Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.05
    0.04877709 = product of:
      0.09755418 = sum of:
        0.09755418 = sum of:
          0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040948182 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05660599 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
    Imprint
    Gaithersburg, MD : National Institute of Standards / Information Technology Laboratory
  2. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.03
    0.030485678 = product of:
      0.060971357 = sum of:
        0.060971357 = sum of:
          0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025592614 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the role of user-centred evaluations as an essential method for researching interactive information retrieval. It draws mainly on the work carried out during the Clarity Project where different user-centred evaluations were run during the lifecycle of a cross-language information retrieval system. The iterative testing was not only instrumental to the development of a usable system, but it enhanced our knowledge of the potential, impact, and actual use of cross-language information retrieval technology. Indeed the role of the user evaluation was dual: by testing a specific prototype it was possible to gain a micro-view and assess the effectiveness of each component of the complex system; by cumulating the result of all the evaluations (in total 43 people were involved) it was possible to build a macro-view of how cross-language retrieval would impact on users and their tasks. By showing the richness of results that can be acquired, this paper aims at stimulating researchers into considering user-centred evaluations as a flexible, adaptable and comprehensive technique for investigating non-traditional information access systems.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  3. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.02476512 = product of:
      0.04953024 = sum of:
        0.04953024 = product of:
          0.09906048 = sum of:
            0.09906048 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09906048 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  4. Larsen, B.; Ingwersen, P.; Lund, B.: Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation (2009) 0.02
    0.024388544 = product of:
      0.04877709 = sum of:
        0.04877709 = sum of:
          0.020474091 = weight(_text_:technology in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020474091 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
          0.028302995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028302995 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:48:28
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.646-654
  5. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.014151498 = product of:
      0.028302995 = sum of:
        0.028302995 = product of:
          0.05660599 = sum of:
            0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05660599 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  6. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01
    0.010613623 = product of:
      0.021227246 = sum of:
        0.021227246 = product of:
          0.042454492 = sum of:
            0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042454492 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  7. Bar-Ilan, J.: Methods for measuring search engine performance over time (2002) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.4, S.308-319
  8. Voorhees, E.M.: Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) (2009) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This entry summarizes the history, results, and impact of the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), a workshop series designed to support the information retrieval community by building the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluation of retrieval technology.
  9. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.K.: ¬The Text REtrieval Conference (2005) 0.01
    0.010014695 = product of:
      0.02002939 = sum of:
        0.02002939 = product of:
          0.04005878 = sum of:
            0.04005878 = weight(_text_:technology in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04005878 = score(doc=5082,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.25753677 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Text retrieval technology targets a problem that is all too familiar: finding relevant information in large stores of electronic documents. The problem is an old one, with the first research conference devoted to the subject held in 1958 [11]. Since then the problem has continued to grow as more information is created in electronic form and more people gain electronic access. The advent of the World Wide Web, where anyone can publish so everyone must search, is a graphic illustration of the need for effective retrieval technology. The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a workshop series designed to build the infrastructure necessary for the large-scale evaluation of text retrieval technology, thereby accelerating its transfer into the commercial sector. The series is sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the U.S. Department of Defense. At the time of this writing, there have been twelve TREC workshops and preparations for the thirteenth workshop are under way. Participants in the workshops have been drawn from the academic, commercial, and government sectors, and have included representatives from more than twenty different countries. These collective efforts have accomplished a great deal: a variety of large test collections have been built for both traditional ad hoc retrieval and related tasks such as cross-language retrieval, speech retrieval, and question answering; retrieval effectiveness has approximately doubled; and many commercial retrieval systems now contain technology first developed in TREC.
  10. Pirkola, A.; Järvelin, K.: Employing the resolution power of search keys (2001) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.7, S.575-583
  11. Morse, E.; Lewis, M.; Olsen, K.A.: Testing visual information retrieval methodologies case study : comparative analysis of textual, icon, graphical, and "spring" displays (2002) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.1, S.28-40
  12. Kilgour, F.: ¬An experiment using coordinate title word searches (2004) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.1, S.74-80
  13. Della Mea, V.; Mizzaro, S.: Measuring retrieval effectiveness : a new proposal and a first experimental validation (2004) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.530-543
  14. Huang, M.-h.; Wang, H.-y.: ¬The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged an users' judgments of relevance (2004) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.970-979
  15. King, D.W.: Blazing new trails : in celebration of an audacious career (2000) 0.01
    0.008844686 = product of:
      0.017689371 = sum of:
        0.017689371 = product of:
          0.035378743 = sum of:
            0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035378743 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  16. Newby, G.B.: Cognitive space and information space (2001) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 6977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=6977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 6977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1026-1048
  17. Zhang, X.: Collaborative relevance judgment : a group consensus method for evaluating user search performance (2002) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.220-231
  18. Alemayehu, N.: Analysis of performance variation using quey expansion (2003) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 1454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=1454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1454)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.379-391
  19. Vakkari, P.; Sormunen, E.: ¬The influence of relevance levels an the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.963-969
  20. Ding, C.H.Q.: ¬A probabilistic model for Latent Semantic Indexing (2005) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=3459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.6, S.597-608

Languages

  • e 34
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 34
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…