Search (190 results, page 1 of 10)

0.0732383 = product of:
  0.1464766 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=4290,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
    0.031382043 = product of:
      0.062764086 = sum of:
        0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062764086 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Part 11 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.169-190

0.0732383 = product of:
  0.1464766 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2682,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
    0.031382043 = product of:
      0.062764086 = sum of:
        0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062764086 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Part 1 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

Date

17. 1.1999 10:44:22

0.0732383 = product of:
  0.1464766 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=3563,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
    0.031382043 = product of:
      0.062764086 = sum of:
        0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062764086 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Part 12 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage. Information about the new databases were obtained from the Gale Directory of Databases

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.5, S.323-336

0.051703054 = product of:
  0.10340611 = sum of:
    0.08457688 = weight(_text_:social in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08457688 = score(doc=3460,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.45785317 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
    0.018829225 = product of:
      0.03765845 = sum of:
        0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03765845 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This study explores how and why people participate in collaborative knowledge-building practices in the context of Wikipedia. Based on a survey of 223 Wikipedians, this study examines the relationship between motivations, internal cognitive beliefs, social-relational factors, and knowledge-sharing intentions. Results from structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis reveal that attitudes, knowledge self-efficacy, and a basic norm of generalized reciprocity have significant and direct relationships with knowledge-sharing intentions. Altruism (an intrinsic motivator) is positively related to attitudes toward knowledge sharing, whereas reputation (an extrinsic motivator) is not a significant predictor of attitude. The study also reveals that a social-relational factor, namely, a sense of belonging, is related to knowledge-sharing intentions indirectly through different motivational and social factors such as altruism, subjective norms, knowledge self-efficacy, and generalized reciprocity. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Date

1. 6.2010 10:13:22

0.03806394 = product of:
  0.15225576 = sum of:
    0.15225576 = weight(_text_:social in 4916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15225576 = score(doc=4916,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.8242298 = fieldWeight in 4916, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4916)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Many information portals are adding social features with hopes of enhancing the overall user experience. Invitations to join and welcome pages that highlight these social features are expected to encourage use and participation. While this approach is widespread and seems plausible, the effect of providing and highlighting social features remains to be tested. We studied the effects of emphasizing social features on users' response to invitations, their decisions to join, their willingness to provide profile information, and their engagement with the portal's social features. The results of a quasi-experiment found no significant effect of social emphasis in invitations on receivers' responsiveness. However, users receiving invitations highlighting social benefits were less likely to join the portal and provide profile information. Social emphasis in the initial welcome page for the site also was found to have a significant effect on whether individuals joined the portal, how much profile information they provided and shared, and how much they engaged with social features on the site. Unexpectedly, users who were welcomed in a social manner were less likely to join and provided less profile information; they also were less likely to engage with social features of the portal. This suggests that even in online contexts where social activity is an increasingly common feature, highlighting the presence of social features may not always be the optimal presentation strategy.

0.029282015 = product of:
  0.11712806 = sum of:
    0.11712806 = sum of:
      0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07319321 = score(doc=3587,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
      0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043934856 = score(doc=3587,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Contribution to an issue devoted on the weeding and maintenance of reference collections. CD-ROM has become part of the library universe and increasing numbers of libraries are considering the acquisition of reference tools in the new format. Issues of evaluation and selection, hardware purchase, and budget are primary concerns in this decision. Many aspects of day-to-day maintenance and access to CD-ROM sources must also be considered in the evaluation process. These issue-space, security, the care and feeding of hardware and software, reference assistance, staffing and staff training, and user instruction are vital to the success of CD-ROM in the library. Focuses particularly on literature about training for staff and users.

Date

14. 1.1996 4:22:54

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2681,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2681, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2681)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 8 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2683,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2683, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2683)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 2 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2684,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2684, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2684)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 3 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2685,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2685, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2685)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 4 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 5 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2687,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 6 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028773637 = product of:
  0.11509455 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 2688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=2688,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 2688, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2688)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Part 9 of a continuing series devoted to new online and CD-ROM databases in the fields of social sciences, humanities, news and general coverage

0.028484445 = product of:
  0.11393778 = sum of:
    0.11393778 = weight(_text_:social in 4104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11393778 = score(doc=4104,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 4104, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4104)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Behavioral and social sciences librarian. 17(1998) no.1, S.91-93

0.028192293 = product of:
  0.11276917 = sum of:
    0.11276917 = weight(_text_:social in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11276917 = score(doc=4871,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6104709 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

