Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"71.43 Technologische Faktoren Soziologie"
  1. Humphreys, L.: ¬The qualified self : social media and the accounting of everyday life (2018) 0.09
    0.09468183 = product of:
      0.18936366 = sum of:
        0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13021462 = score(doc=5364,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
        0.059149045 = product of:
          0.11829809 = sum of:
            0.11829809 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11829809 = score(doc=5364,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.56498355 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    How sharing the mundane details of daily life did not start with Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube but with pocket diaries, photo albums, and baby books. Social critiques argue that social media have made us narcissistic, that Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube are all vehicles for me-promotion. In The Qualified Self, Lee Humphreys offers a different view. She shows that sharing the mundane details of our lives?what we ate for lunch, where we went on vacation, who dropped in for a visit?didn't begin with mobile devices and social media. People have used media to catalog and share their lives for several centuries. Pocket diaries, photo albums, and baby books are the predigital precursors of today's digital and mobile platforms for posting text and images. The ability to take selfies has not turned us into needy narcissists; it's part of a longer story about how people account for everyday life. Humphreys refers to diaries in which eighteenth-century daily life is documented with the brevity and precision of a tweet, and cites a nineteenth-century travel diary in which a young woman complains that her breakfast didn't agree with her. Diaries, Humphreys explains, were often written to be shared with family and friends. Pocket diaries were as mobile as smartphones, allowing the diarist to record life in real time. Humphreys calls this chronicling, in both digital and nondigital forms, media accounting. The sense of self that emerges from media accounting is not the purely statistics-driven ?quantified self,? but the more well-rounded qualified self. We come to understand ourselves in a new way through the representations of ourselves that we create to be consumed.
    LCSH
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Social media
    Diaries / Social aspects
    Self / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    RSWK
    Social Media / Alltag / Selbstdarstellung / Narzissmus
    Subject
    Social Media / Alltag / Selbstdarstellung / Narzissmus
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Social media
    Diaries / Social aspects
    Self / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
  2. Boczkowski, P.; Mitchelstein, E.: ¬The digital environment : How we live, learn, work, and play now (2021) 0.09
    0.09424742 = product of:
      0.18849485 = sum of:
        0.07973984 = weight(_text_:social in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07973984 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.43166807 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
        0.10875501 = sum of:
          0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083649375 = score(doc=1003,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.025105633 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025105633 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Increasingly we live through our personal screens; we work, play, socialize, and learn digitally. The shift to remote everything during the pandemic was another step in a decades-long march toward the digitization of everyday life made possible by innovations in media, information, and communication technology. In The Digital Environment, Pablo Boczkowski and Eugenia Mitchelstein offer a new way to understand the role of the digital in our daily lives, calling on us to turn our attention from our discrete devices and apps to the array of artifacts and practices that make up the digital environment that envelops every aspect of our social experience. Boczkowski and Mitchelstein explore a series of issues raised by the digital takeover of everyday life, drawing on interviews with a variety of experts. They show how existing inequities of gender, race, ethnicity, education, and class are baked into the design and deployment of technology, and describe emancipatory practices that counter this--including the use of Twitter as a platform for activism through such hashtags as #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo. They discuss the digitization of parenting, schooling, and dating--noting, among other things, that today we can both begin and end relationships online. They describe how digital media shape our consumption of sports, entertainment, and news, and consider the dynamics of political campaigns, disinformation, and social activism. Finally, they report on developments in three areas that will be key to our digital future: data science, virtual reality, and space exploration.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:25:18
    LCSH
    Cyberspace / Social aspects
    Digital media / Social aspects
    Subject
    Cyberspace / Social aspects
    Digital media / Social aspects
  3. Floridi, L.: ¬Die 4. Revolution : wie die Infosphäre unser Leben verändert (2015) 0.05
    0.053466 = product of:
      0.106932 = sum of:
        0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06510731 = score(doc=3561,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=3561,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    LCSH
    Information technology ; Social aspects
    Internet / Social aspects
    Subject
    Information technology ; Social aspects
    Internet / Social aspects
  4. Facets of Facebook : use and users (2016) 0.02
    0.020346032 = product of:
      0.08138413 = sum of:
        0.08138413 = weight(_text_:social in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08138413 = score(doc=4231,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.44056937 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The debate on Facebook raises questions about the use and users of this information service. This collected volume gathers a broad spectrum of social science and information science articles about Facebook.Facebook has many facets, and we just look forward above all to the use and users. The facet of users has sub-facets, such as different age, sex, and culture. The facet of use consists of sub-facets of privacy behavior after the Snowden affair, dealing with friends, unfriending and becoming unfriended on Facebook, and possible Facebook addiction. We also consider Facebook as a source for local temporary history and respond to acceptance and quality perceptions of this social network service, as well. This book brings together all the contributions of research facets on Facebook. It is a much needed compilation written by leading scholars in the fields of investigation of the impact of Web 2.0. The target groups are social media researchers, information scientists and social scientists, and also all those who take to Facebook topics.
  5. Dijk, J: ¬The digital divide (2020) 0.01
    0.01220762 = product of:
      0.04883048 = sum of:
        0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04883048 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    What is the digital divide? -- Research and theory of the digital divide -- Motivation and attitude -- Physical access -- Digital and 21st-century skills usage inequality -- Outcomes -- Social and digital inequality -- Solutions to soften the digital divide.
  6. Kurzweil, R.: Menschheit 2.0 : die Singularität naht (2014) 0.00
    0.004707306 = product of:
      0.018829225 = sum of:
        0.018829225 = product of:
          0.03765845 = sum of:
            0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03765845 = score(doc=4072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 17:33:05

Languages

Themes