Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mining the metadata quarries : Special section (2003) 0.03 
    0.027561722 = product of:
  0.082685165 = sum of:
    0.082685165 = product of:
      0.124027744 = sum of:
        0.076375045 = weight(_text_:network in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076375045 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
        0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047652703 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Einleitung zu den Beiträgen: GUENTHER, R. et al.: New metadata standards for digital resources: MODS and METS; GREENBERG, J.: Metadata generation: processes, people and tools; TENNIS, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability: Dublin Core audience element; JUN, W.: A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurs and metadata in a digital library
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.11-28
  2. Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008) 0.03 
    0.025872445 = product of:
  0.07761733 = sum of:
    0.07761733 = product of:
      0.11642599 = sum of:
        0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081007965 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
        0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035418026 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper describes metadata development of an application profile for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Achievement Standards Network (ASN) in the United States. The ASN is a national repository of machine-readable achievement standards modeled in RDF that shape teaching and learning in the various states. We describe the nature of the ASN metadata and the various uses to which that metadata is applied including the alignment of the standards of one state to those of another and the correlation of those standards to educational resources in support of resource discovery and retrieval.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003) 0.02 
    0.02226698 = product of:
  0.06680094 = sum of:
    0.06680094 = product of:
      0.1002014 = sum of:
        0.076375045 = weight(_text_:network in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076375045 = score(doc=1254,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
        0.023826351 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023826351 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
  4. Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005) 0.02 
    0.020671291 = product of:
  0.062013872 = sum of:
    0.062013872 = product of:
      0.093020804 = sum of:
        0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057281278 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
        0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035739526 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:11:46
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003) 0.02 
    0.017226078 = product of:
  0.051678233 = sum of:
    0.051678233 = product of:
      0.077517346 = sum of:
        0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047734402 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
        0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029782942 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the assumptions, process and results of a pilot study of issues of interoperability among a set of seven existing controlled vocabulary schemes that make statements about the audience of an educational resource. The notion of audience for the study was defined in terms of the semantics of the Dublin Core metadata element of the same name: "A category of user for whom the resource is intended." The study used a data collection technique, card sorting, to see how nonexpert users sorted terms in the seven vocabularies into relationships and what their thought processes were in sorting these terms. The need for controlled vocabulary interoperability is a pressing concern for the education community as well as many others. In particular, the current study was informed by the need of the Dublin Core Education Working Group (www.dublin core.org/groups/education/) to explore the possibility of a high-level switching language in an application profile for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) audience element. An abundance of educational resources exists, many of which are available in the networked environment. Yet, theie are various conceptualizations of the domain in the form of different controlled vocabularies that limit access. Controlled vocabulary interoperability would allow these different conceptualizations to remain intact, thereby serving local needs while allowing users to navigate across collections and exploiting the intellectual network of resources available.
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.20-23
  6. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.02 
    0.015092259 = product of:
  0.045276776 = sum of:
    0.045276776 = product of:
      0.067915164 = sum of:
        0.047254648 = weight(_text_:network in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047254648 = score(doc=2668,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.24354391 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
        0.020660516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020660516 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
  7. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.01 
    0.01049423 = product of:
  0.03148269 = sum of:
    0.03148269 = product of:
      0.09444807 = sum of:
        0.09444807 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09444807 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.01049423 = product of:
  0.03148269 = sum of:
    0.03148269 = product of:
      0.09444807 = sum of:
        0.09444807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09444807 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  9. Granger, S.: Metadata and digital preservation : a plea for cross-interest collaboration (2000) 0.01 
    0.009265803 = product of:
  0.027797408 = sum of:
    0.027797408 = product of:
      0.083392225 = sum of:
        0.083392225 = weight(_text_:29 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083392225 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Vine. 2000, no.117, S.24-29
  10. Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloguing in Thai libraries (2000) 0.01 
    0.009265803 = product of:
  0.027797408 = sum of:
    0.027797408 = product of:
      0.083392225 = sum of:
        0.083392225 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083392225 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35
  11. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.01 
    0.009182452 = product of:
