Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

0.027993329 = product of:
  0.055986658 = sum of:
    0.04001737 = weight(_text_:technology in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04001737 = score(doc=998,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.01596929 = product of:
      0.03193858 = sum of:
        0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03193858 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.

Date

22. 6.2023 18:15:06

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827

0.023443995 = product of:
  0.04688799 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
    0.019163147 = product of:
      0.038326293 = sum of:
        0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038326293 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1111-1123

0.019536663 = product of:
  0.039073326 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
    0.01596929 = product of:
      0.03193858 = sum of:
        0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03193858 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

9. 2.2008 17:22:42

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.435-449

0.010356457 = product of:
  0.041425828 = sum of:
    0.041425828 = product of:
      0.082851656 = sum of:
        0.082851656 = weight(_text_:management in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082851656 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.129-144

0.010356457 = product of:
  0.041425828 = sum of:
    0.041425828 = product of:
      0.082851656 = sum of:
        0.082851656 = weight(_text_:management in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082851656 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.6, S.869-

0.0092416145 = product of:
  0.036966458 = sum of:
    0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036966458 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352

0.008168511 = product of:
  0.032674044 = sum of:
    0.032674044 = weight(_text_:technology in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032674044 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Erratum in: Järvelin, K., O. Persson: The DCI-index: discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Erratum re. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1433-1440

0.008086413 = product of:
  0.032345653 = sum of:
    0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032345653 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.7, S.575-583

0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.10, S.939-951

0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=4922,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4922, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4922)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.2, S.222-232

0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.971-986

0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.476-488

0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1424-1439

0.0062769614 = product of:
  0.025107846 = sum of:
    0.025107846 = product of:
      0.05021569 = sum of:
        0.05021569 = weight(_text_:management in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05021569 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In order to design information retrieval (IR) learning environments and instruction, it is important to explore learning outcomes of different pedagogical solutions. Learning outcomes have seldom been evaluated in IR instruction. The particular focus of this study is the assessment of learning outcomes in an experimental, but naturalistic, learning environment compared to more traditional instruction. The 57 participants of an introductory course on IR were selected for this study, and the analysis illustrates their learning outcomes regarding both conceptual change and development of IR skill. Concept mapping of student essays was used to analyze conceptual change and log-files of search exercises provided data for performance assessment. Students in the experimental learning environment changed their conceptions more regarding linguistic aspects of IR and paid more emphasis on planning and management of search process. Performance assessment indicates that anchored instruction and scaffolding with an instructional tool, the IR Game, with performance feedback enables students to construct queries with fewer semantic knowledge errors also in operational IR systems.

Source

Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.4, S.949-972

0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1120-xxxx

0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.322-334

0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 4965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=4965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4965)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.86-97

0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1446-1462

0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 2771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=2771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2771)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.620-648

0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.12, S.1706-1722