-
Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985)
0.08
0.07751122 = product of:
0.15502244 = sum of:
0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966458 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.118055984 = sum of:
0.066954255 = weight(_text_:management in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066954255 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.05110173 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05110173 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Traditional cataloging support services such as typing and filing are gradually being eliminated in favor of more sophisticated skills. Library staff members who are specialized in imminently obsolete skills must be re-educated to become productive participants in the "Golden Age" of technology. The Catalog Management section at the Iowa State University Library is attempting to make this process painless and exciting for all of its employees.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:11
-
Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009)
0.06
0.06377628 = product of:
0.12755255 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.09982771 = sum of:
0.061501414 = weight(_text_:management in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061501414 = score(doc=2766,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:20:24
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.06
0.059242748 = product of:
0.118485495 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.08613984 = sum of:
0.041425828 = weight(_text_:management in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041425828 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04471401 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000)
0.06
0.0565215 = product of:
0.113043 = sum of:
0.03920885 = weight(_text_:technology in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03920885 = score(doc=5386,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.07383415 = sum of:
0.035507854 = weight(_text_:management in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035507854 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
- Date
- 27. 7.2006 18:22:11
-
Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003)
0.04
0.03919066 = product of:
0.07838132 = sum of:
0.056024317 = weight(_text_:technology in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056024317 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.39897424 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.022357006 = product of:
0.04471401 = sum of:
0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04471401 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.03
0.03405033 = product of:
0.06810066 = sum of:
0.04574366 = weight(_text_:technology in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04574366 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.022357006 = product of:
0.04471401 = sum of:
0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04471401 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bednar, M.; Brisson, R.; Hewes, J.: Pursuing the three Ts : how total quality management, technology, and teams transformed the cataloging department at Penn State (2000)
0.03
0.03215835 = product of:
0.0643167 = sum of:
0.03920885 = weight(_text_:technology in 5387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03920885 = score(doc=5387,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5387, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5387)
0.025107846 = product of:
0.05021569 = sum of:
0.05021569 = weight(_text_:management in 5387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05021569 = score(doc=5387,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 5387, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Beginning in 1992 the University Libraries at the Pennsylvania State University embarked on a program to formally transform its organization following the principles of Continuous Quality Improvement, or, as it is more commonly known, Total Quality Management. The process by which the Cataloging Department underwent reorganization into teams is described, as well as its strategic use of computing technology in rationalizing and streamlining its workflows. In creating an organizational restructuring that permitted a more rapid and flexible response to new assignments and changing conditions, the Cataloging Department positioned itself to effectively assume new responsibilities as emerging formats and other library materials were acquired or made accessible to library patrons. The essay concludes with a frank assessment of the lessons learned in undergoing reorganization, as well as weighing the successes and failures experienced by the Cataloging Department.
