-
Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011)
0.05
0.04587246 = product of:
0.114681154 = sum of:
0.031803396 = weight(_text_:technology in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031803396 = score(doc=4452,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
0.08287776 = sum of:
0.051790226 = weight(_text_:aspects in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051790226 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
0.031087535 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031087535 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Informational cities are prototypical cities of the knowledge society. If they are informational world cities, they are new centers of power. According to Manuel Castells (1989), in those cities space of flows (flows of money, power, and information) tend to override space of places. Information and communication technology infrastructures, cognitive infrastructures (as groundwork of knowledge cities and creative cities), and city-level knowledge management are of great importance. Digital libraries provide access to the global explicit knowledge. The informational city consists of creative clusters and spaces for personal contacts to stimulate sharing of implicit information. In such cities, we can observe job polarization in favor of well-trained employees. The corporate structure of informational cities is made up of financial services, knowledge-intensive high-tech industrial enterprises, companies of the information economy, and further creative and knowledge-intensive service enterprises. Weak location factors are facilities for culture, recreational activities, and consumption. Political willingness to create an informational city and e-governance activities are crucial aspects for the development of such cities. This conceptual article frames indicators which are able to mark the degree of "informativeness" of a city. Finally, based upon findings of network economy, we try to explain why certain cities master the transition to informational cities and others (lagging to relative insignificance) do not. The article connects findings of information science and of urbanistics and urban planning.
- Date
- 3. 7.2011 19:22:49
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.963-986
-
Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006)
0.03
0.034060966 = product of:
0.08515241 = sum of:
0.055855434 = weight(_text_:social in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055855434 = score(doc=76,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.30523545 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.029296976 = product of:
0.05859395 = sum of:
0.05859395 = weight(_text_:aspects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05859395 = score(doc=76,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.28249177 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
-
Stock, W.G.: Concepts and semantic relations in information science (2010)
0.03
0.02511943 = product of:
0.062798575 = sum of:
0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022488397 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04031018 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Concept-based information retrieval and knowledge representation are in need of a theory of concepts and semantic relations. Guidelines for the construction and maintenance of knowledge organization systems (KOS) (such as ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005 in the U.S.A. or DIN 2331:1980 in Germany) do not consider results of concept theory and theory of relations to the full extent. They are not able to unify the currently different worlds of traditional controlled vocabularies, of the social web (tagging and folksonomies) and of the semantic web (ontologies). Concept definitions as well as semantic relations are based on epistemological theories (empiricism, rationalism, hermeneutics, pragmatism, and critical theory). A concept is determined via its intension and extension as well as by definition. We will meet the problem of vagueness by introducing prototypes. Some important definitions are concept explanations (after Aristotle) and the definition of family resemblances (in the sense of Wittgenstein). We will model concepts as frames (according to Barsalou). The most important paradigmatic relation in KOS is hierarchy, which must be arranged into different classes: Hyponymy consists of taxonomy and simple hyponymy, meronymy consists of many different part-whole-relations. For practical application purposes, the transitivity of the given relation is very important. Unspecific associative relations are of little help to our focused applications and should be replaced by generalizable and domain-specific relations. We will discuss the reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity of paradigmatic relations as well as the appearance of specific semantic relations in the different kinds of KOS (folksonomies, nomenclatures, classification systems, thesauri, and ontologies). Finally, we will pick out KOS as a central theme of the Semantic Web.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.1951-1969
-
Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004)
0.02
0.020095546 = product of:
0.050238863 = sum of:
0.017990718 = weight(_text_:technology in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017990718 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
0.032248147 = weight(_text_:social in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032248147 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.17622775 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.13, S.1155-1168
-
Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G.: Jedem seine eigene "Truman Show" : YouNow, Periscope, Ustream und ihre Nutzer - "Social Live"-Streaming Services (2017)
0.02
0.015962018 = product of:
0.07981009 = sum of:
0.07981009 = weight(_text_:social in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07981009 = score(doc=3770,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.43614143 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Die seinerzeit 19-jährige Studentin Katrin Scheibe war 2015 Teilnehmerin an einem Seminar der Uni Düsseldorf über "Social Live"-Streaming Services und hat mit anderen Studenten zusammen eine Live-Übertragung einer Sitzung über YouNow durchgeführt. Innerhalb des rund einstündigen Programms schnellte die Zuschauerzahl auf weit über 200 hoch. Die meist jugendlichen Zuseher empfanden es als höchst interessant, eine Uni-Lehrveranstaltung hautnah miterleben zu dürfen. Ebenso waren die Studenten von dem aktuellen und zeitnahen Thema begeistert und publizierten ihre Forschungsresultate unter einem Pseudonym (Mathilde B. Friedländer) in internationalen Fachzeitschriften.
