Search (253 results, page 1 of 13)

0.09260583 = product of:
  0.18521166 = sum of:
    0.11276917 = weight(_text_:social in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11276917 = score(doc=6056,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6104709 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
    0.072442494 = product of:
      0.14488499 = sum of:
        0.14488499 = weight(_text_:aspects in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14488499 = score(doc=6056,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.69196075 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Information society / Social aspects
Information technology / Social aspects
Technological innovations / Social aspects
Internet / Social aspects
Technology / Social aspects
Digital media / Social aspects

Subject

Information society / Social aspects
Information technology / Social aspects
Technological innovations / Social aspects
Internet / Social aspects
Technology / Social aspects
Digital media / Social aspects

0.08055038 = product of:
  0.16110076 = sum of:
    0.13496032 = weight(_text_:social in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13496032 = score(doc=3630,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.73060167 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
    0.026140431 = product of:
      0.052280862 = sum of:
        0.052280862 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052280862 = score(doc=3630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - Social websites have become a major medium for social interaction. From Facebook to MySpace to emergent sites like Twitter, social websites are increasing exponentially in user numbers and unique visits every day. How do these websites encourage sociability? What features or design practices enable users to socialize with other users? The purpose of this paper is to explore sociability on the social web and details how different social websites encourage their users to interact. Design/methodology/approach - Four social websites (Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter) were examined from a user study perspective. After thoroughly participating on the websites, a series of observations were recorded from each experience. These experiences were then compared to understand the different approaches of each website. Findings - Social websites use a number of different approaches to encourage sociability amongst their users. Facebook promotes privacy and representing "real world" networks in web environment, while MySpace promotes publicity and representing both real world and virtual networks in a web environment. Niche websites like LinkedIn and Twitter focus on more specific aspects of community and technology, respectively. Originality/value - A comparison of different models of sociability does not yet exist. This study focuses specifically on what makes social websites "social."

0.07997098 = product of:
  0.15994196 = sum of:
    0.10766109 = weight(_text_:social in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10766109 = score(doc=3287,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.5828185 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
    0.052280862 = product of:
      0.104561724 = sum of:
        0.104561724 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104561724 = score(doc=3287,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Does contemporary Internet technology strengthen civic engagement and democratic practice? The recent surge in online community participation has become a cultural phenomenon enmeshed in ongoing debates about the health of American civil society. But observations about online communities often concentrate on ascertaining the true nature of community and democracy, typically rehearsing familiar communitarian and liberal perspectives. This book seeks to understand the technology on its own terms, focusing on how the technological and organizational configurations of online communities frame our contemporary beliefs and assumptions about community and the individual. It analyzes key structural features of thirty award-winning online community websites to show that while the values of individual autonomy, egalitarianism, and freedom of speech dominate the discursive content of these communities, the practical realities of online life are clearly marked by exclusivity and the demands of commercialization and corporate surveillance. Promises of social empowerment are framed within consumer and therapeutic frameworks that undermine their democratic efficacy. As a result, online communities fail to revolutionize the civic landscape because they create cultures of membership that epitomize the commodification of community and public life altogether.

COMPASS

Online social networks
Internet / Social aspects
Information technology / Social aspects

Subject

Online social networks
Internet / Social aspects
Information technology / Social aspects

0.06514625 = product of:
  0.1302925 = sum of:
    0.04603782 = weight(_text_:social in 6123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04603782 = score(doc=6123,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.24922368 = fieldWeight in 6123, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6123)
    0.08425468 = sum of:
      0.059149045 = weight(_text_:aspects in 6123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059149045 = score(doc=6123,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.28249177 = fieldWeight in 6123, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6123)
      0.025105633 = weight(_text_:22 in 6123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025105633 = score(doc=6123,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 6123, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6123)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22.10.2006 10:22:33

LCSH

World Wide Web / Social aspects

Subject

World Wide Web / Social aspects

0.06465994 = product of:
  0.12931988 = sum of:
    0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04883048 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.0804894 = sum of:
      0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06273703 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.017752362 = weight(_text_:22 in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017752362 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

