-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992)
0.04
0.04019109 = product of:
0.100477725 = sum of:
0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035981435 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
0.06449629 = weight(_text_:social in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06449629 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 11(1992) no.2, S.120-131
-
Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999)
0.03
0.026809895 = product of:
0.06702474 = sum of:
0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04837222 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.01865252 = product of:
0.03730504 = sum of:
0.03730504 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730504 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:35:09
-
Place, E.: International collaboration on Internet subject gateways (2000)
0.02
0.02234158 = product of:
0.055853948 = sum of:
0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04031018 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
0.015543767 = product of:
0.031087535 = sum of:
0.031087535 = weight(_text_:22 in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031087535 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:35:35
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.02
0.019890662 = product of:
0.09945331 = sum of:
0.09945331 = sum of:
0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06214827 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.03730504 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730504 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.02
0.016858585 = product of:
0.042146463 = sum of:
0.008995359 = weight(_text_:technology in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008995359 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.065813676 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.033151105 = sum of:
0.02071609 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02071609 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.09987592 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.012435013 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012435013 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
-
Richmond, P.A.: Futuristic aspects of subject access (1983)
0.02
0.016572872 = product of:
0.08286436 = sum of:
0.08286436 = product of:
0.16572872 = sum of:
0.16572872 = weight(_text_:aspects in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16572872 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.79900736 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Tunkelang, D.: Faceted search (2009)
0.02
0.015482724 = product of:
0.03870681 = sum of:
0.017990718 = weight(_text_:technology in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017990718 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
0.02071609 = product of:
0.04143218 = sum of:
0.04143218 = weight(_text_:aspects in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04143218 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.19975184 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We live in an information age that requires us, more than ever, to represent, access, and use information. Over the last several decades, we have developed a modern science and technology for information retrieval, relentlessly pursuing the vision of a "memex" that Vannevar Bush proposed in his seminal article, "As We May Think." Faceted search plays a key role in this program. Faceted search addresses weaknesses of conventional search approaches and has emerged as a foundation for interactive information retrieval. User studies demonstrate that faceted search provides more effective information-seeking support to users than best-first search. Indeed, faceted search has become increasingly prevalent in online information access systems, particularly for e-commerce and site search. In this lecture, we explore the history, theory, and practice of faceted search. Although we cannot hope to be exhaustive, our aim is to provide sufficient depth and breadth to offer a useful resource to both researchers and practitioners. Because faceted search is an area of interest to computer scientists, information scientists, interface designers, and usability researchers, we do not assume that the reader is a specialist in any of these fields. Rather, we offer a self-contained treatment of the topic, with an extensive bibliography for those who would like to pursue particular aspects in more depth.
-
Huestis, J.C.: Clustering LC Classification numbers in an online catalog for improved browsability (1988)
0.01
0.014392574 = product of:
0.07196287 = sum of:
0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07196287 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 7(1988), S.381-393
-
Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification as an online retrieval tool : potentials and limitations (1986)
0.01
0.012593503 = product of:
0.06296752 = sum of:
0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06296752 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 5(1986), S.181-192
-
Cochrane, P.A.; Markey, K.: Preparing for the use of classification in online cataloging systems and in online catalogs (1985)
0.01
0.012593503 = product of:
0.06296752 = sum of:
0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 2087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06296752 = score(doc=2087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 2087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2087)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 4(1985), S.107 -
-
Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001)
0.01
0.012593503 = product of:
0.06296752 = sum of:
0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06296752 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
-
Heiser, W.J.: Zoeken in de bibliografische ruimte : de bijzondere rol van de hierarchische classificaties bij geautomatiseerde onderwerpsontsluiting (1993)
0.01
0.011286851 = product of:
0.056434255 = sum of:
0.056434255 = weight(_text_:social in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056434255 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The universal classification schemes developed in the 19th century are a direct response to the social changes of that era. However, the increasing use of automation in libraries has highlighted the need fir greater precision in hierarchical structures. A thesaurus of used and related headings can be employed to show the spatial relationship of semantic terms. The resulting search profile can be further enhanced by the addition of citation weighting. To assist users to define searches more accurately libraries using large general classification schemes should consider adding supplementary classification data to records
-
Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996)
0.01
0.01079443 = product of:
0.05397215 = sum of:
0.05397215 = weight(_text_:technology in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05397215 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988)
0.01
0.010177087 = product of:
0.050885435 = sum of:
0.050885435 = weight(_text_:technology in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050885435 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
-
Dhyani, P.: Library classification in computer age (1999)
0.01
0.010177087 = product of:
0.050885435 = sum of:
0.050885435 = weight(_text_:technology in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050885435 = score(doc=3153,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Library classification is constantly being influenced by multifaceted, multidimensional, and infinite growth of literature on one hand and the users needs on the other. Dewey pioneered in devising a scheme of classification for the documentation utility of the organised knowledge. Subsequent schemes of classification worked purely without any theoretical foundation, colon classification being the exception. With the emergence of computer technology the library classification is being metamorphised. This paper attempts to delve a state-of-the-art of library classification in the new computer age.
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 19(1999) no.3, S.5-13
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.01
0.009948011 = product of:
0.049740054 = sum of:
0.049740054 = product of:
0.09948011 = sum of:
0.09948011 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948011 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Faceted classification of information (o.J.)
0.01
0.008995359 = product of:
0.044976793 = sum of:
0.044976793 = weight(_text_:technology in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044976793 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- An explanation of faceted classification meant for people working in knowledge management. An example given for a high-technology company has the fundamental categories Products, Applications, Organizations, People, Domain objects ("technologies applied in the marketplace in which the organization participates"), Events (i.e. time), and Publications.
-
Watanabe, T.: ¬An experimental OPAC system using NDC8 to improve subject access (1994)
0.01
0.008286436 = product of:
0.04143218 = sum of:
0.04143218 = product of:
0.08286436 = sum of:
0.08286436 = weight(_text_:aspects in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08286436 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Description of an attempt to improve OPAC subject access at Kobe University Library using Nippon Decimal Classification, 8th ed. (NDC8). Examines the theoretical aspects of using a classification for subject searching, then explains the Kobe system. Using the NDC8 machine-readable data file, a database was created for the OPAC, incorporating class numbers and subject headings. Difficulties arise from subdivisions and the structure of NDC8 itself, but it is an important area for development
-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.01
0.0076328157 = product of:
0.03816408 = sum of:
0.03816408 = weight(_text_:technology in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03816408 = score(doc=5698,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.0074610077 = product of:
0.03730504 = sum of:
0.03730504 = product of:
0.07461008 = sum of:
0.07461008 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07461008 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