  0.027547356 = sum of:
    0.027547356 = product of:
      0.08264206 = sum of:
        0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08264206 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.009182452 = product of:
  0.027547356 = sum of:
    0.027547356 = product of:
      0.08264206 = sum of:
        0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08264206 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.009182452 = product of:
  0.027547356 = sum of:
    0.027547356 = product of:
      0.08264206 = sum of:
        0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08264206 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  14. Hert, C.A.; Denn, S.O.; Gillman, D.W.; Oh, J.S.; Pattuelli, M.C.; Hernandez, N.: Investigating and modeling metadata use to support information architecture development in the statistical knowledge network (2007) 0.01 
    0.009000885 = product of:
  0.027002655 = sum of:
    0.027002655 = product of:
      0.081007965 = sum of:
        0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081007965 = score(doc=422,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.
  15. Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002) 0.01 
    0.007942118 = product of:
  0.023826351 = sum of:
    0.023826351 = product of:
      0.07147905 = sum of:
        0.07147905 = weight(_text_:29 in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07147905 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.234-235
  16. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.007870673 = product of:
  0.023612019 = sum of:
    0.023612019 = product of:
      0.07083605 = sum of:
        0.07083605 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07083605 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  17. Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources (2003) 0.01 
    0.007500738 = product of:
  0.022502214 = sum of:
    0.022502214 = product of:
      0.06750664 = sum of:
        0.06750664 = weight(_text_:network in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06750664 = score(doc=3083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Authority control is a quite recent term in the long history of cataloguing, although the underlying principle is among the very early principles of bibliographic control. Bibliographic control is a Field in transformation by the rapid expansion of the WWW, which has brought new problems to infonnation discovery and retrieval, creating new challenges and requirements in information management. In a comprehensive approach, authority control is presented as one of the most promising library activities in this respect. The evolution of work methods and standards for the sharing of authority files is reviewed, showing the imbalance in developments and practical achievements between name and subject authority, in an international perspective. The need to improve the network availability and usability of authority information assets in more effective and holistic ways is underlyned; and a new philosophy and scope is proposed for library authority work, based an the primacy of the linking function of authority data, and by expanding the finding, relating and informing functions of authority records. Some of these aspects are being addressed in several projects dealing with knowledge organization systems, notably to cope with multilingual needs and to enable semantic interoperability among different systems. Library practice itself should evolve in the same direction, thereby providing practical experience to inform new or improved principles and standards for authority work, while contributing to enhance local information services and to promote their involvement in the WWW environment.
  18. Schottlaender, B.E.C.: Why metadata? Why now? Why me? (2003) 0.01 
    0.0074879 = product of:
  0.0224637 = sum of:
    0.0224637 = product of:
      0.0673911 = sum of:
        0.0673911 = weight(_text_:29 in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0673911 = score(doc=5513,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:34:29
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.19-29
  19. Rusch-Feja, D.: Dublin Core Educational Metadata : Entwicklungen bei Metadaten für den Bildungsbereich (2000) 0.01 
    0.007425352 = product of:
  0.022276055 = sum of:
    0.022276055 = product of:
      0.06682816 = sum of:
        0.06682816 = weight(_text_:network in 4451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06682816 = score(doc=4451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 4451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4451)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    August 1999 wurde eine Arbeitsgruppe für bildungsbezogene Metadaten im Rahmen der Dublin Core Metadaten-Initiative unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Stuart Sutton (Gateway for Educational Materials, GEM, und School of Libraray and Information Science der University of Washington, USA und Dr. Jon Mason, Direktor des Education Network Australia, EdNA, Australien) konstituiert. Innerhalb einer Woche nach der Presseankündigung hatten sich weltweit über 70 Teilnehmer für die Arbeitsgruppe gemeldet. Ziele dieser Arbeitsgruppe sind: ... die Eingrenzungen und Erweiterungen zum Dublin Core Metadatensatz zu entwickeln, der Bildungsinformationen zum Zwecke einer besseren Quellensuche beschreibt. Es ist zu erwarten, daß die daraus resultierenden Metadaten sowohl bildungsbezogene Qualifier innerhalb des Rahmens der bestehenden Dublin Core Elemente beinhalten als auch potentiell einige, die für den Bibldungsbereich spezifisch sind
  20. Dekkers, M.; Weibel, S.L.: State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative April 2003 (2003) 0.01 
    0.007425352 = product of:
  0.022276055 = sum of:
    0.022276055 = product of:
      0.06682816 = sum of:
        0.06682816 = weight(_text_:network in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06682816 = score(doc=2795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative continues to grow in participation and recognition as the predominant resource discovery metadata standard on the Internet. With its approval as ISO 15836, DC is firmly established as a foundation block of modular, interoperable metadata for distributed resources. This report summarizes developments in DCMI over the past year, including the annual conference, progress of working groups, new developments in encoding methods, and advances in documentation and dissemination. New developments in broadening the community to commercial users of metadata are discussed, and plans for an international network of national affiliates are described.

Authors

Languages

  • e 88
  • d 11

Types

  • a 92
  • el 5
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications