Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.03
    0.025098871 = product of:
      0.100395486 = sum of:
        0.100395486 = sum of:
          0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06273703 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03765845 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
  2. Stöber, T.; Teichert, A.: Webbasierte Literaturverwaltung : neue Kooperationsformen und Anwendungsszenarien (2008) 0.01
    0.014096146 = product of:
      0.056384586 = sum of:
        0.056384586 = weight(_text_:social in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056384586 = score(doc=2564,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.30523545 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der Bereich der Literaturverwaltung ist in den letzten Jahren stark in Bewegung geraten. Wurde der Markt über lange Jahre durch Anwendungen wie Endnote und Reference Manager dominiert, sind nun in kurzer Zeit neben diese etablierten Produkte zahlreiche neue Softwares und Tools getreten. So gibt es seit 2002 mit RefWorks ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm, das vollkommen webbasiert arbeitet; im Bereich der Social Software sind Anwendungen wie BibSonomy, CiteULike und Connotea entstanden; und das vielbeachtete Tool Zotero4 beschreitet gänzlich neue Wege, indem es sich als Add-On direkt in den Browser integriert. Ein umfangreicher Vergleich wichtiger aktueller Literaturverwaltungsprogramme bzw. -dienste, der im Rahmen eines DFG-Projekts an der UB Augsburg entstanden ist, hat dabei gezeigt, dass die verglichenen kommerziellen Programme (Citavi, Endnote mit Endnote Web, RefWorks) mittlerweile kaum mehr Unterschiede beim Leistungsumfang aufweisen. Der zentrale Unterschied liegt vielmehr in der zugrundeliegenden Arbeitsphilosophie: während Anwendungen wie Citavi und Endnote als Einzelplatzlösungen konzipiert sind und eher auf einen individuellen Datenpool abzielen, arbeiten Endnote Web und RefWorks webbasiert und können dadurch auch eine Reihe zusätzlicher Kooperationsfunktionalitäten bereitstellen. Ebenfalls webbasiert arbeiten Dienste wie BibSonomy und Connotea, die in den letzten Jahren neben diese kommerziellen Produkte getreten sind und das Prinzip der Social Software auf den Bereich der Literaturverwaltung übertragen. Auf diese Entwicklung haben bereits erste Bibliotheken reagiert und diese Dienste in ihre Angebote eingebunden. So kann beispielsweise im Kölner Universitäts-Gesamtkatalog aus der Trefferanzeige heraus über einen entsprechenden Button ein Treffer direkt an BibSonomy gesendet werden; die Metadaten der im Dokumentenserver der LMU München gespeicherten Dokumente werden automatisch in Connotea eingespeist. Diese Beispiele machen deutlich, dass wir es derzeit mit einer sehr dynamischen Entwicklung zu tun haben, die zugleich offenbar zu einem qualitativen Sprung im Bereich der Literaturverwaltungsprogramme bzw. -dienste geführt hat. Um diesen qualitativen Sprung etwas genauer zu beschreiben, möchten wir im Folgenden eine Typologie vorstellen mit dem Ziel, die einzelnen Entwicklungstendenzen besser sichtbar zu machen. Im Anschluss möchten wir auf die Frage eingehen, welche konkreten neuen Anwendungsszenarien des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens sich aus diesen Entwicklungen ableiten lassen. Wir unterscheiden in diesem Sinne drei Arten von Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen: 1. die "traditionelle" Literaturverwaltung, die wesentlich auf einen einzelnen Nutzer und seine Daten bezogen ist ("geschlossenes System") 2. die webbasierte Literaturverwaltung I, die Online-Accounts bereitstellt mit der Möglichkeit von begrenzten Freigaben für andere Nutzer ("halboffenes System") 3. die webbasierte Literaturverwaltung II, die - ganz im Sinne der Social Software - auf einen gemeinsamen Datenpool abzielt ("offenes System").
  3. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.01
    0.012552816 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = product of:
          0.10042253 = sum of:
            0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10042253 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  4. Smith-Cohen, D.: Developing an inhouse database from online sources (1993) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 4277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=4277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 4277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the creation of a database of citations in a narrow subject area from references downloaded from commercial databases, with customised added indexing, for access by end users. The database was on the subject of biological environmental and physical aspects of arctic wetlands and was compiled by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Databases were selected from the DIALOG and ORBIT hosts and downloaded records were loaded into a database using Pro-Cite software and searched using Inmagic search software
  5. Amba, S.; Meenakshi, R.; Rao, S.S.: Creation of a database of references using CDS/ISIS (1994) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS was used to develop a database of references for publications of the Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), India. The CLRI conducts both fundamental and applied research into leather, leather products, leather auxiliaries and chemicals, and on the environmental and economic aspects of the leather industry. The database was designed to serve not only as a bibliographic tool but also as a component of an information system for management. Describes the construction of the database, the indexing technique chosen, the thesaurus provided, and problems encountered in the development of the database
  6. Dell'Orso, F.: Micro CDS/ISIS : analisi di un information retrieval system per personal computer (1995) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Continuing a previous article on CDS/ISIS Micro functions and procedures, illustrates other aspects by recapitulating the strong and weak points of the system. Defects include lack of user firendliness, the search and cataloguing functions, index management, and import/export. Favourable features are total file definition, the formatting language, alphabetical sorting, commands, and data transfer to/from other software environments. ISIS, developed by UNESCO, is a good product, and although demanding for the user, repays the effort made
  7. Sur, S.N.; Chowdhury, G.G.: ¬A prototype design of a bibliographic database based on CCF using Micro-CDS/ISIS (1993) 0.01
    0.007842129 = product of:
      0.031368516 = sum of:
        0.031368516 = product of:
          0.06273703 = sum of:
            0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 8488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06273703 = score(doc=8488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 8488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Design aspects of bibliographic databases are of utmost importance for effective resource sharing and for providing better information retrieval services in libraries. Standard formats such as the Common Communication Format (CCF) may be adapted for the design of databases. Experience shows that some modifications to the CCF format may be more useful for manipulation of data for various libray operations. Proposes the design of a bibliographic database based on CCF for use in Micr-CDS/ISIS. Almost all the mandatory CCF fields have been adopted and a few new fields added for achieving better results. Formats for display of records conform to AACR2. Provides ample catalogue entries and sample indexes to illustrate how the proposed design helps perform various information retrieval operations in libraries. Modifications in the display of records may be achieved with little effort
  8. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.01
    0.0071211113 = product of:
      0.028484445 = sum of:
        0.028484445 = weight(_text_:social in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028484445 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.15419927 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  10. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  11. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  12. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  13. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  14. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  15. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
  16. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  17. Rothera, H.: Framing the subject : a subject indexing model for electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities (1998) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33
  18. Mahmood, K.: ¬The best library software for developing countries : more than 30 plus points of Micro CDS/ISIS (1997) 0.01
    0.005491857 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = product of:
          0.043934856 = sum of:
            0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043934856 = score(doc=7890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  19. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.01
    0.005491857 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = product of:
          0.043934856 = sum of:
            0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043934856 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  20. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.00
    0.004707306 = product of:
      0.018829225 = sum of:
        0.018829225 = product of:
          0.03765845 = sum of:
            0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03765845 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15