Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Sugimoto, C.R."
  1. Sugimoto, C.R.; Pratt , J.A.; Hauser, K.: Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared impact of LIS/MIS fields (2008) 0.03 
    0.02848139 = product of:
  0.05696278 = sum of:
    0.03920885 = weight(_text_:technology in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03920885 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
    0.017753927 = product of:
      0.035507854 = sum of:
        0.035507854 = weight(_text_:management in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035507854 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This study utilized bibliometric tools to analyze the relationship between two separate, but related, fields: Library and Information Science (LIS) and Management Information Systems (MIS). The top-ranked 48 journals in each field were used as the unit of analysis. Using these journals, field cocitation was introduced as a method for evaluating the relationships between the two fields. The three-phased study evaluated (a) the knowledge imported/exported between LIS and MIS, (b) the body of knowledge influenced by both fields, and (c) the overlap in fields as demonstrated by multidimensional scaling. Data collection and analysis were performed using DIALOG and SPSS programs. The primary findings from this study indicate that (a) the MIS impact on LIS is greater than the reverse, (b) there is a growing trend for shared impact between the two disciplines, and (c) the area of overlap between the two fields is predominately those journals focusing on technology systems and digital information. Additionally, this study validated field cocitation as a method by which to evaluate relationships between fields.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1441-1453
  2. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012) 0.02 
    0.018949486 = product of:
  0.037898973 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
    0.014794939 = product of:
      0.029589878 = sum of:
        0.029589878 = weight(_text_:management in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029589878 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.997-1016
  3. Ni, C.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Jiang, J.: Venue-author-coupling : a measure for identifying disciplines through author communities (2013) 0.02 
    0.018949486 = product of:
  0.037898973 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
    0.014794939 = product of:
      0.029589878 = sum of:
        0.029589878 = weight(_text_:management in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029589878 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Conceptualizations of disciplinarity often focus on the social aspects of disciplines; that is, disciplines are defined by the set of individuals who participate in their activities and communications. However, operationalizations of disciplinarity often demarcate the boundaries of disciplines by standard classification schemes, which may be inflexible to changes in the participation profile of that discipline. To address this limitation, a metric called venue-author-coupling (VAC) is proposed and illustrated using journals from the Journal Citation Report's (JCR) library science and information science category. As JCRs are some of the most frequently used categories in bibliometric analyses, this allows for an examination of the extent to which the journals in JCR categories can be considered as proxies for disciplines. By extending the idea of bibliographic coupling, VAC identifies similarities among journals based on the similarities of their author profiles. The employment of this method using information science and library science journals provides evidence of four distinct subfields, that is, management information systems, specialized information and library science, library science-focused, and information science-focused research. The proposed VAC method provides a novel way to examine disciplinarity from the perspective of author communities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.265-279
  4. Sugimoto, C.R.; Mostafa, J.: ¬A note of concern and context : on careful use of terminologies (2018) 0.01 
    0.013862422 = product of:
  0.055449687 = sum of:
    0.055449687 = weight(_text_:technology in 7278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055449687 = score(doc=7278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 7278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7278)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.3, S.347-348
  5. Sugimoto, C.R.; Thelwall, M.: Scholars on soap boxes : science communication and dissemination in TED videos (2013) 0.01 
    0.011552017 = product of:
  0.04620807 = sum of:
    0.04620807 = weight(_text_:technology in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04620807 = score(doc=678,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Online videos provide a novel, and often interactive, platform for the popularization of science. One successful collection is hosted on the TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) website. This study uses a range of bibliometric (citation) and webometric (usage and bookmarking) indicators to examine TED videos in order to provide insights into the type and scope of their impact. The results suggest that TED Talks impact primarily the public sphere, with about three-quarters of a billion total views, rather than the academic realm. Differences were found among broad disciplinary areas, with art and design videos having generally lower levels of impact but science and technology videos generating otherwise average impact for TED. Many of the metrics were only loosely related, but there was a general consensus about the most popular videos as measured through views or comments on YouTube and the TED site. Moreover, most videos were found in at least one online syllabus and videos in online syllabi tended to be more viewed, discussed, and blogged. Less-liked videos generated more discussion, although this may be because they are more controversial. Science and technology videos presented by academics were more liked than those by nonacademics, showing that academics are not disadvantaged in this new media environment.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.663-674
  6. Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: Biobibliometric profiling : an examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship (2012) 0.01 
    0.008086413 = product of:
  0.032345653 = sum of:
    0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 4991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032345653 = score(doc=4991,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 4991, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4991)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.450-468
  7. Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies : a tale of two citation databases - Scopus and Web of Science (2009) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2499-2508
  8. Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=4349,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.3, S.467-477
  9. Yan, E.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Institutional interactions : exploring social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks (2011) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1498-1514
  10. Sugimoto, C.R.; Ni, C.; Russell, T.G.; Bychowski, B.: Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity : an examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science (2011) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.9, S.1808-1828
  11. Lee, C.J.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Zhang, G.; Cronin, B.: Bias in peer review (2013) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.2-17
  12. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Bergeron, P.: In their own image? : a comparison of doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior (2013) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.1045-1054
  13. Gazni, A.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Didegah, F.: Mapping world scientific collaboration : authors, institutions, and countries (2012) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.323-335
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Tsou, A.: Team size matters : collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2015) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1323-1332
  15. Haustein, S.; Bowman, T.D.; Holmberg, K.; Tsou, A.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Larivière, V.: Tweets as impact indicators : Examining the implications of automated "bot" accounts on Twitter (2016) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.232-238
  16. Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017) 0.01 
    0.006931211 = product of:
  0.027724843 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2037-2062
  17. Sugimoto, C.R.; Li, D.; Russell, T.G.; Finlay, S.C.; Ding, Y.: ¬The shifting sands of disciplinary development : analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation (2011) 0.01 
    0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.185-204
  18. Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011) 0.01 
    0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1933-1953
  19. Kelly, D.; Sugimoto, C.R.: ¬A systematic review of interactive information retrieval evaluation studies, 1967-2006 (2013) 0.01 
    0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.745-770
  20. Haustein, S.; Peters, I.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Thelwall, M.; Larivière, V.: Tweeting biomedicine : an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature (2014) 0.01 
    0.0057760086 = product of:
  0.023104034 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=1229,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.656-669

Authors

Years

Themes