Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.05485584 = product of:
  0.10971168 = sum of:
    0.035240363 = weight(_text_:social in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035240363 = score(doc=2392,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.19077215 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.07447132 = sum of:
      0.052280862 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052280862 = score(doc=2392,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
      0.022190453 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.022190453 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)

DDC

323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)

Footnote

Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.

LCSH

Communication / Moral and ethical aspects
Information technology / Social aspects

Subject

Communication / Moral and ethical aspects
Information technology / Social aspects

0.037806172 = product of:
  0.075612344 = sum of:
    0.04603782 = weight(_text_:social in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04603782 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.24922368 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.029574523 = product of:
      0.059149045 = sum of:
        0.059149045 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059149045 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.28249177 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Information technology / Social aspects

Subject

Information technology / Social aspects

0.023857841 = product of:
  0.095431365 = sum of:
    0.095431365 = weight(_text_:social in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095431365 = score(doc=3054,freq=44.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.5166134 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
          6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
            44.0 = termFreq=44.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Teile und sammle könnte der moderne Leitspruch für das Phänomen Social Tagging heißen. Die freie und kollaborative Verschlagwortung digitaler Ressourcen im Internet gehört zu den Anwendungen aus dem Kontext von Web 2.0, die sich zunehmender Beliebtheit erfreuen. Der 2003 gegründete Social Bookmarking Dienst Del.icio.us und die 2004 entstandene Bildersammlung Flickr waren erste Anwendungen, die Social Tagging anboten und noch immer einen Großteil der Nutzer/innen an sich binden. Beim Blick in die Literatur wird schnell deutlich, dass Social Tagging polarisiert: Von Befürwortern wird es als eine Form der innovativen Wissensorganisation gefeiert, während Skeptiker die Dienste des Web 2.0 inklusive Social Tagging als globale kulturelle Bedrohung verdammen. Launischer Hype oder Quantensprung was ist dran am Social Tagging? Mit der Zielsetzung, mehr über die Erwartungen, Anwendungsbereiche und Nutzungsweisen zu erfahren, wurde im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen ein Workshop der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft (GMW) durchgeführt. Die vorliegende Publikation fasst die Ergebnisse der interdisziplinären Veranstaltung zusammen.

Content

- Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Untersuchungen Stefanie Panke & Birgit Gaiser: "With my head up in the clouds" - Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht Christoph Held& Ulrike Cress: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht Michael Derntl, Thorsten Hampel, Renate Motschnig & Tomas Pitner: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access - Einsatz von Tagging in Hochschulen und Bibliotheken Christian Hänger: Good tags or bad tags? Tagging im Kontext der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung Mandy Schiefner: Social Tagging in der universitären Lehre Michael Blank, Thomas Bopp, Thorsten Hampel & Jonas Schulte: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? Andreas Harrer & Steffen Lohmann: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse Harald Sack & Jörg Waitelonis: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche - Kommerzielle Anwendungen von Tagging Karl Tschetschonig, Roland Ladengruber, Thorsten Hampel & Jonas Schulte: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce Tilman Küchler, Jan M. Pawlowski & Volker Zimmermann: Social Tagging and Open Content: A Concept for the Future of E-Learning and Knowledge Management? Stephan Schillenvein: Der .Business Case' für die Nutzung von Social Tagging in Intranets und internen Informationssystemen
- Tagging im Semantic Web Benjamin Birkenhake: Semantic Weblog. Erfahrungen vom Bloggen mit Tags und Ontologien Simone Braun, Andreas Schmidt, Andreas Walter & Valentin Zacharias: Von Tags zu semantischen Beziehungen: kollaborative Ontologiereifung Jakob Voß: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging Georg Güntner, Rolf Sint & Rupert Westenthaler: Ein Ansatz zur Unterstützung traditioneller Klassifikation durch Social Tagging Viktoria Pammer, Tobias Ley & Stefanie Lindstaedt: tagr: Unterstützung in kollaborativen Tagging-Umgebungen durch Semantische und Assoziative Netzwerke Matthias Quasthoff Harald Sack & Christoph Meinet: Nutzerfreundliche Internet-Sicherheit durch tag-basierte Zugriffskontrolle

Footnote

Enthält die Beiträge der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen. Volltext unter: http://www.waxmann.com/kat/inhalt/2039Volltext.pdf. Vgl. die Rez. unter: http://sehepunkte.de/2008/11/14934.html. Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.246-247 (C. Wolff): "Tagging-Systeme erfreuen sich in den letzten Jahren einer ungemein großen Beliebtheit, erlauben sie dem Nutzer doch die Informationserschließung "mit eigenen Worten", also ohne Rekurs auf vorgegebene Ordnungs- und Begriffsysteme und für Medien wie Bild und Video, für die herkömmliche Verfahren des Information Retrieval (noch) versagen. Die Beherrschung der Film- und Bilderfülle, wie wir sie bei Flickr oder YouTube vorfinden, ist mit anderen Mitteln als dem intellektuellen Einsatz der Nutzer nicht vorstellbar - eine professionelle Aufbereitung angesichts der Massendaten (und ihrer zu einem großen Teil auch minderen Qualität) nicht möglich und sinnvoll. Insofern hat sich Tagging als ein probates Mittel der Erschließung herausgebildet, das dort Lücken füllen kann, wo andere Verfahren (Erschließung durch information professionals, automatische Indexierung, Erschließung durch Autoren) fehlen oder nicht anwendbar sind. Unter dem Titel "Good Tags - Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" und der Herausgeberschaft von Birgit Gaiser, Thorsten Hampel und Stefanie Panke sind in der Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft (Bd. 47) Beiträge eines interdisziplinären Workshops der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft zum Thema Tagging versammelt, der im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen stattgefunden hat. . . .
Kommentar M. Buzinkay: "Bibliotheken werden um Social Tagging nicht herum kommen, da schlichtweg die Kapazitäten für eine inhaltliche Erschließung fehlen. Stattdessen wäre es von Notwendigkeit, Normdateien zum Bestandteil des Tagging zu machen. Verfehlt wäre es, auf die bibliothekarische Erschließung zu verzichten, weil das zu Lasten des Verhältnisses von Recall und Precision gehen würde." (In: http://www.buzinkay.net/blog-de/2009/05/buchrezension-good-tags-bad-tags/)

RSWK

Wissensorganisation / Social Tagging / Aufsatzsammlung

Subject

Wissensorganisation / Social Tagging / Aufsatzsammlung

Theme

Social tagging

0.016276827 = product of:
  0.06510731 = sum of:
    0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06510731 = score(doc=4313,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information behavior has emerged as an important aspect of human life, however our knowledge and understanding of it is incomplete and underdeveloped scientifically. Research on the topic is largely contemporary in focus and has generally not incorporated results from other disciplines. In this monograph Spink provides a new understanding of information behavior by incorporating related findings, theories and models from social sciences, psychology and cognition. In her presentation, she argues that information behavior is an important instinctive sociocognitive ability that can only be fully understood with a highly interdisciplinary approach. The leitmotivs of her examination are three important research questions: First, what is the evolutionary, biological and developmental nature of information behavior? Second, what is the role of instinct versus environment in shaping information behavior? And, third, how have information behavior capabilities evolved and developed over time? Written for researchers in information science as well as social and cognitive sciences, Spink's controversial text lays the foundation for a new interdisciplinary theoretical perspective on information behavior that will not only provide a more holistic framework for this field but will also impact those sciences, and thus also open up many new research directions.

LCSH

Social sciences

Subject

Social sciences

0.011509455 = product of:
  0.04603782 = sum of:
    0.04603782 = weight(_text_:social in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04603782 = score(doc=4005,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.24922368 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Although much of the hubris and hyperbole surrounding the 1990's Internet has softened to a reasonable level, the inexorable momentum of information growth continues unabated. This wealth of information provides resources for adapting to the problems posed by our increasingly complex world, but the simple availability of more information does not guarantee its successful transformation into valuable knowledge that shapes, guides, and improves our activity. When faced with something like the analysis of sense-making behavior on the web, traditional research models tell us a lot about learning and performance with browser operations, but very little about how people will actively navigate and search through information structures, what information they will choose to consume, and what conceptual models they will induce about the landscape of cyberspace. Thus, it is fortunate that a new field of research, Adaptive Information Interaction (AII), is becoming possible. AII centers on the problems of understanding and improving human-information interaction. It is about how people will best shape themselves to their information environments, and how information environments can best be shaped to people. Its roots lie in human-computer interaction (HCI), information retrieval, and the behavioral and social sciences. This book is about Information Foraging Theory (IFT), a new theory in Adaptive Information Interaction that is one example of a recent flourish of theories in adaptationist psychology that draw upon evolutionary-ecological theory in biology. IFT assumes that people (indeed, all organisms) are ecologically rational, and that human information-seeking mechanisms and strategies adapt the structure of the information environments in which they operate. Its main aim is to create technology that is better shaped to users. Information Foraging Theory will be of interest to student and professional researchers in HCI and cognitive psychology.

Content

Inhalt: 1. Information Foraging Theory: Framework and Method 2. Elementary Foraging Models 3. The Ecology of Information Foraging on the World Wide Web 4. Rational Analyses of Information Scent and Web Foraging 5. A Cognitive Model of Information Foraging on the Web 6. A Rational Analysis and Computational Cognitive Model of the Scatter/Gather Document Cluster Browser 7. Stochastic Models of Information Foraging by Information Scent 8. Social Information Foraging 9. Design Heuristics, Engineering Models, and Applications 10. Future Directions: Upward, Downward, Inward, and Outward

0.010173016 = product of:
  0.040692065 = sum of:
    0.040692065 = weight(_text_:social in 5190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040692065 = score(doc=5190,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 5190, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5190)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Inhalt: - Keynotes Kalervo Järvelin: Information Retrieval: Technology, Evaluation and Beyond Michael Schroeder: Semantic search for the life sciences - Evaluation Pavel Sirotkin: Predicting user preferences Hanmin Jung, Mikyoung Lee, Won-Kyung Sung, Do Wan Kim: Usefiilness Evaluation on Visualization of Researcher Networks Jens Kürsten, Thomas Wilhelm, Maximilian Eibl: Vergleich von IR-Systemkonfigurationen auf Komponentenebene - Informationsinfrastruktur Reinhild Barkey, Erhard Hinrichs, Christina Hoppermann, Thorsten Trippel, Claus Zinn: Komponenten-basierte Metadatenschemata und Facetten-basierte Suche Ina Dehnhard, Peter Weiland: Toolbasierte Datendokumentation in der Psychologie Gertrud Faaß, Ulrich Heid: Nachhaltige Dokumentation virtueller Forschungsumgebungen - Soziale Software Evelyn Droge, Parinaz Maghferat, Cornelius Puschmann, Julia Verbina, Katrin Weller: Konferenz-Tweets Richard Heinen, Ingo Blees: Social Bookmarking als Werkzeug für die Kooperation von Lehrkräften Jens Terliesner, Isabella Peters: Der T-Index als Stabilitätsindikator für dokument-spezifische Tag-Verteilungen
- Information Professionals & Usage Rahmatollah Fattahi, Mohaddeseh Dokhtesmati, Maryam Saberi: A survey of internet searching skills among intermediate school students: How librarians can help Matthias Görtz: Kontextspezifische Erhebung von aufgabenbezogenem Informationssuchverhalten Jürgen Reischer, Daniel Lottes, Florian Meier, Matthias Stirner: Evaluation von Summarizing-Systemen Robert Mayo Hayes, Karin Karlics, Christian Schlögl: Bedarf an Informationsspezialisten in wissensintensiven Branchen der österreichischen Volkswirtschaft - User Experience fit Behavior Isto Huvila: Mining qualitative data on human information behaviour from the Web Rahel Birri Blezon, Rene Schneider: The Social Persona Approach Elena Shpilka, Ralph Koelle, Wolfgang Semar: "Mobile Tagging": Konzeption und Implementierung eines mobilen Informationssystems mit 2D-Tags Johannes Baeck, Sabine Wiem, Ralph Kölle, Thomas Mandl: User Interface Prototyping Nadine Mahrholz, Thomas Mandl, Joachim Griesbaum: Analyse und Evaluierung der Nutzung von Sitelinks Bernard Bekavac, Sonja Öttl, Thomas Weinhold: Online-Beratungskomponente für die Auswahl von Usability-Evaluationsmethoden
- Information Domains & Concepts Michal Golinski: Use, but verify Mohammad Nazim, Bhaskar Mukherjee: Problems and prospects of implementing knowledge management in university libraries: A case study of Banaras Hindu University Library System Daniela Becks, Julia Maria Schulz: Domänenübergreifende Phrasenextraktion mithilfe einer lexikonunabhängigen Analysekomponente Wolfram Sperber, Bernd Wegner: Content Analysis in der Mathematik: Erschließung und Retrieval mathematischer Publikationen Jürgen Reischer: Das Konzept der Informativität - Information Society Joseph Adjei, Peter Tobbin: Identification Systems Adoption in Africa; The Case of Ghana Alexander Botte, Marc Rittberger, Christoph Schindler: Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen Rainer Kuhlen: Der Streit um die Regelung des Zweitveröffentlichungsrechts im Urheberrecht - E-Learning / Social Media Marketing Tobias Fries, Sebastian Boosz, Andreas Henrich: Integrating industrial partners into e-teaching efforts Christopher Stehr, Melanie Hiller: E-Learningkurs Globalisierung Manuel Burghardt, Markus Heckner, Tim Schneidermeier, Christian Wolff: Social-Media-Marketing im Hochschulbereich

0.008138414 = product of:
  0.032553654 = sum of:
    0.032553654 = weight(_text_:social in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032553654 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.17622775 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information is essential to all human activity, and information in electronic form both amplifies and augments human information interactions. This lecture surveys some of the different classical meanings of information, focuses on the ways that electronic technologies are affecting how we think about these senses of information, and introduces an emerging sense of information that has implications for how we work, play, and interact with others. The evolutions of computers and electronic networks and people's uses and adaptations of these tools manifesting a dynamic space called cyberspace. Our traces of activity in cyberspace give rise to a new sense of information as instantaneous identity states that I term proflection of self. Proflections of self influence how others act toward us. Four classical senses of information are described as context for this new form of information. The four senses selected for inclusion here are the following: thought and memory, communication process, artifact, and energy. Human mental activity and state (thought and memory) have neurological, cognitive, and affective facets.The act of informing (communication process) is considered from the perspective of human intentionality and technical developments that have dramatically amplified human communication capabilities. Information artifacts comprise a common sense of information that gives rise to a variety of information industries. Energy is the most general sense of information and is considered from the point of view of physical, mental, and social state change. This sense includes information theory as a measurable reduction in uncertainty. This lecture emphasizes how electronic representations have blurred media boundaries and added computational behaviors that yield new forms of information interaction, which, in turn, are stored, aggregated, and mined to create profiles that represent our cyber identities.

0.007845511 = product of:
  0.031382043 = sum of:
    0.031382043 = product of:
      0.062764086 = sum of:
        0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062764086 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

26. 2.2008 19:22:51

0.0071211113 = product of:
  0.028484445 = sum of:
    0.028484445 = weight(_text_:social in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028484445 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.15419927 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

- Recherche und Web Rita Strebe: Empirische Untersuchung von emotionalen Reaktionen im Prozess der Informationsrecherche im Web Teresa Märt!, Christa Womser-Hacker, Thomas Mandl: Mehrsprachige Suche in Social-Tagging-Systemen Christian Maaß, Dirk Lewandowski: Frage-Antwort-Dienste als alternativer Suchansatz? Jürgen Reischer: EXCERPT - a Within-Document Retrieval System Using Summarization Techniques - Fachportale - Open Access I Stefan Baerisch, Peter Mutschke, Maximilian Stempfliuber: Informationstechnologische Aspekte der Heterogenitätsbehandlung in Fachportalen Doris Bambey: Open Access in der Erziehungswissenschaft - Voraussetzungen und Modelle der Funktionsteilung und der Verwertung von Wissen Patrick Lay: Integration heterogener Anwendungen in Fachportalen am Beispiel Sowiport Martin Uhl, Erich Weichselgartner: Aufbau einer innovativen Publikations-Infrastrukrur für die europäische Psychologie

0.0039227554 = product of:
  0.015691021 = sum of:
    0.015691021 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031382043 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2008 17:36:03

0.003138204 = product of:
  0.012552816 = sum of:
    0.012552816 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025105633 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 3.2008 18:05:16

0.0027459285 = product of:
  0.010983714 = sum of:
    0.010983714 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021967428 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2008 14:05:48

0.002353653 = product of:
  0.009414612 = sum of:
    0.009414612 = product of:
      0.018829225 = sum of:
        0.018829225 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018829225 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

11. 5.2008 19:49:22