Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Calegari, S.; Sanchez, E.: Object-fuzzy concept network : an enrichment of ontologies in semantic information retrieval (2008) 0.03
    0.02783372 = product of:
      0.08350116 = sum of:
        0.08350116 = product of:
          0.12525174 = sum of:
            0.095468804 = weight(_text_:network in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095468804 = score(doc=2393,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.492033 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
            0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029782942 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article shows how a fuzzy ontology-based approach can improve semantic documents retrieval. After formally defining a fuzzy ontology and a fuzzy knowledge base, a special type of new fuzzy relationship called (semantic) correlation, which links the concepts or entities in a fuzzy ontology, is discussed. These correlations, first assigned by experts, are updated after querying or when a document has been inserted into a database. Moreover, in order to define a dynamic knowledge of a domain adapting itself to the context, it is shown how to handle a tradeoff between the correct definition of an object, taken in the ontology structure, and the actual meaning assigned by individuals. The notion of a fuzzy concept network is extended, incorporating database objects so that entities and documents can similarly be represented in the network. Information retrieval (IR) algorithm, using an object-fuzzy concept network (O-FCN), is introduced and described. This algorithm allows us to derive a unique path among the entities involved in the query to obtain maxima semantic associations in the knowledge domain. Finally, the study has been validated by querying a database using fuzzy recall, fuzzy precision, and coefficient variant measures in the crisp and fuzzy cases.
    Date
    9.11.2008 13:07:29
  2. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.02
    0.0153776 = product of:
      0.0461328 = sum of:
        0.0461328 = product of:
          0.1383984 = sum of:
            0.1383984 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1383984 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36937886 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  3. Grzonkowski, S.; Kruk, S.R.; Gzella, A.; Demczuk, J.; McDaniel, B.: Community-aware ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.012001181 = product of:
      0.03600354 = sum of:
        0.03600354 = product of:
          0.10801062 = sum of:
            0.10801062 = weight(_text_:network in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10801062 = score(doc=3382,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.5566718 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The term "social network" was first mentioned in 1954 by J.A. Barnes. The social network is a structure that consists of nodes; the nodes represent individual people or organizations. Such a structure depicts the ways in which people are connected through diverse social familiarities like acquaintance, friendship or close familiar bonds.
  4. Hinkelmann, K.: Ontopia Omnigator : ein Werkzeug zur Einführung in Topic Maps (20xx) 0.01
    0.009265803 = product of:
      0.027797408 = sum of:
        0.027797408 = product of:
          0.083392225 = sum of:
            0.083392225 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083392225 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:29:09
  5. Innovations and advanced techniques in systems, computing sciences and software engineering (2008) 0.01
    0.007500738 = product of:
      0.022502214 = sum of:
        0.022502214 = product of:
          0.06750664 = sum of:
            0.06750664 = weight(_text_:network in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06750664 = score(doc=4319,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    LCSH
    Computer network architectures
    Subject
    Computer network architectures
  6. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.01
    0.007500738 = product of:
      0.022502214 = sum of:
        0.022502214 = product of:
          0.06750664 = sum of:
            0.06750664 = weight(_text_:network in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06750664 = score(doc=2257,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
  7. Griffiths, T.L.; Steyvers, M.: ¬A probabilistic approach to semantic representation (2002) 0.01
    0.0074879 = product of:
      0.0224637 = sum of:
        0.0224637 = product of:
          0.0673911 = sum of:
            0.0673911 = weight(_text_:29 in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0673911 = score(doc=3671,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:55:01
    29. 6.2015 16:09:05
  8. Panzer, M.: Towards the "webification" of controlled subject vocabulary : a case study involving the Dewey Decimal Classification (2007) 0.01
    0.007425352 = product of:
      0.022276055 = sum of:
        0.022276055 = product of:
          0.06682816 = sum of:
            0.06682816 = weight(_text_:network in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06682816 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The presentation will briefly introduce a series of major principles for bringing subject terminology to the network level. A closer look at one KOS in particular, the Dewey Decimal Classification, should help to gain more insight into the perceived difficulties and potential benefits of building taxonomy services out and on top of classic large-scale vocabularies or taxonomies.
  9. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01
    0.006558894 = product of:
      0.019676682 = sum of:
        0.019676682 = product of:
          0.059030045 = sum of:
            0.059030045 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059030045 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  10. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.01
    0.006558894 = product of:
      0.019676682 = sum of:
        0.019676682 = product of:
          0.059030045 = sum of:
            0.059030045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059030045 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  11. Drexel, G.: Knowledge engineering for intelligent information retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.0063645868 = product of:
      0.01909376 = sum of:
        0.01909376 = product of:
          0.057281278 = sum of:
            0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057281278 = score(doc=4043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a clustered approach to designing an overall ontological model together with a general rule-based component that serves as a mapping device. By observational criteria, a multi-lingual team of experts excerpts concepts from general communication in the media. The team, then, finds equivalent expressions in English, German, French, and Spanish. On the basis of a set of ontological and lexical relations, a conceptual network is built up. Concepts are thought to be universal. Objects unique in time and space are identified by names and will be explained by the universals as their instances. Our approach relies on multi-relational descriptions of concepts. It provides a powerful tool for documentation and conceptual language learning. First and foremost, our multi-lingual, polyhierarchical ontology fills the gap of semantically-based information retrieval by generating enhanced and improved queries for internet search
