Moulaison Sandy, H.L.; Dykas, F.: High-quality metadata and repository staffing : perceptions of United States-based OpenDOAR participants (2016)
0.01
0.009149151 = product of:
0.036596604 = sum of:
0.036596604 = product of:
0.07319321 = sum of:
0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07319321 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Digital repositories require good metadata, created according to community-based principles that include provisions for interoperability. When metadata is of high quality, digital objects become sharable and metadata can be harvested and reused outside of the local system. A sample of U.S.-based repository administrators from the OpenDOAR initiative were surveyed to understand aspects of the quality and creation of their metadata, and how their metadata could improve. Most respondents (65%) thought their metadata was of average quality; none thought their metadata was high quality or poor quality. The discussion argues that increased strategic staffing will alleviate many perceived issues with metadata quality.
