Search (81 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014) 0.04
    0.04238963 = product of:
      0.1271689 = sum of:
        0.1271689 = product of:
          0.19075334 = sum of:
            0.14943232 = weight(_text_:network in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14943232 = score(doc=2599,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.77015346 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
            0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04132103 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Runcie, R.: Collaborative cataloging within a centralized network : the case of the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus (2013) 0.03
    0.025943888 = product of:
      0.07783166 = sum of:
        0.07783166 = product of:
          0.11674749 = sum of:
            0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 1941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081007965 = score(doc=1941,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 1941, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1941)
            0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 1941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035739526 = score(doc=1941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1941)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Efforts at networking and cooperation have flourished for some time at the University of the West Indies (UWI), a regional institution in the English-speaking Caribbean. Due to their common mission and shared goals, libraries within the system have collaborated on projects to enhance the services provided to their clients. In its attempt at collaboration, the Mona Campus established the UWI Mona Information Network, the primary goal of which is the creation of a campus-wide online catalog with member libraries having access to a larger pool of resources. Most of the departmental libraries within the system have struggled with their inability to adequately acquire and provide access to their collections. To this end some of these libraries have collaborated with the UWI Library to have their holdings added to the online public access catalog (OPAC). This article presents an overview of the collaborative efforts of the UWI Mona Libraries.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 12:04:07
  3. Wisser, K.: ¬The errors of our ways : using metadata quality research to understand common error patterns in the application of name headings (2014) 0.02
    0.020671291 = product of:
      0.062013872 = sum of:
        0.062013872 = product of:
          0.093020804 = sum of:
            0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057281278 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
            0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035739526 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Using data culled during a metadata quality research project for the Social Network and Archival Context (SNAC) project, this article discusses common errors and problems in the use of standardized languages, specifically unambiguous names for persons and corporate bodies. Errors such as misspelling, qualifiers, format, and miss-encoding point to several areas where quality control measures can improve aggregation of data. Results from a large data set indicate that there are predictable problems that can be retrospectively corrected before aggregation. This research looked specifically at name formation and expression in metadata records, but the errors detected could be extended to other controlled vocabularies as well.
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  4. Miller, E.; Ogbuji, U.: Linked data design for the visible library (2015) 0.02
    0.020671291 = product of:
      0.062013872 = sum of:
        0.062013872 = product of:
          0.093020804 = sum of:
            0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057281278 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
            0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035739526 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In response to libraries' frustration over their rich resources being invisible on the web, Zepheira, at the request of the Library of Congress, created BIBFRAME, a bibliographic metadata framework for cataloging. The model replaces MARC records with linked data, promoting resource visibility through a rich network of links. In place of formal taxonomies, a small but extensible vocabulary streamlines metadata efforts. Rather than using a unique bibliographic record to describe one item, BIBFRAME draws on the Dublin Core and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to generate formalized descriptions of Work, Instance, Authority and Annotation as well as associations between items. Zepheira trains librarians to transform MARC records to BIBFRAME resources and adapt the vocabulary for specialized needs, while subject matter experts and technical experts manage content, site design and usability. With a different approach toward data modeling and metadata, previously invisible resources gain visibility through linking.
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.23-29
  5. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.02
    0.018448254 = product of:
      0.05534476 = sum of:
        0.05534476 = product of:
          0.08301714 = sum of:
            0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041696113 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
            0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04132103 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  6. Dempsey, L.: Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue : scale, workflow, attention (2013) 0.01
    0.007500738 = product of:
      0.022502214 = sum of:
        0.022502214 = product of:
          0.06750664 = sum of:
            0.06750664 = weight(_text_:network in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06750664 = score(doc=1483,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    There is a renaissance of interest in the catalog and catalog data. Yet it comes at a time when the catalog itself is being reconfigured in ways which may result in its disappearance as an individually identifiable component of library service. It is being subsumed within larger library discovery environments and catalog data is flowing into other systems and services. This article discusses the position of the catalog and uses it to illustrate more general discovery and workflow directions. The context of information use and creation has changed as it transitions from a world of physical distribution to one of digital distribution. In parallel, our focus shifts from the local (the library or the bookstore or ...) to the network as a whole. We turn to Google, or to Amazon, or to Expedia, or to the BBC. Think of two trends in a network environment, which I term here the attention switch and the workflow switch. Each has implications for the catalog, as it pushes the potential catalog user in other directions. Each also potentially recasts the role of the catalog in the overall information value chain.
  7. Calhoun, K.: Supporting digital scholarship : bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories (2013) 0.01
    0.007425352 = product of:
      0.022276055 = sum of:
        0.022276055 = product of:
          0.06682816 = sum of:
            0.06682816 = weight(_text_:network in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06682816 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries have entered an era of discontinuous change-a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. Bibliographic control, cooperative cataloguing systems and library catalogues have been key assets in the research library service framework for supporting scholarship. This chapter examines these assets in the context of changing library collections, new metadata sources and methods, open access repositories, digital scholarship and the purposes of research libraries. Advocating a fundamental rethinking of the research library service framework, the chapter concludes with a call for research libraries to collectively consider new approaches that could strengthen their roles as essential contributors to emergent, network-level scholarly research infrastructures.