SOSIG (Social Science Information Gateway) aims to provide a trusted source of selected, high quality Internet information for researchers and practitioners in the social sciences, business and law. This article tracks the the development of the gateway since its inception in 1994, describes the current features and looks at some of the associated research and development areas that are taking place around the service including the automatic classification of Web resources and experiments with multilingual thesauri

0.028191544 = product of:
  0.05638309 = sum of:
    0.040692065 = weight(_text_:social in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040692065 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
    0.015691021 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031382043 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Literaturflut. Medizinische Forschung gibt es nicht nur in Forschungsinstituten mit vielerlei Spezialgebieten wie Vergiftungen, Krebsforschung, Zellbiologie usw., sondern auch in Universitätsklinika, Spezialkliniken und nicht zuletzt in der pharmazeutischen Industrie. Ärzte sind fleißige Schreiber, die auch über Kasuistiken, retrospektive Auswertungen der Krankenakten, prospektive Erhebungen, klinische Studien und natürlich auch über vielerlei Laborforschung, Versuche mit Zellkulturen und über Tierversuche berichten. Hinzu kommt Literatur von Institutionen und Firmen, die Medizingeräte (z.B. Beatmungsgeräte, Narkosegeräte, chirurgisches Instrumentarium, Röntgengeräte usw.) oder Medizinprodukte (z.B. Verbandsmaterial, Prothesen, Nahtmaterial, orthopädische Hilfen) herstellen. Vermutlich ist die Literaturflut in der Medizin größer als in jedem anderen Fachgebiet. Datenbasen und Datenbanken. Die derzeit wichtigsten Datenbasen für die medizinische Literaturdokumentation sind MEDLINE der US National Library of Medicine (siehe Glossar), BIOSIS, hergestellt von BIOSciences Information Service, EMBASE, hergestellt von Elsevier Science B.V. sowie eine ganze Reihe von Datenbasen mit Spezialgebieten wie z.B. TOXLINE. Der wichtigste Anbieter medizinischer Datenbanken in Deutschland ist das Deutsche Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI) in Köln, das 90 Datenbanken mit zusammen über 100 Millionen Dokumenten anbietet. Die Bedeutung der medizinischen Literatur zeigt sich auch am Science Citation Index (SCI). Im SCI sind 2345 medizinische Zeitschriften erfasst. Das sind 39% aller 6073 vom SCI erfassten naturwissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften. Nimmt man den Social-SCI mit 1798 Zeitschriften und den Art and Humanities-CI mit 1133 Zeitschriften noch hinzu, so haben die medizinischen Zeitschriften immer noch einen Anteil von 26%. Hinzu kommt, dass medizinische Zeitschriften meist mehr Hefte pro Jahr und dickere Hefte haben als die Zeitschriften anderer Fachgebiete.

Date

5. 4.2013 10:22:15

0.027297068 = product of:
  0.10918827 = sum of:
    0.10918827 = weight(_text_:social in 6121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10918827 = score(doc=6121,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.59108585 = fieldWeight in 6121, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6121)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.8, S.1130-1132 (S.R. Tompson): "The editors of This text in MIT Press' Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing series deliberately view digital libraries (DLs) as "sociotechnical systems" - "networks of technology. information. documents, people and practices''. They allow an additional definition of "sociotechnical" as "an analytical stance that privileges neither the social nor the technological and in which neither is reducible to the other". This is an important definition, as it is the foundation of the contributors' sociological approach to digital libraries, an approach not typical of the DL literature which still focuses "largely on the technology itself". Bishop et al. have two stated goals for this volume: 1. "... to inform police and professional practice in DLs with socially grounded understanding of DLs as part of a web of social relations and practices. 2. "... to perform technically informed social analysis of phenomena of interest to social scientists that are highlighted by digital libraries. specifically issues of work, groups, and knowledge"."

0.025098871 = product of:
  0.100395486 = sum of:
    0.100395486 = sum of:
      0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06273703 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03765845 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.

Date

18.11.2014 13:22:03

0.02441524 = product of:
  0.09766096 = sum of:
    0.09766096 = weight(_text_:social in 6517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09766096 = score(doc=6517,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 6517, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6517)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes electronic sources of information on family studies which includes perspectives from psychology, sociology, and social work and other disciplines where emphasis is placed on the family system. Describes online databases, CD-ROM databases and Internet resources

0.02441524 = product of:
  0.09766096 = sum of:
    0.09766096 = weight(_text_:social in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09766096 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)