Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × author_ss:"Riesthuis, G.J.A."
  1. Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002) 0.02
    0.020671291 = product of:
      0.062013872 = sum of:
        0.062013872 = product of:
          0.093020804 = sum of:
            0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057281278 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
            0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035739526 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.78-86
  2. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.01
    0.009182452 = product of:
      0.027547356 = sum of:
        0.027547356 = product of:
          0.08264206 = sum of:
            0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08264206 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
  3. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.00
    0.0026473727 = product of:
      0.007942118 = sum of:
        0.007942118 = product of:
          0.023826351 = sum of:
            0.023826351 = weight(_text_:29 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023826351 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 13:47:31