Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  1. Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: Social intelligence (1993) 0.08
    0.08038218 = product of:
      0.20095545 = sum of:
        0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07196287 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
        0.12899259 = weight(_text_:social in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12899259 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 28(1993), S.1-44
  2. Cronin, B.: ¬The sociological turn in information science (2009) 0.06
    0.059076924 = product of:
      0.14769231 = sum of:
        0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035981435 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.11171087 = weight(_text_:social in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11171087 = score(doc=3655,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.6104709 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the history of 'the social' in information science. It traces the influence of social scientific thinking on the development of the field's intellectual base. The continuing appropriation of both theoretical and methodological insights from domains such as social studies of science, science and technology studies, and socio-technical systems is discussed.
  3. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.04
    0.042596024 = product of:
      0.10649006 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
        0.043522544 = product of:
          0.08704509 = sum of:
            0.08704509 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08704509 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.433
  4. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.04
    0.042596024 = product of:
      0.10649006 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
        0.043522544 = product of:
          0.08704509 = sum of:
            0.08704509 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08704509 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.435-436
  5. Lee, C.J.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Zhang, G.; Cronin, B.: Bias in peer review (2013) 0.04
    0.03815789 = product of:
      0.09539472 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
        0.068408646 = weight(_text_:social in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068408646 = score(doc=525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3738355 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self-regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated, raises questions about the normative implications of research on bias in peer review. This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review; articulates and critiques the conception of bias unifying research on bias in peer review; characterizes and examines the empirical, methodological, and normative claims of bias in peer review research; and assesses possible alternatives to the status quo. We close by identifying ways to expand conceptions and studies of bias to contend with the complexity of social interactions among actors involved directly and indirectly in peer review.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.2-17
  6. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.04
    0.036510877 = product of:
      0.09127719 = sum of:
        0.05397215 = weight(_text_:technology in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05397215 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
        0.03730504 = product of:
          0.07461008 = sum of:
            0.07461008 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07461008 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.873-875
  7. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.04
    0.035167206 = product of:
      0.08791801 = sum of:
        0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03148376 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
        0.056434255 = weight(_text_:social in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056434255 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.2, S.160-168
  8. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012) 0.03
    0.031798244 = product of:
      0.07949561 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
        0.057007212 = weight(_text_:social in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057007212 = score(doc=244,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3115296 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.997-1016
  9. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.02
    0.019348888 = product of:
      0.09674444 = sum of:
        0.09674444 = weight(_text_:social in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09674444 = score(doc=1825,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
  10. Cronin, B.: Social development and the role of information (1995) 0.02
    0.015962018 = product of:
      0.07981009 = sum of:
        0.07981009 = weight(_text_:social in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07981009 = score(doc=5678,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.43614143 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the complex relationship between information investment and socio-economic development with special reference to the relevance and appropriateness of the information services offered to developinf countries. Emphasises the importance of cultural relativism in the varying potential of information to influence social development. Proposes a civic networking model which contributes to the empowerment of the people by ensuring that: citizens are provided with free or subsidized access to community (and other) information resources; the local community has a high level of equity/ownership in the design and maintenance of the information system/service; and content is locally negotiated and validated
  11. Cronin, B.: Library and information science in context (1998) 0.01
    0.012899259 = product of:
      0.06449629 = sum of:
        0.06449629 = weight(_text_:social in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06449629 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the ways in which the library and information science (LIS) profession is adapting to the growing informatization of society, the emergence of an information society and how librarians and information scientists are positioning themselves as players in an information society, characterized by metaphors such as 'information superhighway' and 'Worldwide Library'. Identifies major change drivers and considers the kinds of strategic responses being made by, and required of, the LIS field in the face of pervasive technologization and shifting social practices
  12. Cronin, B.: Standing on ceremony (2013) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1309-1310
  13. Cronin, B.: Peer review (2011) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1215
  14. Cronin, B.: Meta-life (2014) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.431-432
  15. Cronin, B.: ¬The evolving indicator space (iSpace) (2013) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1523-1525
  16. Cronin, B.: Language matters (2012) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=4505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.217
  17. Cronin, B.: Self-plagiarism : an odious oxymoron (2013) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=456,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 456, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=456)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.873
  18. Cronin, B.: Brian Vickery : an appreciation (2010) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.850-851
  19. Cronin, B.: ¬The intelligence disconnect (2011) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 4930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=4930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4930)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1867-1868
  20. Cronin, B.: Don't confuse accreditation with reputation (2011) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2299-2300