-
Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013)
0.01
0.0142422225 = product of:
0.05696889 = sum of:
0.05696889 = weight(_text_:social in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05696889 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Publishers present novels with summaries, librarians provide subject headings, classification numbers and annotations, literary theorists write reviews. Readers share opinions and tags in social networks. These groups share interest in the same novel and possibly in the same library catalogs. I analyze the descriptions of novels written by these four groups to propose the enhancement of library catalogs. Results show that the story, information about the author, genre, personal experience with reading the novel, and an evaluation (awards, personal evaluation) are consistently presented by all four groups and should become standard elements for the subject description of fiction.
-
Sauperl, A.: Catalogers' common ground and shared knowledge (2004)
0.01
0.010173016 = product of:
0.040692065 = sum of:
0.040692065 = weight(_text_:social in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040692065 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The problem of multiple interpretations of meaning in the indexing process has been mostly avoided by information scientists. Among the few who have addressed this question are Clare Beghtol and Jens Erik Mai. Their findings and findings of other researchers in the area of information science, social psychology, and psycholinguistics indicate that the source of the problem might lie in the background and culture of each indexer or cataloger. Are the catalogers aware of the problem? A general model of the indexing process was developed from observations and interviews of 12 catalogers in three American academic libraries. The model is illustrated with a hypothetical cataloger's process. The study with catalogers revealed that catalogers are aware of the author's, the user's, and their own meaning, but do not try to accommodate them all. On the other hand, they make every effort to build common ground with catalog users by studying documents related to the document being cataloged, and by considering catalog records and subject headings related to the subject identified in the document being cataloged. They try to build common ground with other catalogers by using cataloging tools and by inferring unstated rules of cataloging from examples in the catalogs.
-
Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010)
0.01
0.010173016 = product of:
0.040692065 = sum of:
0.040692065 = weight(_text_:social in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040692065 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Social tagging systems, known as "folksonomies," represent an important part of web resource discovery as they enable free and unrestricted browsing through information space. Folksonomies consisting of subject designators (tags) assigned by users, however, have one important drawback: they do not express semantic relationships, either hierarchical or associative, between tags. As a consequence, the use of tags to browse information resources requires moving from one resource to another, based on coincidence and not on the pre-established meaningful or logical connections that may exist between related resources. We suggest that the semantic structure of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) may be used in complementing and supporting tag-based browsing. In this work, two specific questions were investigated: 1) Are terms used as tags in folksonomies included in the UDC?; and, 2) Which facets of UDC match the characteristics of documents or information objects that are tagged in folksonomies? A collection of the most popular tags from Amazon, LibraryThing, Delicious, and 43Things was investigated. The universal nature of UDC was examined through the universality of topics and facets covering diverse human interests which are at the same time interconnected and form a rich and intricate semantic structure. The results suggest that UDC-supported folksonomies could be implemented in resource discovery, in particular in library portals and catalogues.
-
Sauperl, A.; Rozman, D.: Subject cataloguing at the crossroads : with or without subject heading strings? (2007)
0.01
0.007845511 = product of:
0.031382043 = sum of:
0.031382043 = product of:
0.062764086 = sum of:
0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062764086 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knjiznice za prihodnost : napredek in sodelovanje : zbornik referatov [ Libraries for the future : development and collaboration: proceedings / Professional conference of Union of associations of Slovene Librarians], Portoroz, October 22-23, 2007; ed. M. Ambrozic
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.00
0.004707306 = product of:
0.018829225 = sum of:
0.018829225 = product of:
0.03765845 = sum of:
0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03765845 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009)
0.00
0.0039227554 = product of:
0.015691021 = sum of:
0.015691021 = product of:
0.031382043 = sum of:
0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031382043 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:22:43
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.00
0.002353653 = product of:
0.009414612 = sum of:
0.009414612 = product of:
0.018829225 = sum of:
0.018829225 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018829225 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