-
Gremm, J.; Barth, J.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G.: Transitioning towards knowledge society : Qatar as a case study (2018)
0.02
0.015962018 = product of:
0.07981009 = sum of:
0.07981009 = weight(_text_:social in 4251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07981009 = score(doc=4251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.43614143 = fieldWeight in 4251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4251)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- LCSH
- Social sciences
- Subject
- Social sciences
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980)
0.01
0.009948011 = product of:
0.049740054 = sum of:
0.049740054 = product of:
0.09948011 = sum of:
0.09948011 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948011 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
-
Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995)
0.01
0.009948011 = product of:
0.049740054 = sum of:
0.049740054 = product of:
0.09948011 = sum of:
0.09948011 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948011 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004)
0.01
0.009948011 = product of:
0.049740054 = sum of:
0.049740054 = product of:
0.09948011 = sum of:
0.09948011 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948011 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27.11.2005 18:04:22
-
Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999)
0.01
0.009674444 = product of:
0.04837222 = sum of:
0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04837222 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Object
- Social Sciences Citation Index
-
Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998)
0.01
0.008704509 = product of:
0.043522544 = sum of:
0.043522544 = product of:
0.08704509 = sum of:
0.08704509 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08704509 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
-
Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011)
0.01
0.008062037 = product of:
0.04031018 = sum of:
0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04031018 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Stock, W.G.; Stock, M.: Handbook of information science : a comprehensive handbook (2013)
0.01
0.008062037 = product of:
0.04031018 = sum of:
0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04031018 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Dealing with information is one of the vital skills in the 21st century. It takes a fair degree of information savvy to create, represent and supply information as well as to search for and retrieve relevant knowledge. How does information (documents, pieces of knowledge) have to be organized in order to be retrievable? What role does metadata play? What are search engines on the Web, or in corporate intranets, and how do they work? How must one deal with natural language processing and tools of knowledge organization, such as thesauri, classification systems, and ontologies? How useful is social tagging? How valuable are intellectually created abstracts and automatically prepared extracts? Which empirical methods allow for user research and which for the evaluation of information systems? This Handbook is a basic work of information science, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of information retrieval and knowledge representation. It addresses readers from all professions and scientific disciplines, but particularly scholars, practitioners and students of Information Science, Library Science, Computer Science, Information Management, and Knowledge Management. This Handbook is a suitable reference work for Public and Academic Libraries.
-
Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Information markets : a strategic guideline for the i-commerce (2011)
0.01
0.0076328157 = product of:
0.03816408 = sum of:
0.03816408 = weight(_text_:technology in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03816408 = score(doc=3283,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- LCSH
- Information technology / Management
- Subject
- Information technology / Management
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006)
0.01
0.0076328157 = product of:
0.03816408 = sum of:
0.03816408 = weight(_text_:technology in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03816408 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1794-1803
-
Stock, W.G.: On relevance distributions (2006)
0.01
0.007196287 = product of:
0.035981435 = sum of:
0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035981435 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1126-1129
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.006217507 = product of:
0.031087535 = sum of:
0.031087535 = product of:
0.06217507 = sum of:
0.06217507 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217507 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011)
0.00
0.0049740053 = product of:
0.024870027 = sum of:
0.024870027 = product of:
0.049740054 = sum of:
0.049740054 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049740054 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 23. 9.2010 11:15:22
-
Schmidt, S.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in images : a study in emotional information retrieval (2009)
0.00
0.0044976794 = product of:
0.022488397 = sum of:
0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022488397 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.5, S.863-876
-
Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014)
0.00
0.0043522543 = product of:
0.021761272 = sum of:
0.021761272 = product of:
0.043522544 = sum of:
0.043522544 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043522544 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 18:56:46
