Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalsprachen"
  1. Gliszczynski, S. von; Kaiser, D.: GRIPS-Funktionen : GRIPS-MainMenu: Benutzerführung von Anfang an (1994) 0.02
    0.021210661 = product of:
      0.042421322 = sum of:
        0.042421322 = product of:
          0.084842645 = sum of:
            0.084842645 = weight(_text_:22 in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084842645 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:23:22
  2. Jascó, P.: WebSPIRS 4.0 : Javascript search software (1998) 0.02
    0.021210661 = product of:
      0.042421322 = sum of:
        0.042421322 = product of:
          0.084842645 = sum of:
            0.084842645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084842645 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  3. Barker, A.L.: Non-Boolean searching on commercial online systems : optimising use of Dialog TARGET and ESA/IRS QUESTQUORUM (1995) 0.02
    0.016505018 = product of:
      0.033010036 = sum of:
        0.033010036 = product of:
          0.06602007 = sum of:
            0.06602007 = weight(_text_:systems in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06602007 = score(doc=3853,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers 2 non-Boolean searching systems available on commercial online systems. QUESTQUORUM, based on coordination level searching, was introduced by ESA/IRS in Dec. 85. TARGET, which employs partial match probabilistic retrieval was introduced by DIALOG in Dec 93. 6 subject searches were carried out on databases available on both Dialog and ESA/IRS to compare TARGET and QUESTQUORUM with Boolean searching. Outlines the main advantages of these tools, and their disadvantages. Suggests when their use may be preferable
  4. Buxton, A.B.: Common command languages (1991) 0.02
    0.016505018 = product of:
      0.033010036 = sum of:
        0.033010036 = product of:
          0.06602007 = sum of:
            0.06602007 = weight(_text_:systems in 7740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06602007 = score(doc=7740,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 7740, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the need for a common command language (CCL) for searching online database systems. Describes a number of CCLs: Euronet-DIANE Common Command Language, the ISO standard for interactive search systems, the NISO Common Command Language. Describes the implementation of CCLs on a number of systems: the gateway service EasyNet, the DoD Gateway Information System operated by the US Defense Technical Information Center, and an information service for Greek public access databases operated by the Greek National Documentation Centre. Examines the prospects for increased use of CCLs
  5. Barker, A.L.: DataStar Web : a comparison with 'classic' DataStar command language searching (1998) 0.01
    0.014140441 = product of:
      0.028280882 = sum of:
        0.028280882 = product of:
          0.056561764 = sum of:
            0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056561764 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.155-167
  6. Z39.58-1992: Common command language for online interactive information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.013613109 = product of:
      0.027226217 = sum of:
        0.027226217 = product of:
          0.054452434 = sum of:
            0.054452434 = weight(_text_:systems in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054452434 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Useful to system designers that want to specify a uniform command terminology, Z39.58-1992 describes nineteen non-proprietary command terms for use in online information retrieval systems. Defines the vocabulary, syntax, and operational meaning of the commands
  7. Marchionini, G.; Meadow, C.T.; Dwiggins, S.; Lin, X.; Jiabin, W.; Yuan, W.: ¬A study of user interaction with information retrieval interfaces : progress report (1991) 0.01
    0.009529176 = product of:
      0.019058352 = sum of:
        0.019058352 = product of:
          0.038116705 = sum of:
            0.038116705 = weight(_text_:systems in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038116705 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports progress and future plans for a project to study the interactions of users with information retrieval interfaces. Tests are run with professional data base searchers and with end users who are members of a profession but have little or no searching experience. Interfaces tested include a command language search system used to search DIALOG bibliographic data bases, a non-procedural system that produces DIALOG commands, and several full text systems, including one using hypertext. The intent is to determine which kinds of users perform best with each type of interface. The project is being conducted jointly bay the University of Toronto and the University of Maryland