-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.02
0.01581279 = product of:
0.04743837 = sum of:
0.04743837 = product of:
0.07115755 = sum of:
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035418026 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.02
0.0153776 = product of:
0.0461328 = sum of:
0.0461328 = product of:
0.1383984 = sum of:
0.1383984 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1383984 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36937886 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Guns, R.: Tracing the origins of the semantic web (2013)
0.01
0.007500738 = product of:
0.022502214 = sum of:
0.022502214 = product of:
0.06750664 = sum of:
0.06750664 = weight(_text_:network in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06750664 = score(doc=1093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web has been criticized for not being semantic. This article examines the questions of why and how the Web of Data, expressed in the Resource Description Framework (RDF), has come to be known as the Semantic Web. Contrary to previous papers, we deliberately take a descriptive stance and do not start from preconceived ideas about the nature of semantics. Instead, we mainly base our analysis on early design documents of the (Semantic) Web. The main determining factor is shown to be link typing, coupled with the influence of online metadata. Both factors already were present in early web standards and drafts. Our findings indicate that the Semantic Web is directly linked to older artificial intelligence work, despite occasional claims to the contrary. Because of link typing, the Semantic Web can be considered an example of a semantic network. Originally network representations of the meaning of natural language utterances, semantic networks have eventually come to refer to any networks with typed (usually directed) links. We discuss possible causes for this shift and suggest that it may be due to confounding paradigmatic and syntagmatic semantic relations.
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.005247115 = product of:
0.015741345 = sum of:
0.015741345 = product of:
0.047224034 = sum of:
0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047224034 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.005247115 = product of:
0.015741345 = sum of:
0.015741345 = product of:
0.047224034 = sum of:
0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047224034 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (2008)
0.00
0.0046329014 = product of:
0.013898704 = sum of:
0.013898704 = product of:
0.041696113 = sum of:
0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041696113 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 14:29:06
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.00
0.004591226 = product of:
0.013773678 = sum of:
0.013773678 = product of:
0.04132103 = sum of:
0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132103 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.; Sigel, A.: Introducing terminology-based ontologies : Papers and Materials presented by the authors at the workshop "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" (Poli/Schmitz-Esser/Sigel) at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), Vienna, Austria, July 6th, 2006 (2006)
0.00
0.003971059 = product of:
0.011913176 = sum of:
0.011913176 = product of:
0.035739526 = sum of:
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 7.2006 12:29:55
-
Hüsken, P.: Informationssuche im Semantic Web : Methoden des Information Retrieval für die Wissensrepräsentation (2006)
0.00
0.003971059 = product of:
0.011913176 = sum of:
0.011913176 = product of:
0.035739526 = sum of:
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 4332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=4332,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4332, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4332)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:29:27
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
0.003971059 = product of:
0.011913176 = sum of:
0.011913176 = product of:
0.035739526 = sum of:
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005)
0.00
0.003971059 = product of:
0.011913176 = sum of:
0.011913176 = product of:
0.035739526 = sum of:
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.00
0.0039353366 = product of:
0.011806009 = sum of:
0.011806009 = product of:
0.035418026 = sum of:
0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035418026 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015)
0.00
0.0039353366 = product of:
0.011806009 = sum of:
0.011806009 = product of:
0.035418026 = sum of:
0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035418026 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
-
Jacobs, I.: From chaos, order: W3C standard helps organize knowledge : SKOS Connects Diverse Knowledge Organization Systems to Linked Data (2009)
0.00
0.003712676 = product of:
0.0111380275 = sum of:
0.0111380275 = product of:
0.03341408 = sum of:
