-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.02
0.02156037 = product of:
0.06468111 = sum of:
0.06468111 = product of:
0.09702166 = sum of:
0.06750664 = weight(_text_:network in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06750664 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.029515022 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029515022 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Object
- Social Science Research Network
-
Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018)
0.02
0.018448254 = product of:
0.05534476 = sum of:
0.05534476 = product of:
0.08301714 = sum of:
0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041696113 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132103 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 9.2018 12:22:39
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2018) H.1, S.21-29
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.02
0.01716654 = product of:
0.051499616 = sum of:
0.051499616 = product of:
0.07724942 = sum of:
0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047734402 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.029515022 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029515022 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between dissemination of research papers on Twitter and its influence on research impact. Design/methodology/approach Four types of journal Twitter accounts (journal, owner, publisher and no Twitter account) were defined to observe differences in the number of tweets and citations. In total, 4,176 articles from 350 journals were extracted from Plum Analytics. This altmetric provider tracks the number of tweets and citations for each paper. Student's t-test for two-paired samples was used to detect significant differences between each group of journals. Regression analysis was performed to detect which variables may influence the getting of tweets and citations. Findings The results show that journals with their own Twitter account obtain more tweets (46 percent) and citations (34 percent) than journals without a Twitter account. Followers is the variable that attracts more tweets (ß=0.47) and citations (ß=0.28) but the effect is small and the fit is not good for tweets (R2=0.46) and insignificant for citations (R2=0.18). Originality/value This is the first study that tests the performance of research journals on Twitter according to their handles, observing how the dissemination of content in this microblogging network influences the citation of their papers.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.01
0.009275677 = product of:
0.02782703 = sum of:
0.02782703 = product of:
0.08348109 = sum of:
0.08348109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08348109 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019)
0.01
0.009170768 = product of:
0.027512303 = sum of:
0.027512303 = product of:
0.082536906 = sum of:
0.082536906 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082536906 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 6.2019 17:46:17
4. 8.2019 19:52:29
- Issue
- [29. Juli 2019].
-
Moebius, R.: ¬Die Zitiercommunity (2019)
0.01
0.007942118 = product of:
0.023826351 = sum of:
0.023826351 = product of:
0.07147905 = sum of:
0.07147905 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07147905 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 4.2019 10:29:34
-
Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015)
0.01
0.007870673 = product of:
0.023612019 = sum of:
0.023612019 = product of:
0.07083605 = sum of:
0.07083605 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083605 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 4.2015 17:22:03
-
Zheng, H.; Aung, H.H.; Erdt, M.; Peng, T.-Q.; Raamkumar, A.S.; Theng, Y.-L.: Social media presence of scholarly journals (2019)
0.01
0.0053038225 = product of:
0.015911467 = sum of:
0.015911467 = product of:
0.047734402 = sum of:
0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 4987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047734402 = score(doc=4987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 4987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4987)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Recently, social media has become a potentially new way for scholarly journals to disseminate and evaluate research outputs. Scholarly journals have started promoting their research articles to a wide range of audiences via social media platforms. This article aims to investigate the social media presence of scholarly journals across disciplines. We extracted journals from Web of Science and searched for the social media presence of these journals on Facebook and Twitter. Relevant metrics and content relating to the journals' social media accounts were also crawled for data analysis. From our results, the social media presence of scholarly journals lies between 7.1% and 14.2% across disciplines; and it has shown a steady increase in the last decade. The popularity of scholarly journals on social media is distinct across disciplines. Further, we investigated whether social media metrics of journals can predict the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). We found that the number of followers and disciplines have significant effects on the JIF. In addition, a word co-occurrence network analysis was also conducted to identify popular topics discussed by scholarly journals on social media platforms. Finally, we highlight challenges and issues faced in this study and discuss future research directions.
-
Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015)
0.01
0.0052947453 = product of:
0.015884236 = sum of:
0.015884236 = product of:
0.047652703 = sum of:
0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047652703 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 6.2016 10:29:10
-
Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017)
0.01
0.005247115 = product of:
0.015741345 = sum of:
0.015741345 = product of:
0.047224034 = sum of:
0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047224034 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.10.2017 15:48:22
-
Ergül, A.; Böhm, A.; Schmidt, E.; Hissen, S.; Sariklis, T.: Erfolgsfaktoren für die Durchsetzung von PDF/A als weltweiter Standard für elektronische Langzeitarchivierung (2012)
0.00
0.0046329014 = product of:
0.013898704 = sum of:
0.013898704 = product of:
0.041696113 = sum of:
0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041696113 = score(doc=4794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 1.2013 18:29:53
-
Beinert, T.; Schoger, A.: Vernachlässigte Pflicht oder Sammlung aus Leidenschaft? : Zum Stand der Webarchivierung in deutschen Bibliotheken (2015)
0.00
0.0046329014 = product of:
0.013898704 = sum of:
0.013898704 = product of:
0.041696113 = sum of:
0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041696113 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 1.2016 9:45:29
-
Gutknecht, C.: Zahlungen der ETH Zürich an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley nun öffentlich (2015)
0.00
0.0046329014 = product of:
0.013898704 = sum of:
0.013898704 = product of:
0.041696113 = sum of:
0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041696113 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http://wisspub.net/2015/08/29/zahlungen-der-eth-zuerich-an-elsevier-springer-und-wiley-nun-oeffentlich/
-
Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019)
0.00
0.004591226 = product of:
0.013773678 = sum of:
0.013773678 = product of:
0.04132103 = sum of:
0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132103 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.00
0.004591226 = product of:
0.013773678 = sum of:
0.013773678 = product of:
0.04132103 = sum of:
0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132103 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018)
0.00
0.004591226 = product of:
0.013773678 = sum of:
0.013773678 = product of:
0.04132103 = sum of:
0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132103 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 9.2018 12:22:52
-
Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019)
0.00
0.0039353366 = product of:
0.011806009 = sum of:
0.011806009 = product of:
0.035418026 = sum of:
0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035418026 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
-
Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019)
0.00
0.0039353366 = product of:
0.011806009 = sum of:
0.011806009 = product of:
0.035418026 = sum of:
0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035418026 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 1.2020 13:22:34
-
Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010)
0.00
0.003309216 = product of:
0.009927647 = sum of:
0.009927647 = product of:
0.029782942 = sum of:
0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782942 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 8.2010 12:35:08
-
Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: Publication fees in open access publishing : sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2012)
0.00
0.003309216 = product of:
0.009927647 = sum of:
0.009927647 = product of:
0.029782942 = sum of:
0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782942 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 4.2013 18:29:36
