Kless, D.; Milton, S.: Comparison of thesauri and ontologies from a semiotic perspective (2010)
0.01
0.007842129 = product of:
0.031368516 = sum of:
0.031368516 = product of:
0.06273703 = sum of:
0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06273703 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Thesauri are frequently stated or indirectly treated as subtype of ontologies or vice versa while other definitions explicitly distinguish them. To encounter the lack of clarity this paper provides an in-depth comparison of these types of models. The comparison followed a semiotic approach and considered syntactic, semantic and pragmatic differences between ontologies and thesauri. For the comparison data models of thesauri and ontologies were produced that - in contrast to existing meta- and datamodels - are comparable with each other. The analysis revealed significant differences in the semiotic aspects of thesauri and ontologies. This finding challenges the treatment of ontologies and thesauri as type of one another. The comparison presented in this paper shall also provide input for standardization efforts in clarifying the relatedness of thesauri and ontologies.
