Search (167 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.03
    0.0307552 = product of:
      0.0922656 = sum of:
        0.0922656 = product of:
          0.2767968 = sum of:
            0.2767968 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2767968 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36937886 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Franke, F.: ¬Das Framework for Information Literacy : neue Impulse für die Förderung von Informationskompetenz in Deutschland?! (2017) 0.02
    0.021626826 = product of:
      0.064880475 = sum of:
        0.064880475 = product of:
          0.097320706 = sum of:
            0.06190268 = weight(_text_:29 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06190268 = score(doc=2248,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.40390027 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
            0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035418026 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2017H4S22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H4S22-29.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.22-29
  3. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.02
    0.02108372 = product of:
      0.06325116 = sum of:
        0.06325116 = product of:
          0.09487674 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
            0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047224034 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46
  4. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.02
    0.01581279 = product of:
      0.04743837 = sum of:
        0.04743837 = product of:
          0.07115755 = sum of:
            0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035739526 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
            0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035418026 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  5. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.01
    0.014994848 = product of:
      0.04498454 = sum of:
        0.04498454 = product of:
          0.06747681 = sum of:
            0.04960705 = weight(_text_:network in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04960705 = score(doc=1195,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.25566787 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
            0.017869763 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017869763 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  6. Xu, G.; Cao, Y.; Ren, Y.; Li, X.; Feng, Z.: Network security situation awareness based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules for Internet of Things (2017) 0.01
    0.014032597 = product of:
      0.04209779 = sum of:
        0.04209779 = product of:
          0.12629336 = sum of:
            0.12629336 = weight(_text_:network in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12629336 = score(doc=306,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.6508985 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Internet of Things (IoT) brings the third development wave of the global information industry which makes users, network and perception devices cooperate more closely. However, if IoT has security problems, it may cause a variety of damage and even threaten human lives and properties. To improve the abilities of monitoring, providing emergency response and predicting the development trend of IoT security, a new paradigm called network security situation awareness (NSSA) is proposed. However, it is limited by its ability to mine and evaluate security situation elements from multi-source heterogeneous network security information. To solve this problem, this paper proposes an IoT network security situation awareness model using situation reasoning method based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules. Ontology technology can provide a unified and formalized description to solve the problem of semantic heterogeneity in the IoT security domain. In this paper, four key sub-domains are proposed to reflect an IoT security situation: context, attack, vulnerability and network flow. Further, user-defined rules can compensate for the limited description ability of ontology, and hence can enhance the reasoning ability of our proposed ontology model. The examples in real IoT scenarios show that the ability of the network security situation awareness that adopts our situation reasoning method is more comprehensive and more powerful reasoning abilities than the traditional NSSA methods. [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7999187/]
  7. Leskinen, P.; Hyvönen, E.: Extracting genealogical networks of linked data from biographical texts (2019) 0.01
    0.012861087 = product of:
      0.03858326 = sum of:
        0.03858326 = product of:
          0.11574978 = sum of:
            0.11574978 = weight(_text_:network in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11574978 = score(doc=5798,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.59655833 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the idea and our work of extracting and reassembling a genealogical network automatically from a collection of biographies. The network can be used as a tool for network analysis of historical persons. The data has been published as Linked Data and as an interactive online service as part of the in-use data service and semantic portal BiographySampo - Finnish Biographies on the Semantic Web.
  8. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01
    0.01146346 = product of:
      0.03439038 = sum of:
        0.03439038 = product of:
          0.10317113 = sum of:
            0.10317113 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10317113 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  9. Mao, J.; Xu, W.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuille, A.L.: Explain images with multimodal recurrent neural networks (2014) 0.01
    0.01102379 = product of:
      0.03307137 = sum of:
        0.03307137 = product of:
          0.0992141 = sum of:
            0.0992141 = weight(_text_:network in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0992141 = score(doc=1557,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.51133573 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a multimodal Recurrent Neural Network (m-RNN) model for generating novel sentence descriptions to explain the content of images. It directly models the probability distribution of generating a word given previous words and the image. Image descriptions are generated by sampling from this distribution. The model consists of two sub-networks: a deep recurrent neural network for sentences and a deep convolutional network for images. These two sub-networks interact with each other in a multimodal layer to form the whole m-RNN model. The effectiveness of our model is validated on three benchmark datasets (IAPR TC-12 [8], Flickr 8K [28], and Flickr 30K [13]). Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art generative method. In addition, the m-RNN model can be applied to retrieval tasks for retrieving images or sentences, and achieves significant performance improvement over the state-of-the-art methods which directly optimize the ranking objective function for retrieval.
  10. Momeni, F.; Mayr, P.: Analyzing the research output presented at European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems workshops (2000-2015) (2016) 0.01
    0.010607645 = product of:
      0.031822935 = sum of:
        0.031822935 = product of:
          0.095468804 = sum of:
            0.095468804 = weight(_text_:network in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095468804 = score(doc=3106,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.492033 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.
  11. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.01
    0.010299923 = product of:
      0.030899769 = sum of:
        0.030899769 = product of:
          0.046349652 = sum of:
            0.028640639 = weight(_text_:network in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028640639 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.14760989 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
            0.017709013 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017709013 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
    Dr Howe and his colleagues do, however, believe that the study of diagrams can result in new insights. A figure showing new metabolic pathways in a cell, for example, may summarise hundreds of experiments. Since illustrations can convey important scientific concepts in this way, they think that browsing through related figures from different papers may help researchers come up with new theories. As Dr Howe puts it, "the unit of scientific currency is closer to the figure than to the paper." With this thought in mind, the team have created a website (viziometrics.org (http://viziometrics.org/) ) where the millions of images sorted by their program can be searched using key words. Their next plan is to extract the information from particular types of scientific figure, to create comprehensive "super" figures: a giant network of all the known chemical processes in a cell for example, or the best-available tree of life. At just one such superfigure per paper, though, the citation records of articles containing such all-embracing diagrams may very well undermine the correlation that prompted their creation in the first place. Call it the ultimate marriage of chart and science.
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.009275677 = product of:
      0.02782703 = sum of:
        0.02782703 = product of:
          0.08348109 = sum of:
            0.08348109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08348109 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  13. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01
    0.009275677 = product of:
      0.02782703 = sum of:
        0.02782703 = product of:
          0.08348109 = sum of:
            0.08348109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08348109 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  14. Kirriemuir, J.; Brickley, D.; Welsh, S.; Knight, J.; Hamilton, M.: Cross-searching subject gateways : the query routing and forward knowledge approach (1998) 0.01
    0.00918649 = product of:
      0.02755947 = sum of:
        0.02755947 = product of:
          0.08267841 = sum of:
            0.08267841 = weight(_text_:network in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08267841 = score(doc=1252,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A subject gateway, in the context of network-based resource access, can be defined as some facility that allows easier access to network-based resources in a defined subject area. The simplest types of subject gateways are sets of Web pages containing lists of links to resources. Some gateways index their lists of links and provide a simple search facility. More advanced gateways offer a much enhanced service via a system consisting of a resource database and various indexes, which can be searched and/or browsed through a Web-based interface. Each entry in the database contains information about a network-based resource, such as a Web page, Web site, mailing list or document. Entries are usually created by a cataloguer manually identifying a suitable resource, describing the resource using a template, and submitting the template to the database for indexing. Subject gateways are also known as subject-based information gateways (SBIGs), subject-based gateways, subject index gateways, virtual libraries, clearing houses, subject trees, pathfinders and other variations thereof. This paper describes the characteristics of some of the subject gateways currently accessible through the Web, and compares them to automatic "vacuum cleaner" type search engines, such as AltaVista. The application of WHOIS++, centroids, query routing, and forward knowledge to searching several of these subject gateways simultaneously is outlined. The paper concludes with looking at some of the issues facing subject gateway development in the near future. The paper touches on many of the issues mentioned in a previous paper in D-Lib Magazine, especially regarding resource-discovery related initiatives and services.
  15. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.01
    0.009182452 = product of:
      0.027547356 = sum of:
        0.027547356 = product of:
          0.08264206 = sum of:
            0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08264206 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  16. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01
    0.009170768 = product of:
      0.027512303 = sum of:
        0.027512303 = product of:
          0.082536906 = sum of:
            0.082536906 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082536906 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].
  17. Fowler, R.H.; Wilson, B.A.; Fowler, W.A.L.: Information navigator : an information system using associative networks for display and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.009000885 = product of:
      0.027002655 = sum of:
        0.027002655 = product of:
          0.081007965 = sum of:
            0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081007965 = score(doc=919,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Document retrieval is a highly interactive process dealing with large amounts of information. Visual representations can provide both a means for managing the complexity of large information structures and an interface style well suited to interactive manipulation. The system we have designed utilizes visually displayed graphic structures and a direct manipulation interface style to supply an integrated environment for retrieval. A common visually displayed network structure is used for query, document content, and term relations. A query can be modified through direct manipulation of its visual form by incorporating terms from any other information structure the system displays. An associative thesaurus of terms and an inter-document network provide information about a document collection that can complement other retrieval aids. Visualization of these large data structures makes use of fisheye views and overview diagrams to help overcome some of the inherent difficulties of orientation and navigation in large information structures.
  18. Gödert, W.: Digitale Euthanasie? (2018) 0.01
    0.007942118 = product of:
      0.023826351 = sum of:
        0.023826351 = product of:
          0.07147905 = sum of:
            0.07147905 = weight(_text_:29 in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147905 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Open Password. 2018, Nr.372 vom 29. Mai 2018 [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=480&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]
  19. Rudner, L.: Who is going to mine digital library resources? : anf how? (2000) 0.01
    0.007942118 = product of:
      0.023826351 = sum of:
        0.023826351 = product of:
          0.07147905 = sum of:
            0.07147905 = weight(_text_:29 in 6800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147905 = score(doc=6800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6800)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 16:38:29
  20. Grandt, J.: Vom Gebrauch der Worte (2017) 0.01
    0.007942118 = product of:
      0.023826351 = sum of:
        0.023826351 = product of:
          0.07147905 = sum of:
            0.07147905 = weight(_text_:29 in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147905 = score(doc=3258,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 2.2017 13:29:03

Years

Languages

  • e 86
  • d 78
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…