303.48/33 22 (LoC)

DDC

303.48/33 22 (LoC)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.1, S.150-151 (L. Westbrook): "The purpose of this volume is to bring together various analyses by international scholars of the social and cultural impact of information technology on individuals and societies (preface, n.p.). It grew from the First International Conference on Human Perspectives in the Internet Society held in Cadiz, Spain, in 2004. The editors and contributors have addressed an impressive array of significant issues with rigorous research and insightful analysis although the resulting volume does suffer from the usual unevenness in depth and content that affects books based on conference proceedings. Although the $256 price is prohibitive for many individual scholars, the effort to obtain a library edition for perusal regarding particular areas of interest is likely to prove worthwhile. Unlike many international conferences that are able to attract scholars from only a handful of nations, this genuinely diverse conference included research conducted in Australia, Beijing, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, England, Fiji, Germany, Greece, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Malaysia, Norway, Russia, Scotland, South Africa, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United States. The expense of a conference format and governmental travel restrictions may have precluded greater inclusion of the work being done to develop information technology for use in nonindustrialized nations in support of economic, social justice, and political movements. Although the cultural variants among these nations preclude direct cross-cultural comparisons, many papers carefully provide sufficient background information to make basic conceptual transfers possible. A great strength of the work is the unusual combination of academic disciplines that contributes substantially to the depth of many individual papers, particularly when they are read within the larger context of the entire volume. Although complete professional affiliations are not universally available, the authors who did name their affiliation come from widely divergent disciplines including accounting, business administration, architecture, business computing, communication, computing, economics, educational technology, environmental management, experimental psychology, gender research in computer science, geography, human work sciences, humanistic informatics, industrial engineering, information management, informatics in transport and telecommunications, information science, information technology, management, mathematics, organizational behavior, pedagogy, psychology, telemedicine, and women's education. This is all to the good, but the lack of representation from departments of women's studies, gender studies, and library studies certainly limits the breadth and depth of the perspectives provided.
The volume is organized into 13 sections, each of which contains between two and eight conference papers. As with most conferences, the papers do not cover the issues in each section with equal weight or depth but the editors have grouped papers into reasonable patterns. Section 1 covers "understanding online behavior" with eight papers on problems such as e-learning attitudes, the neuropsychology of HCI, Japanese blogger motivation, and the dividing line between computer addiction and high engagement. Sections 2 (personality and computer attitudes), 3 (cyber interactions), and 4 (new interaction methods) each contain only two papers on topics such as helmet-mounted displays, online energy audits, and the use of ICT in family life. Sections 6, 7, and 8 focus on gender issues with papers on career development, the computer literacy of Malaysian women, mentoring, gaming, and faculty job satisfaction. Sections 9 and 10 move to a broader examination of cyber society and its diversity concerns with papers on cultural identity, virtual architecture, economic growth's impact on culture, and Iranian development impediments. Section 11's two articles on advertising might well have been merged with those of section 13's ebusiness. Section 12 addressed education with papers on topics such as computer-assisted homework, assessment, and Web-based learning. It would have been useful to introduce each section with a brief definition of the theme, summaries of the major contributions of the authors, and analyses of the gaps that might be addressed in future conferences. Despite the aforementioned concerns, this volume does provide a uniquely rich array of technological analyses embedded in social context. An examination of recent works in related areas finds nothing that is this complex culturally or that has such diversity of disciplines. Cultural Production in a Digital Age (Klinenberg, 2005), Perspectives and Policies on ICT in Society (Berleur & Avgerou, 2005), and Social, Ethical, and Policy Implications of Information Technology (Brennan & Johnson, 2004) address various aspects of the society/Internet intersection but this volume is unique in its coverage of psychology, gender, and culture issues in cyberspace. The lip service often given to global concerns and the value of interdisciplinary analysis of intransigent social problems seldom develop into a genuine willingness to listen to unfamiliar research paradigms. Academic silos and cultural islands need conferences like this one-willing to take on the risk of examining the large questions in an intellectually open space. Editorial and methodological concerns notwithstanding, this volume merits review and, where appropriate, careful consideration across disciplines."

LCSH

Information technology / Psychological aspects / Congresses
Information technology / Social aspects / Congresses
Information technology / Economic aspects / Congresses
Internet / Social aspects / Congresses

Subject

Information technology / Psychological aspects / Congresses
Information technology / Social aspects / Congresses
Information technology / Economic aspects / Congresses
Internet / Social aspects / Congresses

0.053466 = product of:
  0.106932 = sum of:
    0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06510731 = score(doc=142,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
    0.041824687 = product of:
      0.083649375 = sum of:
        0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083649375 = score(doc=142,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Information technology / Social aspects
Internet / Social aspects

Subject

Information technology / Social aspects
Internet / Social aspects

0.053340625 = product of:
  0.10668125 = sum of:
    0.09099023 = weight(_text_:social in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09099023 = score(doc=2753,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.49257156 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
    0.015691021 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031382043 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.

Date

22. 3.2009 18:50:30

0.053340625 = product of:
  0.10668125 = sum of:
    0.09099023 = weight(_text_:social in 2756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09099023 = score(doc=2756,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.49257156 = fieldWeight in 2756, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2756)
    0.015691021 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031382043 = score(doc=2756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2756)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This study examines the criteria questioners use to select the best answers in a social Q&A site (Yahoo! Answers) within the theoretical framework of relevance research. A social Q&A site is a novel environment where people voluntarily ask and answer questions. In Yahoo! Answers, the questioner selects the answer that best satisfies his or her question and leaves comments on it. Under the assumption that the comments reflect the reasons why questioners select particular answers as the best, this study analyzed 2,140 comments collected from Yahoo! Answers during December 2007. The content analysis identified 23 individual relevance criteria in six classes: Content, Cognitive, Utility, Information Sources, Extrinsic, and Socioemotional. A major finding is that the selection criteria used in a social Q&A site have considerable overlap with many relevance criteria uncovered in previous relevance studies, but that the scope of socio-emotional criteria has been expanded to include the social aspect of this environment. Another significant finding is that the relative importance of individual criteria varies according to topic categories. Socioemotional criteria are popular in discussion-oriented categories, content-oriented criteria in topic-oriented categories, and utility criteria in self-help categories. This study generalizes previous relevance studies to a new environment by going beyond an academic setting.

Date

22. 3.2009 18:57:23

0.046852265 = product of:
  0.09370453 = sum of:
    0.07279219 = weight(_text_:social in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07279219 = score(doc=3371,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.39405724 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
    0.020912344 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041824687 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19975184 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and relationships for digital repositories. Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of both today's possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often unstructured data.

Content

Inhalt: Introduction to Digital Libraries and Semantic Web: Introduction / Bill McDaniel and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Digital Libraries and Knowledge Organization / Dagobert Soergel - Semantic Web and Ontologies / Marcin Synak, Maciej Dabrowski and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Social Semantic Information Spaces / John G. Breslin A Vision of Semantic Digital Libraries: Goals of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel - Architecture of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Westerki and Ewelina Kruk - Long-time Preservation / Markus Reis Ontologies for Semantic Digital Libraries: Bibliographic Ontology / Maciej Dabrowski, Macin Synak and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Community-aware Ontologies / Slawomir Grzonkowski, Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Gzella, Jakub Demczuk and Bill McDaniel Prototypes of Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromeDL: The Social Semantic Digital Library / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Mariusz Cygan, Adam Gzella, Tomasz Woroniecki and Maciej Dabrowski - The BRICKS Digital Library Infrastructure / Bernhard Haslhofer and Predrag Knezevié - Semantics in Greenstone / Annika Hinze, George Buchanan, David Bainbridge and Ian Witten Building the Future - Semantic Digital Libraries in Use: Hyperbooks / Gilles Falquet, Luka Nerima and Jean-Claude Ziswiler - Semantic Digital Libraries for Archiving / Bill McDaniel - Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Ewelina Kruk and Katarzyna Stankiewicz - Conclusions: The Future of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel

0.041843854 = product of:
  0.08368771 = sum of:
    0.057547275 = weight(_text_:social in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057547275 = score(doc=195,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3115296 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
    0.026140431 = product of:
      0.052280862 = sum of:
        0.052280862 = weight(_text_:aspects in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052280862 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Web-related studies are a relatively new area of research. Tremendous growth continues in Web use, Web search engines, and Web sites. The interdisciplinary scope of Web research is broadening, and is now an important topic for publication in prestigious scientific journals such as Science and Nature. We are beginning to map the nature of users' Web interactions and the dimensions of better Web systems. However, researchers' and users struggle daily with the tough problems inherent in a system used for general interaction and e-commerce on a massive scale. This special issue of the Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology includes research articles that address key Web-related issues and problems. Individually and collectively, the articles provide a significant and substantial body of Web research. The diverse range of articles includes studies in Web searching, Web pages, and Web agents. Web searching research develops models of user behavior and conducts trends analysis of large-scale user data. Web page and system research centers on the development and testing of new algorithms, agents, Web page design, interfaces, and systems. Social and organizational impacts and aspects of the Web are not well represented in this special issue. A further special issue including social and organizational Web research is much needed

0.0414233 = product of:
  0.0828466 = sum of:
    0.05696889 = weight(_text_:social in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05696889 = score(doc=2862,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
    0.025877707 = product of:
      0.051755413 = sum of:
        0.051755413 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051755413 = score(doc=2862,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.2471803 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Inhalt: The new order of order -- Alphabetization and its discontents -- The geography of knowledge -- Lumps and splits -- The laws of the jungle -- Smart leaves -- Social knowing -- What nothing says -- Messiness as a virtue -- The work of knowledge.

Footnote

Rez. in: Publishers Weekly. May 2007: "In a high-minded twist on the Internet-has-changed-everything book, Weinberger (Small Pieces Loosely Joined) joins the ranks of social thinkers striving to construct new theories around the success of Google and Wikipedia. Organization or, rather, lack of it, is the key: the author insists that "we have to get rid of the idea that there's a best way of organizing the world." Building on his earlier works' discussions of the Internet-driven shift in power to users and consumers, Weinberger notes that "our homespun ways of maintaining order are going to break-they're already breaking-in the digital world." Today's avalanche of fresh information, Weinberger writes, requires relinquishing control of how we organize pretty much everything; he envisions an ever-changing array of "useful, powerful and beautiful ways to make sense of our world." Perhaps carried away by his thesis, the author gets into extended riffs on topics like the history of classification and the Dewey Decimal System. At the point where readers may want to turn his musings into strategies for living or doing business, he serves up intriguing but not exactly helpful epigrams about "the third order of order" and "useful miscellaneousness." But the book's call to embrace complexity will influence thinking about "the newly miscellanized world.""

LCSH

Information technology / Social aspects

Subject

Information technology / Social aspects

0.04028309 = product of:
  0.16113237 = sum of:
    0.16113237 = weight(_text_:social in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16113237 = score(doc=3905,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.87228286 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With increasing user presence in the Web and Web 2.0, Web social mining becomes an important and challenging task that finds a wide range of new applications relevant to e-commerce and social software. In this entry, we describe three Web social mining topics, namely, social network discovery, social network analysis, and social network applications. The essential concepts, models, and techniques of these Web social mining topics will be surveyed so as to establish the basic foundation for developing novel applications and for conducting research.