  8. Flynn, E.A.; Kilkenny, E.: Cataloging from the center : improving e-Book cataloging on a consortial level (2017) 0.01
    0.007425352 = product of:
      0.022276055 = sum of:
        0.022276055 = product of:
          0.06682816 = sum of:
            0.06682816 = weight(_text_:network in 5147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06682816 = score(doc=5147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 5147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5147)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 2014, the Ohio Library and Information Network (OhioLINK) overhauled its consortial cataloging workflows by switching to what has been termed a model of "cataloging from the center." For more than 20 years, the Ohio academic library consortium relied on volunteers from its member institutions to catalog consortially purchased materials. Consolidating the consortial cataloging into the OhioLINK office allowed for revising the various workflows. Since 2014, the cataloging workflows for these shared electronic resources have improved efficiencies, allowing records to be provided to members in a more timely manner.
  9. Kim, J.; Diesner, J.: Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks (2016) 0.01
    0.0053038225 = product of:
      0.015911467 = sum of:
        0.015911467 = product of:
          0.047734402 = sum of:
            0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047734402 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars have often relied on name initials to resolve name ambiguities in large-scale coauthorship network research. This approach bears the risk of incorrectly merging or splitting author identities. The use of initial-based disambiguation has been justified by the assumption that such errors would not affect research findings too much. This paper tests that assumption by analyzing coauthorship networks from five academic fields-biology, computer science, nanoscience, neuroscience, and physics-and an interdisciplinary journal, PNAS. Name instances in data sets of this study were disambiguated based on heuristics gained from previous algorithmic disambiguation solutions. We use disambiguated data as a proxy of ground-truth to test the performance of three types of initial-based disambiguation. Our results show that initial-based disambiguation can misrepresent statistical properties of coauthorship networks: It deflates the number of unique authors, number of components, average shortest paths, clustering coefficient, and assortativity, while it inflates average productivity, density, average coauthor number per author, and largest component size. Also, on average, more than half of top 10 productive or collaborative authors drop off the lists. Asian names were found to account for the majority of misidentification by initial-based disambiguation due to their common surname and given name initials.
  10. Buttò, S.: RDA: analyses, considerations and activities by the Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) (2016) 0.01
    0.0053038225 = product of:
      0.015911467 = sum of:
        0.015911467 = product of:
          0.047734402 = sum of:
            0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047734402 = score(doc=2958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The report aims to analyze the applicability of the Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the Italian public libraries, and also in the archives and museums in order to contribute to the discussion at international level. The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian libraries (ICCU) manages the online catalogue of the Italian libraries and the network of bibliographic services. ICCU has the institutional task of coordinating the cataloging and the documentation activities for the Italian libraries. On March 31 st 2014, the Institute signed the Agreement with the American Library Association,Publishing ALA, for the Italian translation rights of RDA, now available and published inRDAToolkit. The Italian translation has been carried out and realized by the Technical Working Group, made up of the main national and academic libraries, cultural Institutions and bibliographic agencies. The Group started working from the need of studying the new code in its textual detail, to better understand the principles, purposes, and applicability and finally its sustainability within the national context in relation to the area of the bibliographic control. At international level, starting from the publication of the Italian version of RDA and through the research carried out by ICCU and by the national Working Groups, the purpose is a more direct comparison with the experiences of the other European countries, also within EURIG international context, for an exchange of experiences aimed at strengthening the informational content of the data cataloging, with respect to history, cultural traditions and national identities of the different countries.
  11. Beall, J.: Abbreviations, full spellings, and searchers' preferences (2011) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 4166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=4166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4166)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:29:49
  12. Richert, N.: Authors in the Mathematical Reviews/MathSciNet database (2011) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=1895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:29:24
  13. Niu, J.: Evolving landscape in name authority control (2013) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 13:20:17
  14. Taniguchi, S.: Understanding RDA as a DC application profile (2013) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:05:09
  15. Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:13:13
  16. Bauer, B.; Lackner, M.; Schubert, B.: ¬Der Österreichische Bibliothekenverbund im Umbruch : neues Bibliotheksverwaltungssystem Alma als Impuls für die Zukunft (2018) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2019 18:29:28
  17. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬The new FRBR-LRM model : some accents (2016) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  18. Franca, A.S.; Silveira, N.C.: ¬The bibliographic representation of authorship of autochthonous communities (2016) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 4948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=4948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4948)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  19. Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012) 0.01
    0.005247115 = product of:
      0.015741345 = sum of:
        0.015741345 = product of:
          0.047224034 = sum of:
            0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047224034 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:13:52
  20. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.01
    0.005247115 = product of:
      0.015741345 = sum of:
        0.015741345 = product of:
          0.047224034 = sum of:
            0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047224034 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22

Languages

  • e 75
  • d 5
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 74
  • el 5
  • m 5
  • b 4
  • r 2
  • More… Less…