-
Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996)
0.03
0.03125866 = product of:
0.06251732 = sum of:
0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966458 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.025550865 = product of:
0.05110173 = sum of:
0.05110173 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05110173 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.03
0.03125866 = product of:
0.06251732 = sum of:
0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966458 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.025550865 = product of:
0.05110173 = sum of:
0.05110173 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05110173 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Wool, G.: ¬A mediation on metadata (1998)
0.03
0.03031918 = product of:
0.06063836 = sum of:
0.036966458 = weight(_text_:technology in 2210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966458 = score(doc=2210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2210)
0.023671903 = product of:
0.047343805 = sum of:
0.047343805 = weight(_text_:management in 2210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047343805 = score(doc=2210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2210)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata, or 'data about data', have been created and used for centuries in the print environment, though the term has its origins in the world of electronic information management. Presents the close relationship between traditional library cataloguing and the documentation of electronic data files (known as 'metadata'), showing that cataloguing is changing under the influence of information technology, but also that metadata provision is essentially an extension of traditional cataloguing processes
-
Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012)
0.03
0.029149815 = product of:
0.05829963 = sum of:
0.032674044 = weight(_text_:technology in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032674044 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
0.025625587 = product of:
0.051251173 = sum of:
0.051251173 = weight(_text_:management in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051251173 = score(doc=2086,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
- LCSH
- Libraries / information technology
- RSWK
- Metadaten / Management (BVB)
- Subject
- Metadaten / Management (BVB)
Libraries / information technology
-
Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016)
0.03
0.027993329 = product of:
0.055986658 = sum of:
0.04001737 = weight(_text_:technology in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04001737 = score(doc=2786,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
0.01596929 = product of:
0.03193858 = sum of:
0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03193858 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book looks at the ways that we define the things of the bibliographic world, and in particular how our bibliographic models reflect our technology and the assumed goals of libraries. There is, of course, a history behind this, as well as a present and a future. The first part of the book begins by looking at the concept of the 'work' in library cataloging theory, and how that concept has evolved since the mid-nineteenth century to date. Next it talks about models and technology, two areas that need to be understood before taking a long look at where we are today. It then examines the new bibliographic model called Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the technical and social goals that the FRBR Study Group was tasked to address. The FRBR entities are analyzed in some detail. Finally, FRBR as an entity-relation model is compared to a small set of Semantic Web vocabularies that can be seen as variants of the multi-entity bibliographic model that FRBR introduced.
- Content
- Part I. Work, model, technologyThe work -- The model -- The technology -- Part II. FRBR and other solutions -- Introduction -- FRBR : standard for international sharing -- The entity-relation model -- What is modeled in FRBR -- Does FRBR meet FRBR's objectives? -- Some issues that arise -- Bibliographic description and the Semantic Web.
- Date
- 12. 2.2016 16:22:58
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.03
0.02735133 = product of:
0.05470266 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.022357006 = product of:
0.04471401 = sum of:
0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04471401 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Little, J.: ¬The impact of technology on cataloguing (1997)
0.03
0.026529282 = product of:
0.053058565 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=1620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
0.020712914 = product of:
0.041425828 = sum of:
0.041425828 = weight(_text_:management in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041425828 = score(doc=1620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the management of the impact of technological change on technical services, especially cataloguing. Describes a number of library applications of recent and developing technologies, starting with the more familiar and firmly established such as OPACs and library networks then moving to less established applications such as electronic publishing and expert systems. Considers the impact these will have on the work and workflow of cataloguing including changing the mission of the library, providing alternatives to original cataloguing, changes to the number and training level of staff required, and reducing the gap between technical and public services. Argues that some of the effects of technological change are predictable and as libraries introduce changes they need to plan for the effects
-
Martin, C.: ¬The organization of the cataloguing function at McMaster University (2000)
0.03
0.026529282 = product of:
0.053058565 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=5377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
0.020712914 = product of:
0.041425828 = sum of:
0.041425828 = weight(_text_:management in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041425828 = score(doc=5377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Many technology-related changes in technical services have affected not only what we catalogue, but how access is provided. At the McMaster University Library, there have been many changes in the organizational structure and composition of the Bibliographic Services division in the past few years. This paper will document the management of the cataloguing and maintenance functions and the organization of information at a Canadian academic library. Future trends and how the library is planning for them are also discussed.
-
Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003)
0.02
0.024611384 = product of:
0.098445535 = sum of:
0.098445535 = sum of:
0.047343805 = weight(_text_:management in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047343805 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.05110173 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05110173 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.02
0.024321668 = product of:
0.048643336 = sum of:
0.032674044 = weight(_text_:technology in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032674044 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.01596929 = product of:
0.03193858 = sum of:
0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03193858 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000)
0.02
0.023443995 = product of:
0.04688799 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.019163147 = product of:
0.038326293 = sum of:
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.02
0.023443995 = product of:
0.04688799 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.019163147 = product of:
0.038326293 = sum of:
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.02
0.023443995 = product of:
0.04688799 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.019163147 = product of:
0.038326293 = sum of:
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
