-
Park, H.W.; Barnett, G.A.; Nam, I.-Y.: Hyperlink - affiliation network structure of top Web sites : examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea (2002)
0.01
0.014850704 = product of:
0.04455211 = sum of:
0.04455211 = product of:
0.13365632 = sum of:
0.13365632 = weight(_text_:network in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13365632 = score(doc=584,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.6888462 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article argues that individual Web sites form hyperlink-affiliations with others for the purpose of strengthening their individual trust, expertness, and safety. It describes the hyperlink-affiliation network structure of Korea's top 152 Web sites. The data were obtained from their Web sites for October 2000. The results indicate that financial Web sites, such as credit card and stock Web sites, occupy the most central position in the network. A cluster analysis reveals that the structure of the hyperlink-affiliation network is influenced by the financial Web sites with which others are affiliated. These findings are discussed from the perspective of Web site credibility.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Park, H.W.; Wagner, C.: International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index : is internationalization leading the Network? (2014)
0.01
0.00918649 = product of:
0.02755947 = sum of:
0.02755947 = product of:
0.08267841 = sum of:
0.08267841 = weight(_text_:network in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08267841 = score(doc=1505,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- International coauthorship relations have increasingly shaped another dynamic in the natural and life sciences during recent decades. However, much less is known about such internationalization in the social sciences. In this study, we analyze international and domestic coauthorship relations of all citable items in the DVD version of the Social Sciences Citation Index 2011 (SSCI). Network statistics indicate 4 groups of nations: (a) an Asian-Pacific one to which all Anglo-Saxon nations (including the United Kingdom and Ireland) are attributed, (b) a continental European one including also the Latin-American countries, (c) the Scandinavian nations, and (d) a community of African nations. Within the EU-28, 11 of the EU-15 states have dominant positions. In many respects, the network parameters are not so different from the Science Citation Index. In addition to these descriptive statistics, we address the question of the relative weights of the international versus domestic networks. An information-theoretical test is proposed at the level of organizational addresses within each nation; the results are mixed, but the international dimension is more important than the national one in the aggregated sets (as in the Science Citation Index). In some countries (e.g., France), however, the national distribution is leading more than the international one. Decomposition of the United States in terms of states shows a similarly mixed result; more U.S. states are domestically oriented in the SSCI and more internationally in the SCI. The international networks have grown during the last decades in addition to the national ones but not by replacing them.
-
Choi, S.; Yang, J.S.W.; Park, H.W.: ¬The triple helix and international collaboration in science (2015)
0.01
0.00918649 = product of:
0.02755947 = sum of:
0.02755947 = product of:
0.08267841 = sum of:
0.08267841 = weight(_text_:network in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08267841 = score(doc=1616,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Previous studies of international scientific collaboration have rarely gone beyond revealing the structural relationships between countries. Considering how scientific collaboration is actually initiated, this study focuses on the organization and sector levels of international coauthorship networks, going beyond a country-level description. Based on a network analysis of coauthorship networks between members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), this study attempts to gain a better understanding of international scientific collaboration by exploring the structure of the coauthorship network in terms of university-industry-government (UIG) relationships, the mode of knowledge production, and the underlying dynamic of collaboration in terms of geographic, linguistic, and economic factors. The results suggest that the United States showed overwhelming dominance in all bilateral UIG combinations with the exception of the government-government (GG) network. Scientific collaboration within the industry sector was concentrated in a few players, whereas that between the university and industry sectors was relatively less concentrated. Despite the growing participation from other sectors, universities were still the main locus of knowledge production, with the exception of 5 countries. The university sector in English-speaking wealthy countries and the government sector of non-English-speaking, less-wealthy countries played a key role in international collaborations between OECD countries. The findings did not provide evidence supporting the institutional proximity argument.