0.038955465 = product of:
  0.07791093 = sum of:
    0.06459665 = weight(_text_:social in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06459665 = score(doc=1308,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.34969112 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
    0.013314273 = product of:
      0.026628546 = sum of:
        0.026628546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026628546 = score(doc=1308,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

"Millionen von Internet-Nutzern drängen in soziale Netze wie StudiVZ und Facebook. Diese Online-Plattformen für die Vernetzung von persönlichen Web-Auftritten entwickeln sich zu einer neuen Art von Massenmedium, wie der Digitale-Medien-Experte Hendrik Speck sagt. Völlig offen sei aber bislang die Frage nach der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung der "Social Networks". "Die haben mehr Informationen, als die Stasi je hatte", sagt der Informatik-Professor der Fachhochschule Kaiserslautern im Gespräch mit der Nachrichtenagentur AP. Bei den drei Plattformen Facebook, MySpace und Xing hat Speck insgesamt 120 persönliche Attribute gezählt, die auf den persönlichen Seiten der Mitglieder angegeben werden können - angefangen bei Alter und Wohnort über Lieblingsfilme und -musik bis hin zu politischer Neigung und sexueller Ausrichtung. "Wir sehen da einen völlig irrationalen Zugang zu den eigenen Daten", kritisiert der Social-Networks-Forscher. Was aber treibt die Internet-Nutzer zu dieser Art von "digitalem Exhibitionismus"? Speck und seine Studenten haben die Kommunikation in den Netzen mit Hilfe von Software-Agenten und "Crawlern" zu erfassen versucht - das sind Programme, die auf die Seiten dieser Communities vordringen und die Inhalte auswerten. "Wir stellen fest, dass da unheimlich viel offen liegt", sagt Speck. Suche nach Anerkennung und Aufmerksamkeit Als wichtige Antriebskraft hat der Wissenschaftler das Motiv ausgemacht, über den stetig wachsenden Kreis von registrierten "Freunden" Anerkennung und Aufmerksamkeit zu erringen. Bei MySpace oder im SchülerVZ kann sich jeder auf eine Weise präsentieren, wie es in den klassischen Medien kaum möglich ist. Und weil die persönlichen Profile mit wenigen Mausklicks schnell erstellt sind, ist die Eintrittsschwelle sehr viel geringer als bei den Netz-Communities der ersten Stunde, etwa der schon 1985 gegründeten virtuellen Gemeinschaft "The WELL".
Bislang sind es meist Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene bis etwa 35, die die Mehrheit der Community-Mitglieder ausmachen. Es gebe aber Bestrebungen, die Altersgruppe nach oben zu erweitern, sagt Speck. Die soziale Interaktion in den Social Networks kreist nach seinen Erkenntnissen immer wieder um die gleichen Dinge: 1) Unterhaltung - von Musik bis zu Stars und Sternchen 2) die gesellschaftlich geteilte Schadenfreude nach dem Motto "Pleiten, Pech und Pannen" 3) Flirten und sexuelle Beziehungen. Dabei kommen Männer direkter auf den Punkt als Frauen, die dies hinter anderen Interessen verstecken. Auf der anderen Seite stehen die Betreiber der Netze. Diese erzielen mit der Bereitstellung der Plattform zwar bislang meist noch keine Gewinne, haben aber wegen der gigantischen Zuwachsraten das Interesse von Internet- und Medienunternehmen geweckt, die wie Microsoft oder die Verlagsgruppe Holtzbrinck in Social Networks investieren. Der einzelne Nutzer ist 20 bis 22 Dollar wert Da die Technik der Webseiten nicht besonders aufwendig sei, liege der eigentliche Reichtum in den Nutzern und ihren Daten, erklärt Speck. Bei den großen Plattformen in den USA lasse sich aus den getätigten Investitionen für die Social Networks der Wert eines einzelnen Nutzers auf einen Betrag von 20 bis 22 Dollar (14 bis 15 Euro) schätzen. Der Gegenwert, den die Nutzer liefern sollen, wird vor allem in der Werbung gesehen. Neben der klassischen Bannerwerbung auf den eigenen Seiten versuchen die Betreiber der sozialen Netzwerke nach Darstellung Specks, in andere Dienste wie SMS-Werbung oder E-Mail vorzudringen. Um die Werbe-Zielgruppen immer feiner zu erfassen, werde auch untersucht, wer mit welchem Profil mit wem kommuniziere. "Je tiefer die Vernetzung, desto dichter werden die Informationen", erklärt Speck.
Der Wissenschaftler kritisiert, dass die Daten so behandelt würden, als gehörten sie nicht dem Nutzer, sondern den sozialen Netzwerken. Selbst wenn es die Möglichkeit gebe, einen Account zu löschen, blieben die Daten vielfach weiter bestehen. Und über die beliebten Mini-Anwendungen zur Integration in die eigene Profilseite erhielten auch die Entwickler dieser Applikationen einen Zugang zu den persönlichen Daten. "Da weiß man dann gar nicht, wer dahinter steckt." Weder "open" noch "social" Google hat Anfang November vergangenen Jahres unter der Bezeichung OpenSocial eine Initiative gestartet, um solche Anwendungen und Schnittstellen nach einheitlichen Standards programmieren zu können. Das Projekt sei aber weder "open" noch "social", weil nicht vorgesehen sei, den Nutzern eine transparente Kontrolle über ihre eigenen Daten zu geben, bemängelt der FH-Professor. Das Projekt bemühe sich um die "Datenportabilität" zwischen den kommerziellen Projektpartnern und unterstütze die Interaktionen zwischen einzelnen Communities, versage jedoch komplett bei der Interessenswahrnehmung der Nutzer in Hinblick auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung und einem verbesserten Schutz der Privatssphäre. Um die zahlreichen offenen Fragen nach der Verantwortung für die Millionen von persönlichen Daten zu klären, schlägt Speck einen Verhaltenskodex für soziale Netzwerke vor. Für die gemeinsame Entwicklung von ethischen Grundsätzen will er neben Datenschützern auch die Betreiber der Communities gewinnen und hofft, schon in wenigen Monaten eine entsprechende Initiative vorstellen zu können. http://www.hendrikspeck.com"

0.037806172 = product of:
  0.075612344 = sum of:
    0.04603782 = weight(_text_:social in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04603782 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.24922368 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.029574523 = product of:
      0.059149045 = sum of:
        0.059149045 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059149045 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.28249177 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Information technology / Social aspects

Subject

Information technology / Social aspects

0.037294894 = product of:
  0.14917958 = sum of:
    0.14917958 = weight(_text_:social in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14917958 = score(doc=2831,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.807577 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Blogging and other types of social media such as wikis and social networking sites have transformed the way we use the internet in recent years. It is a transformation that business is eager to exploit. In order to do so, a clear commercial strategy needs to be established; does your organization wish to use the media actively as a business tool, or do you need to respond to the use of social media by others? "Blogging and Other Social Media" will address this question with practical guidance on using social media as well as the risks associated with it. A collaboration by leading thinkers and business users of social media, the book contains detailed and practical advice on the various forms of social media - their applications, advantages and disadvantages, how these technologies are evolving, and whether or not their use will benefit your business. The section covering social media and the law explains the risks and remedies related to abuse of copyright, defamation, privacy, data protection and user contracts as well as the opportunities and threats for online reputation.If you are looking to encourage your employees but want to protect your business from the threats this emerging media presents, get a copy of this practical guide and study it before you start including social media as part of your corporate marketing or communications strategy.

Content

Introduction to blogs - Creating a blog - Writing a blog - Enhancing the experience - Is blogging worthwhile for a business? - Introduction to social media - Professional networks for businesses - Industry specific professional networks - Wikis - Online office applications - Podcasting - Social bookmarking and online content democracy - Forerunners to social media - Social media aggregators - Social tools inside the enterprise - Elements of enterprise - Examples and conclusion - The law of social media - Online reputation

