Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Jiang, Y.-C.; Li, H.: ¬The theoretical basis and basic principles of knowledge network construction in digital library (2023) 0.01
    0.0127291735 = product of:
      0.03818752 = sum of:
        0.03818752 = product of:
          0.114562556 = sum of:
            0.114562556 = weight(_text_:network in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114562556 = score(doc=1130,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.59043956 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge network construction (KNC) is the essence of dynamic knowledge architecture, and is helpful to illustrate ubiquitous knowledge service in digital libraries (DLs). The authors explore its theoretical foundations and basic rules to elucidate the basic principles of KNC in DLs. The results indicate that world general connection, small-world phenomenon, relevance theory, unity and continuity of science development have been the production tool, architecture aim and scientific foundation of KNC in DLs. By analyzing both the characteristics of KNC based on different types of knowledge linking and the relationships between different forms of knowledge and the appropriate ways of knowledge linking, the basic principle of KNC is summarized as follows: let each kind of knowledge linking form each shows its ability, each kind of knowledge manifestation each answer the purpose intended in practice, and then subjective knowledge network and objective knowledge network are organically combined. This will lay a solid theoretical foundation and provide an action guide for DLs to construct knowledge networks.
  2. Meng, K.; Ba, Z.; Ma, Y.; Li, G.: ¬A network coupling approach to detecting hierarchical linkages between science and technology (2024) 0.01
    0.009000885 = product of:
      0.027002655 = sum of:
        0.027002655 = product of:
          0.081007965 = sum of:
            0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081007965 = score(doc=1205,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Detecting science-technology hierarchical linkages is beneficial for understanding deep interactions between science and technology (S&T). Previous studies have mainly focused on linear linkages between S&T but ignored their structural linkages. In this paper, we propose a network coupling approach to inspect hierarchical interactions of S&T by integrating their knowledge linkages and structural linkages. S&T knowledge networks are first enhanced with bidirectional encoder representation from transformers (BERT) knowledge alignment, and then their hierarchical structures are identified based on K-core decomposition. Hierarchical coupling preferences and strengths of the S&T networks over time are further calculated based on similarities of coupling nodes' degree distribution and similarities of coupling edges' weight distribution. Extensive experimental results indicate that our approach is feasible and robust in identifying the coupling hierarchy with superior performance compared to other isomorphism and dissimilarity algorithms. Our research extends the mindset of S&T linkage measurement by identifying patterns and paths of the interaction of S&T hierarchical knowledge.
  3. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01
    0.005247115 = product of:
      0.015741345 = sum of:
        0.015741345 = product of:
          0.047224034 = sum of:
            0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047224034 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  4. Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020) 0.00
    0.003309216 = product of:
      0.009927647 = sum of:
        0.009927647 = product of:
          0.029782942 = sum of:
            0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029782942 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
  5. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.00
    0.003279447 = product of:
      0.009838341 = sum of:
        0.009838341 = product of:
          0.029515022 = sum of:
            0.029515022 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029515022 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  6. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.00
    0.0026235576 = product of:
      0.007870672 = sum of:
        0.007870672 = product of:
          0.023612017 = sum of:
            0.023612017 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023612017 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22