.08523154 = sum of:
            0.08523154 = weight(_text_:systems in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08523154 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.5314657 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  12. Vijlenbroek, J.J.M.: Potential workflow applications : information management impact (1995) 0.02
    0.019251842 = product of:
      0.038503684 = sum of:
        0.038503684 = product of:
          0.07700737 = sum of:
            0.07700737 = weight(_text_:systems in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07700737 = score(doc=3401,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Defines and describes workflow management, examines workflow management from an organizational and a technological perspective, and discusses its relationship with documentary information systems. Considers the consequences of the introduction of workflow management and documentary information systems on the documentary information function within organization
  13. Allen, D.P.: Evaluating hybrid systems (1997) 0.02
    0.019251842 = product of:
      0.038503684 = sum of:
        0.038503684 = product of:
          0.07700737 = sum of:
            0.07700737 = weight(_text_:systems in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07700737 = score(doc=797,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    3rd generation automated workflow packages have been designed to facilitate a collaborative effort between management information systems and end users. Describes automated workflow software and the criteria that should be used in evaluating competing packages: design, simulation, modeling, monitoring and management, and document management capabilities (capture, indexing, retrieval and image manipulation)
  14. Williams, B.J.S.: Document management in local government : the latest update: 'in 1998 authorities are chasing effiency as hard as any other sector' (1998) 0.02
    0.019251842 = product of:
      0.038503684 = sum of:
        0.038503684 = product of:
          0.07700737 = sum of:
            0.07700737 = weight(_text_:systems in 3337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07700737 = score(doc=3337,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 3337, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys document management systems is use in UK local government. covers: finance, revenues, benefits systems, palnning and other services including libraries, emergency planning, social services, electronic printing, purchasing, recruitment and contract services
  15. Thiel, T.J.: Automated indexing of information stored on optical disk electronic document image management systems (1994) 0.02
    0.019058352 = product of:
      0.038116705 = sum of:
        0.038116705 = product of:
          0.07623341 = sum of:
            0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07623341 = score(doc=1260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Cox, R.J.: Electronic systems and records management in the information age : an introduction (1997) 0.02
    0.019058352 = product of:
      0.038116705 = sum of:
        0.038116705 = product of:
          0.07623341 = sum of:
            0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07623341 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Geisen, R.: Cognitive automation with ParsyForm : the breakthrough for workflow systems (1997) 0.02
    0.018862877 = product of:
      0.037725754 = sum of:
        0.037725754 = product of:
          0.07545151 = sum of:
            0.07545151 = weight(_text_:systems in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07545151 = score(doc=807,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.4704818 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Parsytec Computer GmbH, Germany, has developed PrasyForm to help integrate document management systems and wirkflow systems by automating data capture into the document management system through the application of cognitive automation, i.e. the automation of simple, repetitive tasks where human recognition is unnecessary. It combines greyscale image processing, self-training intelligent character recognition readers (OCR) and associative database matching techniques
  18. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.02
    0.01767555 = product of:
      0.0353511 = sum of:
        0.0353511 = product of:
          0.0707022 = sum of:
            0.0707022 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0707022 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  19. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.02
    0.017497903 = product of:
      0.034995805 = sum of:
        0.034995805 = product of:
          0.06999161 = sum of:
            0.06999161 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06999161 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
  20. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.02
    0.017497903 = product of:
      0.034995805 = sum of:
        0.034995805 = product of:
          0.06999161 = sum of:
            0.06999161 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06999161 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 8
  • f 2
  • sp 2
  • More… Less…