Footnote

Rez. in: IWP 60(2009) H.3, S.177 (M. Buzinkay): "Social Software, Social Media oder Web 2.0 - Begriffe, die seit mehreren Jahren die Web-Welt beschäftigten und dominieren, stehen im Mittelpunkt dieses 2008 erschienen Bandes von Alex Newson, Derryck Houghton und Justin Patten. Der Schwerpunkt dieses Werkes steht im Untertitel verborgen: "Exploiting the Technology and Protecting the Enterprise". . . . Zusammengefasst lässt sich sagen, dass das Buch sicherlich für totale Anfänger in Sachen Social Media durchaus eine erste Zusammenschau der Materie ermöglichen kann, wenn auch mit großen Lücken. Für Organisationen, die sich also dieser Werkzeuge bedienen wollen, und zu diesem Zweck ein Praxis-nahes Buch zwecks Implementierung suchen, kann ich es aber nicht empfehlen. Es bietet einfach zu wenig, und auch das Rechtskapitel ist nur für unter britischem Recht operierenden Firmen interessant."

LCSH

Social media

Subject

Social media

0.037068475 = product of:
  0.07413695 = sum of:
    0.056384586 = weight(_text_:social in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056384586 = score(doc=3012,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.30523545 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
    0.017752362 = product of:
      0.035504725 = sum of:
        0.035504725 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035504725 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

When we were all facing the turn of the century and the somewhat larger turn of the millennium, we left behind epochs of colonialism, imperialism, capitalism, nazism and racialism. Not that the ideologies mentioned does no longer exist, but their impact as grand narratives has gone and they now exist as fragmented discursive parts of their former, illusive hegemony. Parts that have been thrown into the pits of post modern complexity. The 21st century holds no answers, no new meaning, at most it provides human communication a certain self reflectivity due to the increasing egocentrism and individuality of people (i.e. still mostly western people). Another symptom of the loss of grand narratives is a feeling of loss of meaning in everyday life, as well as the state of democracies around the world. Democracy shivers in its void between anarchy and repressive dictatorship. The description 'information age' provides the times we are in with a useful sticker. It tents both back in time e.g. the late 20, century digitalisation and forward in time by givingr origin to the contemporary discourse of social semantics i.e. Dream society, Knowledge society, Post modern society, Risk society, Hypercomplex society etc. The phrase 'information age' implied the introduction of a paradigm shift, and now it is still here showing that paradigms do not shift, they slide. This paper outlines a manifest for librarians and librarianship of the information age. The information age puts the spotlight on the librarian, both regarding classical tasks such as classification and cataloguing as well as new tasks such as systems analysis and design or database searching.
Complexity establishes a paradox between the tasks of preserving old knowledge (memory function) and facilitate cognitive dissonance in order to challenge established knowledge claims and create new knowledge (catalyser function). Through complexity all social systems organisations, discourse communities, ideologies) face an environment (or surrounding) that is characterised through its instability and contingency. What is real, or presumable real from one point of view can appear completely different from another point of view. Different discourses of meaning and significance float, blend and separates themselves form each other the arena of communication. The library has to both keep record of what has happened, as well as take part in the ongoing battles for new discursive hegemonies. The unity of the paradox of memory and catalysing is described as managing complexity and requires a conscious and constant oscillation between order and chaos, stability and change. The role of the librarian is defined through an analysis of contemporary social semantics as well as the technical, ethical, cultural and epistemological challenges facing us as librarians and information specialists.

Date

22. 7.2009 11:23:22

0.03686142 = product of:
  0.14744568 = sum of:
    0.14744568 = sum of:
      0.10351083 = weight(_text_:aspects in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10351083 = score(doc=4754,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.4943606 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
      0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043934856 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.

