Search (97 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.07 
    0.07272456 = product of:
  0.14544912 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.11772427 = sum of:
      0.07939798 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07939798 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04714662 = queryNorm
          0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038326293 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04714662 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  2. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.04 
    0.038914666 = product of:
  0.07782933 = sum of:
    0.05227847 = weight(_text_:technology in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05227847 = score(doc=1757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
    0.025550865 = product of:
      0.05110173 = sum of:
        0.05110173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05110173 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  3. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.03 
    0.031981617 = product of:
  0.063963234 = sum of:
    0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032345653 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.03161758 = product of:
      0.06323516 = sum of:
        0.06323516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06323516 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  4. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.03 
    0.03125866 = product of:
  0.06251732 = sum of:
    0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036966458 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.025550865 = product of:
      0.05110173 = sum of:
        0.05110173 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05110173 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  5. Temmerman, P.: ISAD(G): de definitieve standaard? (1994) 0.03 
    0.03031918 = product of:
  0.06063836 = sum of:
    0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036966458 = score(doc=7797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
    0.023671903 = product of:
      0.047343805 = sum of:
        0.047343805 = weight(_text_:management in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047343805 = score(doc=7797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Despite the extensive use of automation for archive management the creation of ISAD(G) (General International Standard Archival Description) was only accepted in January 1992. A special adaptation of the ISBD had already enabled a start to be made on creating MARC format records for archive collections. ISAD(G) will facilitate the exchange of data among collections. Whether the new standard will be suitable for all forms of archive depends on the willingness of archivists to adopt new technology
  6. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.03 
    0.029186 = product of:
  0.058372 = sum of:
    0.03920885 = weight(_text_:technology in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03920885 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.019163147 = product of:
      0.038326293 = sum of:
        0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038326293 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  7. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.03 
    0.02735133 = product of:
  0.05470266 = sum of:
    0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032345653 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
    0.022357006 = product of:
      0.04471401 = sum of:
        0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04471401 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  8. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.03 
    0.02735133 = product of:
  0.05470266 = sum of:
    0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032345653 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
    0.022357006 = product of:
      0.04471401 = sum of:
        0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04471401 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  9. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.02 
    0.024321668 = product of:
  0.048643336 = sum of:
    0.032674044 = weight(_text_:technology in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032674044 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
    0.01596929 = product of:
      0.03193858 = sum of:
        0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03193858 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009) 0.02 
    0.023443995 = product of:
  0.04688799 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
    0.019163147 = product of:
      0.038326293 = sum of:
        0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038326293 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:38
  11. Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010) 0.02 
    0.022739384 = product of:
  0.04547877 = sum of:
    0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027724843 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
    0.017753927 = product of:
      0.035507854 = sum of:
        0.035507854 = weight(_text_:management in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035507854 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
  12. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.02 
    0.02153496 = product of:
  0.08613984 = sum of:
    0.08613984 = sum of:
      0.041425828 = weight(_text_:management in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041425828 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04714662 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04471401 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04714662 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  13. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.02 
    0.019536663 = product of:
  0.039073326 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
    0.01596929 = product of:
      0.03193858 = sum of:
        0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03193858 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  14. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.02 
    0.018949486 = product of:
  0.037898973 = sum of:
    0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023104034 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
    0.014794939 = product of:
      0.029589878 = sum of:
        0.029589878 = weight(_text_:management in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029589878 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.651-662
  15. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1991) 0.02 
    0.016172826 = product of:
  0.064691305 = sum of:
    0.064691305 = weight(_text_:technology in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064691305 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005) 0.02 
    0.01515959 = product of:
  0.03031918 = sum of:
    0.018483229 = weight(_text_:technology in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018483229 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
    0.011835951 = product of:
      0.023671903 = sum of:
        0.023671903 = weight(_text_:management in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023671903 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
  17. Format integration and its effect on cataloging, training, and systems (1993) 0.01 
    0.013862422 = product of:
  0.055449687 = sum of:
    0.055449687 = weight(_text_:technology in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055449687 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries 13(1994) no.1, S.78-79 (K.L. Walter)
  18. Nichols introduces MARCit (1998) 0.01 
    0.013862422 = product of:
  0.055449687 = sum of:
    0.055449687 = weight(_text_:technology in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055449687 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Advanced technology libraries. 27(1998) no.2, S.10-11
  19. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.01 
    0.013862422 = product of:
  0.055449687 = sum of:
    0.055449687 = weight(_text_:technology in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055449687 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04714662 = queryNorm
        0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  20. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.013550392 = product of:
  0.05420157 = sum of:
    0.05420157 = product of:
      0.10840314 = sum of:
        0.10840314 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10840314 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 16
  • f 4
  • nl 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 80
  • m 9
  • s 6
  • el 4
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes