Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, X."
  1. Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023) 0.09
    0.085429825 = product of:
      0.14238304 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.09674444 = weight(_text_:social in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09674444 = score(doc=1067,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.01865252 = product of:
          0.03730504 = sum of:
            0.03730504 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03730504 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Social question-and-answer (Q&A) communities are becoming increasingly important for knowledge acquisition. However, some users withhold knowledge, which can hinder the effectiveness of these platforms. Based on social exchange theory, the study investigates how different types of questions influence knowledge withholding, with question difficulty and user anonymity as boundary conditions. Two experiments were conducted to test hypotheses. Results indicate that informational questions are more likely to lead to knowledge withholding than conversational ones, as they elicit more fear of negative evaluation and fear of exploitation. The study also examines the interplay of question difficulty and user anonymity with question type. Overall, this study significantly extends the existing literature on counterproductive knowledge behavior by exploring the antecedents of knowledge withholding in social Q&A communities.
    Date
    22. 9.2023 13:51:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1170-1184
  2. Sun, Y.; Wang, N.; Shen, X.-L.; Zhang, X.: Bias effects, synergistic effects, and information contingency effects : developing and testing an extended information adoption model in social Q&A (2019) 0.04
    0.04262909 = product of:
      0.106572725 = sum of:
        0.03816408 = weight(_text_:technology in 5439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03816408 = score(doc=5439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5439)
        0.068408646 = weight(_text_:social in 5439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068408646 = score(doc=5439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3738355 = fieldWeight in 5439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5439)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    To advance the theoretical understanding on information adoption, this study tries to extend the information adoption model (IAM) in three ways. First, this study considers the relationship between source credibility and argument quality and the relationship between herding factors and information usefulness (i.e., bias effects). Second, this study proposes the interaction effects of source credibility and argument quality and the interaction effects of herding factors and information usefulness (i.e., synergistic effects). Third, this study explores the moderating role of an information characteristic - search versus experience information (i.e., information contingency effects). The proposed extended information adoption model (EIAM) is empirically tested through a 2 by 2 by 2 experiment in the social Q&A context, and the results confirm most of the hypotheses. Finally, theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed.
    Footnote
    Part of a special issue for research on people's engagement with technology.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.12, S.1368-1382
  3. Tay, W.; Zhang, X.; Karimi , S.: Beyond mean rating : probabilistic aggregation of star ratings based on helpfulness (2020) 0.03
    0.030143319 = product of:
      0.075358294 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
        0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04837222 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The star-rating mechanism of customer reviews is used universally by the online population to compare and select merchants, movies, products, and services. The consensus opinion from aggregation of star ratings is used as a proxy for item quality. Online reviews are noisy and effective aggregation of star ratings to accurately reflect the "true quality" of products and services is challenging. The mean-rating aggregation model is widely used and other aggregation models are also proposed. These existing aggregation models rely on a large number of reviews to tolerate noise. However, many products rarely have reviews. We propose probabilistic aggregation models for review ratings based on the Dirichlet distribution to combat data sparsity in reviews. We further propose to exploit the "helpfulness" social information and time to filter noisy reviews and effectively aggregate ratings to compute the consensus opinion. Our experiments on an Amazon data set show that our probabilistic aggregation models based on "helpfulness" achieve better performance than the statistical and heuristic baseline approaches.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.784-799
  4. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.02
    0.016575553 = product of:
      0.08287776 = sum of:
        0.08287776 = sum of:
          0.051790226 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051790226 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04589033 = queryNorm
              0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.031087535 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031087535 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04589033 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify key countries and their focal research fields on the information divide. Design/methodology/approach Literature was retrieved to identify key countries and their primary focus. The literature research method was adopted to identify aspects of the primary focus in each key country. Findings The key countries with literature on the information divide are the USA, China, the UK and India. The problem of health is prominent in the USA, and solutions include providing information, distinguishing users' profiles and improving eHealth literacy. Economic and political factors led to the urban-rural information divide in China, and policy is the most powerful solution. Under the influence of humanism, research on the information divide in the UK focuses on all age groups, and solutions differ according to age. Deep-rooted patriarchal concepts and traditional marriage customs make the gender information divide prominent in India, and increasing women's information consciousness is a feasible way to reduce this divide. Originality/value This paper is an extensive review study on the information divide, which clarifies the key countries and their focal fields in research on this topic. More important, the paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes existing literature from a country perspective.
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
  5. Zhang, X.: Concept integration of document databases using different indexing languages (2006) 0.01
    0.009674444 = product of:
      0.04837222 = sum of:
        0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04837222 = score(doc=962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=962)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An integrated information retrieval system generally contains multiple databases that are inconsistent in terms of their content and indexing. This paper proposes a rough set-based transfer (RST) model for integration of the concepts of document databases using various indexing languages, so that users can search through the multiple databases using any of the current indexing languages. The RST model aims to effectively create meaningful transfer relations between the terms of two indexing languages, provided a number of documents are indexed with them in parallel. In our experiment, the indexing concepts of two databases respectively using the Thesaurus of Social Science (IZ) and the Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) are integrated by means of the RST model. Finally, this paper compares the results achieved with a cross-concordance method, a conditional probability based method and the RST model.
  6. Zhang, X.; Han, H.: ¬An empirical testing of user stereotypes of information retrieval systems (2005) 0.01
    0.008062037 = product of:
      0.04031018 = sum of:
        0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04031018 = score(doc=1031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Stereotyping is a technique used in many information systems to represent user groups and/or to generate initial individual user models. However, there has been a lack of evidence on the accuracy of their use in representing users. We propose a formal evaluation method to test the accuracy or homogeneity of the stereotypes that are based on users' explicit characteristics. Using the method, the results of an empirical testing on 11 common user stereotypes of information retrieval (IR) systems are reported. The participants' memberships in the stereotypes were predicted using discriminant analysis, based on their IR knowledge. The actual membership and the predicted membership of each stereotype were compared. The data show that "librarians/IR professionals" is an accurate stereotype in representing its members, while some others, such as "undergraduate students" and "social sciences/humanities" users, are not accurate stereotypes. The data also demonstrate that based on the user's IR knowledge a stereotype can be made more accurate or homogeneous. The results show the promise that our method can help better detect the differences among stereotype members, and help with better stereotype design and user modeling. We assume that accurate stereotypes have better performance in user modeling and thus the system performance. Limitations and future directions of the study are discussed.
  7. Zhang, X.; Chignell, M.: Assessment of the effects of user characteristics on mental models of information retrieval systems (2001) 0.01
    0.005397215 = product of:
      0.026986076 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 5753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=5753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5753)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.6, S.445-459
  8. Zhang, X.: Collaborative relevance judgment : a group consensus method for evaluating user search performance (2002) 0.01
    0.005397215 = product of:
      0.026986076 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.220-231
  9. Ho, S.M.; Bieber, M.; Song, M.; Zhang, X.: Seeking beyond with IntegraL : a user study of sense-making enabled by anchor-based virtual integration of library systems (2013) 0.01
    0.005397215 = product of:
      0.026986076 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 1037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=1037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1037)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.9, S.1927-1945
  10. Zhang, X.; Fang, Y.; He, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.: Epistemic motivation, task reflexivity, and knowledge contribution behavior on team wikis : a cross-level moderation model (2019) 0.01
    0.005397215 = product of:
      0.026986076 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 5245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=5245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5245)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.5, S.448-461
  11. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.: Effects of interaction design in digital libraries on user interactions (2008) 0.01
    0.005179023 = product of:
      0.025895113 = sum of:
        0.025895113 = product of:
          0.051790226 = sum of:
            0.051790226 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051790226 = score(doc=1898,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 1898, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1898)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study aims to investigate the effects of different search and browse features in digital libraries (DLs) on task interactions, and what features would lead to poor user experience. Design/methodology/approach - Three operational DLs: ACM, IEEE CS, and IEEE Xplore are used in this study. These three DLs present different features in their search and browsing designs. Two information-seeking tasks are constructed: one search task and one browsing task. An experiment was conducted in a usability laboratory. Data from 35 participants are collected on a set of measures for user interactions. Findings - The results demonstrate significant differences in many aspects of the user interactions between the three DLs. For both search and browse designs, the features that lead to poor user interactions are identified. Research limitations/implications - User interactions are affected by specific design features in DLs. Some of the design features may lead to poor user performance and should be improved. The study was limited mainly in the variety and the number of tasks used. Originality/value - The study provided empirical evidence to the effects of interaction design features in DLs on user interactions and performance. The results contribute to our knowledge about DL designs in general and about the three operational DLs in particular.
  12. Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Cole, M.; Belkin, N.: Predicting users' domain knowledge in information retrieval using multiple regression analysis of search behaviors (2015) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 1822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=1822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1822)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.980-1000
  13. Liu, J.; Zhang, X.: ¬The role of domain knowledge in document selection from search results (2019) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 5410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=5410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5410)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.11, S.1236-1247
  14. Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.1, S.115-127