Date

10.12.2005 11:22:13

0.03661915 = product of:
  0.0732383 = sum of:
    0.057547275 = weight(_text_:social in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057547275 = score(doc=2569,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3115296 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
    0.015691021 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031382043 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The "photosharing" site Flickr is one of the most commonly cited examples used to define Web2.0. This paper aims to explore where Flickr's real novelty lies, examining its functionality and its place in the world of amateur photography. Several optimistic views of the impact of Flickr such as its facilitation of citizen journalism, "vernacular creativity" and in learning as an "affinity space" are evaluated. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on a wide range of sources including published interviews with its developers, user opinions expressed in forums, telephone interviews and content analysis of user profiles and activity. Findings - Flickr's development path passes from an innovative social game to a relatively familiar model of a web site, itself developed through intense user participation but later stabilising with the reassertion of a commercial relationship to the membership. The broader context of the impact of Flickr is examined by looking at the institutions of amateur photography and particularly the code of pictorialism promoted by the clubs and industry during the twentieth century. The nature of Flickr as a benign space is premised on the way the democratic potential of photography is controlled by such institutions. The limits of optimistic claims about Flickr are identified in the way that the system is designed to satisfy commercial purposes, continuing digital divides in access and the low interactivity and criticality on Flickr. Originality/value - Flickr is an interesting source of change, but can only be understood in the perspective of long-term development of the hobby and wider social processes. By setting Flickr in such a broad context, its significance and that of Web2.0 more generally can be fully assessed.

Date

30.12.2008 19:38:22

0.036396094 = product of:
  0.14558437 = sum of:
    0.14558437 = weight(_text_:social in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14558437 = score(doc=3587,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.7881145 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A fascinating, research-based look at the impact of social media on businesses and consumers around the world, and what's in store for the future Social Media. You've heard the term, even if you don't use the tools. But just how big has social media become? Social media has officially surpassed pornography as the top activity on the Internet. People would rather give up their e-mail than their social network. It is so powerful that it is causing a macro shift in the way we live and conduct business. Brands can now be strengthened or destroyed by the use of social media. Online networking sites are being used as giant, free focus groups. Advertising is less effective at influencing consumers than the opinions of their peers. If you aren't using social media in your business strategy, you are already behind your competition. * Explores how the concept of "Socialnomics" is changing the way businesses produce, market, and sell, eliminating inefficient marketing and middlemen, and making products easier and cheaper for consumers to obtain * Learn how successful businesses are connecting with consumers like never before via Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and other social media sites * A must-read for anyone wanting to learn about, and harness the power of social media, rather than be squashed by it * Author Erik Qualman is a former online marketer for several Top 100 brands and the current Global Vice President of Online Marketing for the world's largest private education firm Socialnomics is essential book for anyone who wants to understand the implications of social media, and how businesses can tap the power of social media to increase their sales, cut their marketing costs, and reach consumers directly.

Content

Introduction: It's a people-driven economy, stupid -- Word of mouth goes world of mouth -- Social media = preventative behavior -- Social media = braggadocian behavior -- Obama's success driven by social media -- I care more about what my neighbor thinks than what Google thinks -- Death of social schizophrenia -- Winners and losers in a 140-character world -- Next step for companies and the "glass house generation" -- Socialnomics summary.

LCSH

Social media
Social networks

Subject

Social media
Social networks

0.033829853 = product of:
  0.067659706 = sum of:
    0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04883048 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
    0.018829225 = product of:
      0.03765845 = sum of:
        0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03765845 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The importance of trust in building and maintaining consumer relationships in the online environment is widely accepted in the Information Systems literature. A key challenge for researchers is to identify antecedent variables that engender consumer trust in Internet shopping. This paper adopts a multidisciplinary approach and develops an integrative model of consumer trust in Internet shopping through synthesizing the three diverse trust literatures. The social psychological perspective guides us to include perceived trustworthiness of Internet merchants as the key determinant of consumer trust in Internet shopping. The sociological viewpoint suggests the inclusion of legal framework and third-party recognition in the research model. The views of personality theorists postulate a direct effect of propensity to trust on consumer trust in Internet shopping. The results of this study provide strong support for the research model and research hypotheses, and the high explanatory power illustrates the complementarity of the three streams of research on trust. This paper contributes to the conceptual and empirical understanding of consumer trust in Internet shopping. Implications of this study are noteworthy for both researchers and practitioners.

Date

22. 7.2006 17:06:10