-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.06251732 = product of:
0.12503465 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.03
0.032821476 = product of:
0.06564295 = sum of:
0.04001737 = weight(_text_:technology in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04001737 = score(doc=1013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.025625587 = product of:
0.051251173 = sum of:
0.051251173 = weight(_text_:management in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051251173 = score(doc=1013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.313-330
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.03
0.027412813 = product of:
0.054825626 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.027100785 = product of:
0.05420157 = sum of:
0.05420157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05420157 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.03
0.02735133 = product of:
0.05470266 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.022357006 = product of:
0.04471401 = sum of:
0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04471401 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.03
0.02735133 = product of:
0.05470266 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.022357006 = product of:
0.04471401 = sum of:
0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04471401 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.03
0.0273355 = product of:
0.109342 = sum of:
0.109342 = sum of:
0.07101571 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07101571 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.02
0.02436481 = product of:
0.04872962 = sum of:
0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023104034 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.025625587 = product of:
0.051251173 = sum of:
0.051251173 = weight(_text_:management in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051251173 = score(doc=5767,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.4, S.297-308
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.02
0.023443995 = product of:
0.04688799 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.019163147 = product of:
0.038326293 = sum of:
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.02
0.023443995 = product of:
0.04688799 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.019163147 = product of:
0.038326293 = sum of:
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833
-
Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005)
0.02
0.022739384 = product of:
0.04547877 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.017753927 = product of:
0.035507854 = sum of:
0.035507854 = weight(_text_:management in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035507854 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Citation analysis is performed in order to evaluate authors and scientific collections, such as journals and conference proceedings. Currently, two major systems exist that perform citation analysis: Science Citation Index (SCI) by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and CiteSeer by the NEC Research Institute. The SCI, mostly a manual system up until recently, is based on the notion of the ISI Impact Factor, which has been used extensively for citation analysis purposes. On the other hand the CiteSeer system is an automatically built digital library using agents technology, also based on the notion of ISI Impact Factor. In this paper, we investigate new alternative notions besides the ISI impact factor, in order to provide a novel approach aiming at ranking scientific collections. Furthermore, we present a web-based system that has been built by extracting data from the Databases and Logic Programming (DBLP) website of the University of Trier. Our system, by using the new citation metrics, emerges as a useful tool for ranking scientific collections. In this respect, some first remarks are presented, e.g. on ranking conferences related to databases.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.289-312
-
Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980)
0.02
0.018483229 = product of:
0.073932916 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=1115,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Stockholm : Royal Institute of Technology Library
-
Bensman, S.J.: Garfield and the impact factors (2007)
0.02
0.018483229 = product of:
0.073932916 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 4680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=4680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4680)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.02
0.018458538 = product of:
0.07383415 = sum of:
0.07383415 = sum of:
0.035507854 = weight(_text_:management in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035507854 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.02
0.01562933 = product of:
0.03125866 = sum of:
0.018483229 = weight(_text_:technology in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018483229 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.012775432 = product of:
0.025550865 = sum of:
0.025550865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025550865 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.012775432 = product of:
0.05110173 = sum of:
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979)
0.01
0.012005211 = product of:
0.048020843 = sum of:
0.048020843 = weight(_text_:technology in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048020843 = score(doc=348,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.34197792 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- LCSH
- Technology / Abstracting and indexing
- Subject
- Technology / Abstracting and indexing
-
Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987)
0.01
0.011835951 = product of:
0.047343805 = sum of:
0.047343805 = product of:
0.09468761 = sum of:
0.09468761 = weight(_text_:management in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09468761 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
-
Rosenberg, V.: ¬An assessment of ISI's new Web of Science : ISI's services brings citiation indexing to new and advanced researchers (1998)
0.01
0.011552017 = product of:
0.04620807 = sum of:
0.04620807 = weight(_text_:technology in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04620807 = score(doc=1885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Comments on the affinity of Web technology and citation indexes and reviews the ISI service, Web of Science. Although still requiring refinement, it multiplies the effectiveness of an already effective search tool
-
Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003)
0.01
0.011435915 = product of:
0.04574366 = sum of:
0.04574366 = weight(_text_:technology in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04574366 = score(doc=1452,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Research fronts, defined as clusters of documents that tend to cite a fixed, time invariant set of base documents, are plotted as time lines for visualization and exploration. Using a set of documents related to the subject of anthrax research, this article illustrates the construction, exploration, and interpretation of time lines for the purpose of identifying and visualizing temporal changes in research activity through journal articles. Such information is useful for presentation to meinbers of expert panels used for technology forecasting.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.413-422
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.011291993 = product of:
0.04516797 = sum of:
0.04516797 = product of:
0.09033594 = sum of:
0.09033594 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033594 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