0.03341408 = weight(_text_:network in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03341408 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.17221154 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- SKOS Adapts to the Diversity of Knowledge Organization Systems A useful starting point for understanding the role of SKOS is the set of subject headings published by the US Library of Congress (LOC) for categorizing books, videos, and other library resources. These headings can be used to broaden or narrow queries for discovering resources. For instance, one can narrow a query about books on "Chinese literature" to "Chinese drama," or further still to "Chinese children's plays." Library of Congress subject headings have evolved within a community of practice over a period of decades. By now publishing these subject headings in SKOS, the Library of Congress has made them available to the linked data community, which benefits from a time-tested set of concepts to re-use in their own data. This re-use adds value ("the network effect") to the collection. When people all over the Web re-use the same LOC concept for "Chinese drama," or a concept from some other vocabulary linked to it, this creates many new routes to the discovery of information, and increases the chances that relevant items will be found. As an example of mapping one vocabulary to another, a combined effort from the STITCH, TELplus and MACS Projects provides links between LOC concepts and RAMEAU, a collection of French subject headings used by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France and other institutions. SKOS can be used for subject headings but also many other approaches to organizing knowledge. Because different communities are comfortable with different organization schemes, SKOS is designed to port diverse knowledge organization systems to the Web. "Active participation from the library and information science community in the development of SKOS over the past seven years has been key to ensuring that SKOS meets a variety of needs," said Thomas Baker, co-chair of the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, which published SKOS. "One goal in creating SKOS was to provide new uses for well-established knowledge organization systems by providing a bridge to the linked data cloud." SKOS is part of the Semantic Web technology stack. Like the Web Ontology Language (OWL), SKOS can be used to define vocabularies. But the two technologies were designed to meet different needs. SKOS is a simple language with just a few features, tuned for sharing and linking knowledge organization systems such as thesauri and classification schemes. OWL offers a general and powerful framework for knowledge representation, where additional "rigor" can afford additional benefits (for instance, business rule processing). To get started with SKOS, see the SKOS Primer.
-
Davies, J.; Duke, A.; Stonkus, A.: OntoShare: evolving ontologies in a knowledge sharing system (2004)
0.00
0.003712676 = product of:
0.0111380275 = sum of:
0.0111380275 = product of:
0.03341408 = sum of:
0.03341408 = weight(_text_:network in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03341408 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.17221154 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We saw in the introduction how the Semantic Web makes possible a new generation of knowledge management tools. We now turn our attention more specifically to Semantic Web based support for virtual communities of practice. The notion of communities of practice has attracted much attention in the field of knowledge management. Communities of practice are groups within (or sometimes across) organizations who share a common set of information needs or problems. They are typically not a formal organizational unit but an informal network, each sharing in part a common agenda and shared interests or issues. In one example it was found that a lot of knowledge sharing among copier engineers took place through informal exchanges, often around a water cooler. As well as local, geographically based communities, trends towards flexible working and globalisation have led to interest in supporting dispersed communities using Internet technology. The challenge for organizations is to support such communities and make them effective. Provided with an ontology meeting the needs of a particular community of practice, knowledge management tools can arrange knowledge assets into the predefined conceptual classes of the ontology, allowing more natural and intuitive access to knowledge. Knowledge management tools must give users the ability to organize information into a controllable asset. Building an intranet-based store of information is not sufficient for knowledge management; the relationships within the stored information are vital. These relationships cover such diverse issues as relative importance, context, sequence, significance, causality and association. The potential for knowledge management tools is vast; not only can they make better use of the raw information already available, but they can sift, abstract and help to share new information, and present it to users in new and compelling ways.
-
Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008)
0.00
0.0037102709 = product of:
0.011130813 = sum of:
0.011130813 = product of:
0.033392437 = sum of:
0.033392437 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033392437 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003)
0.00
0.003309216 = product of:
0.009927647 = sum of:
0.009927647 = product of:
0.029782942 = sum of:
0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782942 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
-
Soergel, D.: SemWeb: Proposal for an Open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology : exploration and development of the concept (1996)
0.00
0.003309216 = product of:
0.009927647 = sum of:
0.009927647 = product of:
0.029782942 = sum of:
0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782942 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 15. 6.2010 19:25:29
-
¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part 2. (2010)
0.00
0.003309216 = product of:
0.009927647 = sum of:
0.009927647 = product of:
0.029782942 = sum of:
0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782942 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.00
0.003279447 = product of:
0.009838341 = sum of:
0.009838341 = product of:
0.029515022 = sum of:
0.029515022 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029515022 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
