Search (67 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.03
    0.029282015 = product of:
      0.11712806 = sum of:
        0.11712806 = sum of:
          0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07319321 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043934856 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
  2. Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009) 0.03
    0.029282015 = product of:
      0.11712806 = sum of:
        0.11712806 = sum of:
          0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07319321 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
          0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043934856 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046325076 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:53
  3. Studwell, W.E.: Format integration : the most invisible new major change in cataloging (1995) 0.02
    0.020346032 = product of:
      0.08138413 = sum of:
        0.08138413 = weight(_text_:social in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08138413 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.44056937 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Behavioral and social sciences librarian. 14(1995) no.1, S.63-65
  4. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.02
    0.016276827 = product of:
      0.06510731 = sum of:
        0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06510731 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
  5. Lauro, A. Di: IDIN manual for the creation and management of a bibliographic database using Micro-ISIS (1988) 0.01
    0.0142422225 = product of:
      0.05696889 = sum of:
        0.05696889 = weight(_text_:social in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05696889 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die UNESCO vertreibt kostenfrei die Software Micro-ISIS für PCs. Zur Anwendung in kleinen Dokumentationseinrichtungen unter dem Dach des International Development Information Network (IDIN) wurde ein eigenes IDIN-Format geschaffen, das unter dieser Software eingesetzt werden kann. Besonders berücksichtigt sind dabei unselbständige Werke und die Sacherschließung mit Hilfe des 'OECD Macrothesaurus for Information Processing in the Field of Economic and Social Development'. Das Format ist abgeleitet vom 'Common Communication Format (CCF)', das ebenfalls im Auftrag der Unesco entwickelt wurde. IDIN ist eine vereinfachte Version und hat eine andere Behandlung mehrteiliger Werke
  6. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01
    0.013314273 = product of:
      0.053257093 = sum of:
        0.053257093 = product of:
          0.106514186 = sum of:
            0.106514186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.106514186 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  7. Tillett, B.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : theoretical and practical foundations (1995) 0.01
    0.0130702155 = product of:
      0.052280862 = sum of:
        0.052280862 = product of:
          0.104561724 = sum of:
            0.104561724 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.104561724 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The study covers the full range of functions for the bibliographic record in its widest sense. Discusses theoretical and practical aspects, methodology and the future
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01
    0.012552816 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = product of:
          0.10042253 = sum of:
            0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10042253 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  9. Miller, K.; Matthews, B.: Having the right connections : the LIMBER project (2001) 0.01
    0.01220762 = product of:
      0.04883048 = sum of:
        0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04883048 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As with any journey, you have to make the right connections if you want to reach your desired destination. The goal in the LIMBER project is to facilitate cross-European data analysis independent of domain, resource, language and vocabulary. The paper describes the expertise, associations, standards and architecture underlying the project deliverables designed to achieve the project's ambitious aims. - Limber (Language Independent Metadata Browsing of European Resources) is an EU (European Union) IST (Information Societies Technology) funded project that seeks to address the problems of linguistic and discipline boundaries, which, within a more integrated European environment, are becoming increasingly important. Decision-makers, researchers and journalists need to be provided with a broader, comparative picture of society across the continent; with the social science information often required to be correlated with information from domains such as environmental science, geography and health. This cross-discipline interoperability will be provided via a uniform metadata description. In addition, the provision of multilingual user interfaces and the controlled vocabulary of a multi-lingual thesaurus will make these datasets globally accessible in a range of end-user natural languages
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01
    0.010983714 = product of:
      0.043934856 = sum of:
        0.043934856 = product of:
          0.08786971 = sum of:
            0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08786971 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  11. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01
    0.010983714 = product of:
      0.043934856 = sum of:
        0.043934856 = product of:
          0.08786971 = sum of:
            0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08786971 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  12. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01
    0.010983714 = product of:
      0.043934856 = sum of:
        0.043934856 = product of:
          0.08786971 = sum of:
            0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08786971 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01
    0.010983714 = product of:
      0.043934856 = sum of:
        0.043934856 = product of:
          0.08786971 = sum of:
            0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08786971 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  14. Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields
  15. Merwe, H.C.J. van der: SAMARC versus USMARC and UNIMARC : a position paper (1997) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The original purpose of the MARC format was to specify the formatting of data to be exchanged electronically. Compares the SAMARC format with USMARC and UNIMARC, both well established and widely used in the International community, in terms of scope, updating mechanisms, completeness and the current status of the formats. Recommends conversion to USMARC given the fact that SAMARC is hampered by an inadequate infrastructure which makes it unresponsive to immediate needs and the UNIMARC is still being developed. Discusses the benefits and the negative aspects of converting to USMARC
  16. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01
    0.009414612 = product of:
      0.03765845 = sum of:
        0.03765845 = product of:
          0.0753169 = sum of:
            0.0753169 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0753169 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  17. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01
    0.008876181 = product of:
      0.035504725 = sum of:
        0.035504725 = product of:
          0.07100945 = sum of:
            0.07100945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07100945 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  18. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.008876181 = product of:
      0.035504725 = sum of:
        0.035504725 = product of:
          0.07100945 = sum of:
            0.07100945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07100945 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  19. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.007845511 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = product of:
          0.062764086 = sum of:
            0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062764086 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  20. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01
    0.007845511 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = product of:
          0.062764086 = sum of:
            0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062764086 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46

Years

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 12
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 58
  • s 5
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…