  12. Nelson, S.J.; Powell, T.; Srinivasan, S.; Humphreys, B.L.: Unified Medical Language System® (UMLS®) Project (2009) 0.01
    0.0063645868 = product of:
      0.01909376 = sum of:
        0.01909376 = product of:
          0.057281278 = sum of:
            0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 4701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057281278 = score(doc=4701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 4701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) is a long-term research and development effort of the National Library of Medicine, aimed at assisting users in finding information from multiple sources without understanding the intricacies of each particular source. Consisting of three major knowledge sources, a Metathesaurus, a Semantic Network, and a set of lexical processing tools, the UMLS is produced and released twice yearly. Recent efforts have been aimed at expanding coverage in genetics and in clinical vocabularies designed for use in medical record systems. RxNorm, produced and released on a monthly basis, with weekly updates, is an outgrowth of the UMLS, focusing on medication terminology.
  13. Park, J.-r.: Evolution of concept networks and implications for knowledge representation (2007) 0.01
    0.0053038225 = product of:
      0.015911467 = sum of:
        0.015911467 = product of:
          0.047734402 = sum of:
            0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047734402 = score(doc=847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present descriptive characteristics of the historical development of concept networks. The linguistic principles, mechanisms and motivations behind the evolution of concept networks are discussed. Implications emanating from the idea of the historical development of concept networks are discussed in relation to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Design/methodology/approach - Natural language data including both speech and text are analyzed by examining discourse contexts in which a linguistic element such as a polysemy or homonym occurs. Linguistic literature on the historical development of concept networks is reviewed and analyzed. Findings - Semantic sense relations in concept networks can be captured in a systematic and regular manner. The mechanism and impetus behind the process of concept network development suggest that semantic senses in concept networks are closely intertwined with pragmatic contexts and discourse structure. The interrelation and permeability of the semantic senses of concept networks are captured on a continuum scale based on three linguistic parameters: concrete shared semantic sense; discourse and text structure; and contextualized pragmatic information. Research limitations/implications - Research findings signify the critical need for linking discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Originality/value - The idea of linguistic characteristics, principles, motivation and mechanisms underlying the evolution of concept networks provides theoretical ground for developing a model for integrating knowledge representation and organization schemes with discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information.
  14. Rindflesch, T.C.; Fizsman, M.: The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing : interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text (2003) 0.01
    0.0053038225 = product of:
      0.015911467 = sum of:
        0.015911467 = product of:
          0.047734402 = sum of:
            0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047734402 = score(doc=2097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Interpretation of semantic propositions in free-text documents such as MEDLINE citations would provide valuable support for biomedical applications, and several approaches to semantic interpretation are being pursued in the biomedical informatics community. In this paper, we describe a methodology for interpreting linguistic structures that encode hypernymic propositions, in which a more specific concept is in a taxonomic relationship with a more general concept. In order to effectively process these constructions, we exploit underspecified syntactic analysis and structured domain knowledge from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). After introducing the syntactic processing on which our system depends, we focus on the UMLS knowledge that supports interpretation of hypernymic propositions. We first use semantic groups from the Semantic Network to ensure that the two concepts involved are compatible; hierarchical information in the Metathesaurus then determines which concept is more general and which more specific. A preliminary evaluation of a sample based on the semantic group Chemicals and Drugs provides 83% precision. An error analysis was conducted and potential solutions to the problems encountered are presented. The research discussed here serves as a paradigm for investigating the interaction between domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing, and could also make a contribution to research on automatic processing of discourse structure. Additional implications of the system we present include its integration in advanced semantic interpretation processors for biomedical text and its use for information extraction in specific domains. The approach has the potential to support a range of applications, including information retrieval and ontology engineering.
  15. Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a fundamental theory for structuring subject organization tools (2007) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:21:29
  16. Mustafa El Hadi, W.: Terminologies, ontologies and information access (2006) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=1488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1488)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:25:23
  17. Schubert, C.; Kinkeldey, C.; Reich, H.: Handbuch Datenbankanwendung zur Wissensrepräsentation im Verbundprojekt DeCOVER (2006) 0.01
    0.0052947453 = product of:
      0.015884236 = sum of:
        0.015884236 = product of:
          0.047652703 = sum of:
            0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047652703 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2011 18:45:23
  18. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.005247115 = product of:
      0.015741345 = sum of:
        0.015741345 = product of:
          0.047224034 = sum of:
            0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047224034 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  19. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.005247115 = product of:
      0.015741345 = sum of:
        0.015741345 = product of:
          0.047224034 = sum of:
            0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047224034 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  20. Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (2008) 0.00
    0.0046329014 = product of:
      0.013898704 = sum of:
        0.013898704 = product of:
          0.041696113 = sum of:
            0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041696113 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 14:29:06

Authors

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 7

Types